{"title":"双长球形船体在不同纵向和横向构型下阻力的数值研究","authors":"P. Rattanasiri, P. Wilson, A. Phillips","doi":"10.1109/AUV.2012.6380731","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance for operators on suitable spacings for multiple vehicle missions. This paper then investigates the combined drag of a pair of towed prolate spheroids for the length-Reynolds Number of 3.2×106. The model has a length-diameter ratio of 6:1. A series of configuration of a pair of spheroids is simulated by varying both longitudinal and transverse spacing. Three-dimensional simulations are performed using a commercial Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) Computational Fluid Dynamics code ANSYS CFX 12.1 with the SST turbulence closure model. In each case, the fluid domain has a mesh size of approximately nine million cells including inflated prism layers to capture the boundary layer. Mesh convergence is tested and then validated with wind tunnel test results. The drag of each spheroid is compared against the benchmark drag of a single hull. The results show that the transverse separations and longitudinal offsets determine the interaction drag between both hulls. Increasing of spacing results in lower the interference drag. Five zones have been suggested based on the characteristics of the combined drag and individual drags. These are Parallel Region, Echelon Region, Low Interaction Region, Push Region and Drafting Region. Based on the results, operators can determine the optimal configurations based on energy considerations.","PeriodicalId":340133,"journal":{"name":"2012 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV)","volume":"181 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical investigation of the drag of twin prolate spheroid hulls in various longitudinal and transverse configurations\",\"authors\":\"P. Rattanasiri, P. Wilson, A. Phillips\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/AUV.2012.6380731\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance for operators on suitable spacings for multiple vehicle missions. This paper then investigates the combined drag of a pair of towed prolate spheroids for the length-Reynolds Number of 3.2×106. The model has a length-diameter ratio of 6:1. A series of configuration of a pair of spheroids is simulated by varying both longitudinal and transverse spacing. Three-dimensional simulations are performed using a commercial Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) Computational Fluid Dynamics code ANSYS CFX 12.1 with the SST turbulence closure model. In each case, the fluid domain has a mesh size of approximately nine million cells including inflated prism layers to capture the boundary layer. Mesh convergence is tested and then validated with wind tunnel test results. The drag of each spheroid is compared against the benchmark drag of a single hull. The results show that the transverse separations and longitudinal offsets determine the interaction drag between both hulls. Increasing of spacing results in lower the interference drag. Five zones have been suggested based on the characteristics of the combined drag and individual drags. These are Parallel Region, Echelon Region, Low Interaction Region, Push Region and Drafting Region. Based on the results, operators can determine the optimal configurations based on energy considerations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV)\",\"volume\":\"181 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUV.2012.6380731\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (AUV)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUV.2012.6380731","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
本文的目的是为操作人员在多飞行器任务中选择合适的间距提供指导。然后,本文研究了一对拖曳的长球面的组合阻力对3.2×106的长度-雷诺数。模型的长径比为6:1。通过改变一对球面的纵向和横向间距,模拟了一系列球面的形态。三维模拟使用商用Reynolds average Navier Stokes (RANS)计算流体动力学代码ANSYS CFX 12.1与SST湍流闭合模型进行。在每种情况下,流体域的网格尺寸约为900万个单元,包括用于捕获边界层的膨胀棱柱层。对网格收敛性进行了测试,并用风洞试验结果进行了验证。将每个球体的阻力与单个船体的基准阻力进行比较。结果表明,横向分离和纵向偏移决定了两船体之间的相互作用阻力。增大间距可以减小干涉阻力。根据组合阻力和单个阻力的特点,提出了五个区域。它们是平行区、梯队区、低相互作用区、推动区和起草区。根据结果,运营商可以根据能源考虑来确定最佳配置。
Numerical investigation of the drag of twin prolate spheroid hulls in various longitudinal and transverse configurations
The purpose of this paper is to provide guidance for operators on suitable spacings for multiple vehicle missions. This paper then investigates the combined drag of a pair of towed prolate spheroids for the length-Reynolds Number of 3.2×106. The model has a length-diameter ratio of 6:1. A series of configuration of a pair of spheroids is simulated by varying both longitudinal and transverse spacing. Three-dimensional simulations are performed using a commercial Reynolds Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) Computational Fluid Dynamics code ANSYS CFX 12.1 with the SST turbulence closure model. In each case, the fluid domain has a mesh size of approximately nine million cells including inflated prism layers to capture the boundary layer. Mesh convergence is tested and then validated with wind tunnel test results. The drag of each spheroid is compared against the benchmark drag of a single hull. The results show that the transverse separations and longitudinal offsets determine the interaction drag between both hulls. Increasing of spacing results in lower the interference drag. Five zones have been suggested based on the characteristics of the combined drag and individual drags. These are Parallel Region, Echelon Region, Low Interaction Region, Push Region and Drafting Region. Based on the results, operators can determine the optimal configurations based on energy considerations.