《古兰经》中的其他宗教人士ān和皈依

Reiko Okawa
{"title":"《古兰经》中的其他宗教人士ān和皈依","authors":"Reiko Okawa","doi":"10.55831/ajis.v6i3.365","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines how two contemporary Muslim thinkers, Farid Esack (1955–) and Reza Shah-Kazemi (1960–), developed their thoughts on non-Muslims through the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Traditionally non-Muslims have been called Ahl al-Kitāb, i.e., People of the Book, or kuffār (sg. kāfir), i.e., infidels, and believed to be inferior to Muslims. In this globalizing world, however, it can be thought that it is an urgent issue to pursue peaceful co-existence among different religions. Esack, a South African scholar and activist, emphasized religious pluralism, while Shah-Kazemi, a London-based scholar with an esoteric tendency, emphasized universalism and inter-faith dialogue. Both of them, however, have tried to understand Non-Muslims by regarding them as “religious Others”, not to think that da‘wah, calling for conversion, is an imperative, and to aim to establish the ultimate religion of one God for all humankind. It could be said that their thoughts on peaceful co-existence between Muslims and non-Muslims is an effort to surpass the traditional exclusiveness to provide a space for monotheistic believers who put a premium on tolerance of religious Others. But both elaborate their ideas without discussing polytheists, which will be required as the next step in establishing the ultimate religion.","PeriodicalId":178428,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"163 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Religious Others in the Qur’ān and Conversion\",\"authors\":\"Reiko Okawa\",\"doi\":\"10.55831/ajis.v6i3.365\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study examines how two contemporary Muslim thinkers, Farid Esack (1955–) and Reza Shah-Kazemi (1960–), developed their thoughts on non-Muslims through the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Traditionally non-Muslims have been called Ahl al-Kitāb, i.e., People of the Book, or kuffār (sg. kāfir), i.e., infidels, and believed to be inferior to Muslims. In this globalizing world, however, it can be thought that it is an urgent issue to pursue peaceful co-existence among different religions. Esack, a South African scholar and activist, emphasized religious pluralism, while Shah-Kazemi, a London-based scholar with an esoteric tendency, emphasized universalism and inter-faith dialogue. Both of them, however, have tried to understand Non-Muslims by regarding them as “religious Others”, not to think that da‘wah, calling for conversion, is an imperative, and to aim to establish the ultimate religion of one God for all humankind. It could be said that their thoughts on peaceful co-existence between Muslims and non-Muslims is an effort to surpass the traditional exclusiveness to provide a space for monotheistic believers who put a premium on tolerance of religious Others. But both elaborate their ideas without discussing polytheists, which will be required as the next step in establishing the ultimate religion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies\",\"volume\":\"163 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v6i3.365\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v6i3.365","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了两位当代穆斯林思想家法里德·埃萨克(1955 -)和礼萨·沙-卡齐米(1960 -)如何通过对古兰经ān的解释来发展他们对非穆斯林的看法。传统上,非穆斯林被称为Ahl al-Kitāb,即有经之人,或kuffār。kāfir),即异教徒,被认为不如穆斯林。然而,在这个全球化的世界中,追求不同宗教之间的和平共处是一个紧迫的问题。然而,他们都试图通过将非穆斯林视为“宗教他人”来理解他们,而不是认为要求皈依的“达瓦”是必要的,他们的目标是为全人类建立一个上帝的终极宗教。可以说,他们关于穆斯林与非穆斯林和平共处的思想,是为了超越传统的排他性,为一神教信徒提供一个空间,而一神教信徒更重视对宗教他者的宽容。但两人都详细阐述了自己的观点,但都没有讨论多神教,而多神教是建立终极宗教的下一步所必需的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Religious Others in the Qur’ān and Conversion
This study examines how two contemporary Muslim thinkers, Farid Esack (1955–) and Reza Shah-Kazemi (1960–), developed their thoughts on non-Muslims through the interpretation of the Qur’ān. Traditionally non-Muslims have been called Ahl al-Kitāb, i.e., People of the Book, or kuffār (sg. kāfir), i.e., infidels, and believed to be inferior to Muslims. In this globalizing world, however, it can be thought that it is an urgent issue to pursue peaceful co-existence among different religions. Esack, a South African scholar and activist, emphasized religious pluralism, while Shah-Kazemi, a London-based scholar with an esoteric tendency, emphasized universalism and inter-faith dialogue. Both of them, however, have tried to understand Non-Muslims by regarding them as “religious Others”, not to think that da‘wah, calling for conversion, is an imperative, and to aim to establish the ultimate religion of one God for all humankind. It could be said that their thoughts on peaceful co-existence between Muslims and non-Muslims is an effort to surpass the traditional exclusiveness to provide a space for monotheistic believers who put a premium on tolerance of religious Others. But both elaborate their ideas without discussing polytheists, which will be required as the next step in establishing the ultimate religion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信