模糊社会网络中的位置分析

T. Fan, C. Liau, T. Lin
{"title":"模糊社会网络中的位置分析","authors":"T. Fan, C. Liau, T. Lin","doi":"10.1109/GrC.2007.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social network analysis is a methodology used extensively in social and behavioral sciences, as well as in political science, economics, organization theory, and industrial engineering. Positional analysis of a social network aims to find similarities between actors in the network. One of the the most studied notions in the positional analysis of social networks is regular equivalence. According to Borgatti and Everett, two actors are regularly equivalent if they are equally related to equivalent others. In recent years, fuzzy social networks have also received considerable attention because they can represent both the qualitative relationship and the degrees of interaction between actors. In this paper, we generalize the notion of regular equivalence to fuzzy social networks based on two alternative definitions of regular equivalence. While these two definitions are equivalent for social networks, they induce different generalizations for fuzzy social networks. The first generalization, called regular similarity, is based on the characterization of regular equivalence as an equivalence relation that commutes with the underlying social relations. The regular similarity is then a fuzzy binary relation that specifies the degree of similarity between actors in the social network. The second generalization, called generalized regular equivalence, is based on the definition of role assignment or coloring. A role assignment (resp. coloring) is a mapping from the set of actors to a set of roles (resp. colors). The mapping is regular if actors assigned to the same role have the same roles in their neighborhoods. Consequently, generalized regular equivalence is an equivalence relation that can determine the role partition of the actors in a fuzzy social network.","PeriodicalId":259430,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)","volume":"95 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"50","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Positional Analysis in Fuzzy Social Networks\",\"authors\":\"T. Fan, C. Liau, T. Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/GrC.2007.9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social network analysis is a methodology used extensively in social and behavioral sciences, as well as in political science, economics, organization theory, and industrial engineering. Positional analysis of a social network aims to find similarities between actors in the network. One of the the most studied notions in the positional analysis of social networks is regular equivalence. According to Borgatti and Everett, two actors are regularly equivalent if they are equally related to equivalent others. In recent years, fuzzy social networks have also received considerable attention because they can represent both the qualitative relationship and the degrees of interaction between actors. In this paper, we generalize the notion of regular equivalence to fuzzy social networks based on two alternative definitions of regular equivalence. While these two definitions are equivalent for social networks, they induce different generalizations for fuzzy social networks. The first generalization, called regular similarity, is based on the characterization of regular equivalence as an equivalence relation that commutes with the underlying social relations. The regular similarity is then a fuzzy binary relation that specifies the degree of similarity between actors in the social network. The second generalization, called generalized regular equivalence, is based on the definition of role assignment or coloring. A role assignment (resp. coloring) is a mapping from the set of actors to a set of roles (resp. colors). The mapping is regular if actors assigned to the same role have the same roles in their neighborhoods. Consequently, generalized regular equivalence is an equivalence relation that can determine the role partition of the actors in a fuzzy social network.\",\"PeriodicalId\":259430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)\",\"volume\":\"95 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"50\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/GrC.2007.9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE International Conference on Granular Computing (GRC 2007)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GrC.2007.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 50

摘要

社会网络分析是一种广泛应用于社会科学和行为科学,以及政治学、经济学、组织理论和工业工程的方法。社会网络的位置分析旨在发现网络中参与者之间的相似之处。规则等价是社会网络位置分析中研究最多的概念之一。根据Borgatti和Everett的观点,如果两个行动者与其他同等的行动者有同等的关系,那么他们就是规则等价的。近年来,模糊社交网络也受到了相当多的关注,因为它既可以表征行为者之间的质的关系,也可以表征行为者之间的互动程度。本文基于正则等价的两种定义,将正则等价的概念推广到模糊社会网络。虽然这两种定义对于社会网络是等价的,但对于模糊社会网络却有不同的概括。第一个泛化称为规则相似性,是基于将规则等价描述为与底层社会关系交换的等价关系。规则相似度是一个模糊的二元关系,它指定了社会网络中参与者之间的相似程度。第二种推广称为广义正则等价,是基于角色分配或着色的定义。角色分配(响应)。着色)是从一组参与者到一组角色的映射。颜色)。如果分配给相同角色的参与者在其邻居中具有相同的角色,则映射是规则的。因此,广义正则等价是一种确定模糊社会网络中行动者角色划分的等价关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Positional Analysis in Fuzzy Social Networks
Social network analysis is a methodology used extensively in social and behavioral sciences, as well as in political science, economics, organization theory, and industrial engineering. Positional analysis of a social network aims to find similarities between actors in the network. One of the the most studied notions in the positional analysis of social networks is regular equivalence. According to Borgatti and Everett, two actors are regularly equivalent if they are equally related to equivalent others. In recent years, fuzzy social networks have also received considerable attention because they can represent both the qualitative relationship and the degrees of interaction between actors. In this paper, we generalize the notion of regular equivalence to fuzzy social networks based on two alternative definitions of regular equivalence. While these two definitions are equivalent for social networks, they induce different generalizations for fuzzy social networks. The first generalization, called regular similarity, is based on the characterization of regular equivalence as an equivalence relation that commutes with the underlying social relations. The regular similarity is then a fuzzy binary relation that specifies the degree of similarity between actors in the social network. The second generalization, called generalized regular equivalence, is based on the definition of role assignment or coloring. A role assignment (resp. coloring) is a mapping from the set of actors to a set of roles (resp. colors). The mapping is regular if actors assigned to the same role have the same roles in their neighborhoods. Consequently, generalized regular equivalence is an equivalence relation that can determine the role partition of the actors in a fuzzy social network.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信