关于制裁与中国

A. Poh
{"title":"关于制裁与中国","authors":"A. Poh","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Chapter 2 clarifies the definition of sanctions and draws on the existing\n international relations literature to discuss four different expectations that\n speak to the central puzzle of this book. These expectations are based on\n structural, domestic, and cultural factors: China was simply ‘not yet powerful\n enough’ to employ sanctions in a wholehearted manner; the Chinese political\n leadership may have at times been constrained by its domestic actors; China’s\n participation in international institutions shaped its sanctions behaviour;\n and the Chinese political elite may have inherited certain predispositions\n that led them to favour the use of ‘carrots’, like economic inducements, over\n ‘sticks’, such as punitive sanctions. It finds that none of these explanations\n provide a wholly satisfactory answer to the puzzle.","PeriodicalId":239203,"journal":{"name":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On Sanctions and China\",\"authors\":\"A. Poh\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Chapter 2 clarifies the definition of sanctions and draws on the existing\\n international relations literature to discuss four different expectations that\\n speak to the central puzzle of this book. These expectations are based on\\n structural, domestic, and cultural factors: China was simply ‘not yet powerful\\n enough’ to employ sanctions in a wholehearted manner; the Chinese political\\n leadership may have at times been constrained by its domestic actors; China’s\\n participation in international institutions shaped its sanctions behaviour;\\n and the Chinese political elite may have inherited certain predispositions\\n that led them to favour the use of ‘carrots’, like economic inducements, over\\n ‘sticks’, such as punitive sanctions. It finds that none of these explanations\\n provide a wholly satisfactory answer to the puzzle.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sanctions with Chinese Characteristics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv1bhg2w8.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

第二章澄清了制裁的定义,并利用现有的国际关系文献讨论了四种不同的期望,这些期望与本书的中心谜题有关。这些期望是基于结构性、国内和文化因素:中国“还不够强大”,无法全心全意地实施制裁;中国的政治领导层有时可能会受到国内行动者的制约;中国对国际机构的参与影响了其制裁行为;中国的政治精英可能继承了某些倾向,导致他们倾向于使用“胡萝卜”,如经济诱惑,而不是“大棒”,如惩罚性制裁。它发现,这些解释都没有提供一个完全令人满意的答案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On Sanctions and China
Chapter 2 clarifies the definition of sanctions and draws on the existing international relations literature to discuss four different expectations that speak to the central puzzle of this book. These expectations are based on structural, domestic, and cultural factors: China was simply ‘not yet powerful enough’ to employ sanctions in a wholehearted manner; the Chinese political leadership may have at times been constrained by its domestic actors; China’s participation in international institutions shaped its sanctions behaviour; and the Chinese political elite may have inherited certain predispositions that led them to favour the use of ‘carrots’, like economic inducements, over ‘sticks’, such as punitive sanctions. It finds that none of these explanations provide a wholly satisfactory answer to the puzzle.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信