{"title":"高校教师职业压力弹性与工作绩效","authors":"Maria Hameed, Rabia Hameed, Ghazanafar Hussain","doi":"10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-ii).11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study attempts to test the relationship between professional stress tolerance and the productivity of university professors. The evaluation criteria used in this study are 1. Work Stress Questionnaire (JSQ) ofTöres, (1988), 2. Work Resilience Questionnaire (WRQ) of Winwood et al., (2013) and, 3. Work Performance Questionnaire (WPQ) of Koopmans, (2014). The regression analysis has been applied to predict the relationship among the research variables of this study. In addition, the t-test is also used to analyze the gender-based differences and differences in work stress and work resilience of university academicians. The results depicted at female university teachers faced more work stress compared to male university teachers, and male university teachers had a higher mean score regarding work resilience than female university teachers. Furthermore,obtained the results of the research explained that level of flexibility and supposed work efficiency are positively correlated. The significant prognosticator of work performance was occupational stress resilience. However,work performance was not predicted by work stress.","PeriodicalId":305544,"journal":{"name":"Global Sociological Review","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupational Stress Resilience among University Teachers and their Work Performance\",\"authors\":\"Maria Hameed, Rabia Hameed, Ghazanafar Hussain\",\"doi\":\"10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-ii).11\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study attempts to test the relationship between professional stress tolerance and the productivity of university professors. The evaluation criteria used in this study are 1. Work Stress Questionnaire (JSQ) ofTöres, (1988), 2. Work Resilience Questionnaire (WRQ) of Winwood et al., (2013) and, 3. Work Performance Questionnaire (WPQ) of Koopmans, (2014). The regression analysis has been applied to predict the relationship among the research variables of this study. In addition, the t-test is also used to analyze the gender-based differences and differences in work stress and work resilience of university academicians. The results depicted at female university teachers faced more work stress compared to male university teachers, and male university teachers had a higher mean score regarding work resilience than female university teachers. Furthermore,obtained the results of the research explained that level of flexibility and supposed work efficiency are positively correlated. The significant prognosticator of work performance was occupational stress resilience. However,work performance was not predicted by work stress.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305544,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Sociological Review\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Sociological Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-ii).11\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sociological Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/gsr.2022(vii-ii).11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究试图检验大学教授职业压力承受能力与工作效率之间的关系。本研究采用的评价标准为1。工作压力问卷(JSQ) ofTöres,(1988), 2。Winwood et al., (2013) and, 3.工作弹性问卷(WRQ)。工作绩效问卷(WPQ), Koopmans,(2014)。运用回归分析预测本研究各研究变量之间的关系。此外,还采用t检验分析了大学院士在工作压力和工作弹性方面的性别差异和差异。结果表明,大学女教师面临的工作压力高于大学男教师,大学男教师的工作弹性平均得分高于大学女教师。此外,得到的研究结果解释了灵活性水平与假设工作效率呈正相关。职业压力弹性是工作绩效的显著预测因子。然而,工作压力并不能预测工作绩效。
Occupational Stress Resilience among University Teachers and their Work Performance
This study attempts to test the relationship between professional stress tolerance and the productivity of university professors. The evaluation criteria used in this study are 1. Work Stress Questionnaire (JSQ) ofTöres, (1988), 2. Work Resilience Questionnaire (WRQ) of Winwood et al., (2013) and, 3. Work Performance Questionnaire (WPQ) of Koopmans, (2014). The regression analysis has been applied to predict the relationship among the research variables of this study. In addition, the t-test is also used to analyze the gender-based differences and differences in work stress and work resilience of university academicians. The results depicted at female university teachers faced more work stress compared to male university teachers, and male university teachers had a higher mean score regarding work resilience than female university teachers. Furthermore,obtained the results of the research explained that level of flexibility and supposed work efficiency are positively correlated. The significant prognosticator of work performance was occupational stress resilience. However,work performance was not predicted by work stress.