天线分集方案的比较

Proceedings RAWCON 98. 1998 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.98EX194) Pub Date : 1998-08-09 DOI:10.1109/RAWCON.1998.709161

B. Gavilanes-Loureiro, I. De Coster, E. V. Van Lil, F. Pérez-Fontán

{"title":"天线分集方案的比较","authors":"B. Gavilanes-Loureiro, I. De Coster, E. V. Van Lil, F. Pérez-Fontán","doi":"10.1109/RAWCON.1998.709161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares 4 kinds of simple diversity schemes for an indoor scenario at 2.4 GHz: polarisation, dual antenna, antenna and polarisation, and triple antenna for an indoor scenario, all combined according to 5 different techniques. Useful parameters are extracted statistically. We conclude that the power combining method gives the best results, and that the extra complexity of the 3 antenna case is not always justified from a cost viewpoint.","PeriodicalId":226788,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings RAWCON 98. 1998 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.98EX194)","volume":"80 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-08-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of antenna diversity schemes\",\"authors\":\"B. Gavilanes-Loureiro, I. De Coster, E. V. Van Lil, F. Pérez-Fontán\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAWCON.1998.709161\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares 4 kinds of simple diversity schemes for an indoor scenario at 2.4 GHz: polarisation, dual antenna, antenna and polarisation, and triple antenna for an indoor scenario, all combined according to 5 different techniques. Useful parameters are extracted statistically. We conclude that the power combining method gives the best results, and that the extra complexity of the 3 antenna case is not always justified from a cost viewpoint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":226788,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings RAWCON 98. 1998 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.98EX194)\",\"volume\":\"80 4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-08-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings RAWCON 98. 1998 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.98EX194)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAWCON.1998.709161\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings RAWCON 98. 1998 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.98EX194)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAWCON.1998.709161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

本文比较了2.4 GHz室内场景下的4种简单分集方案:极化分集、双天线分集、天线和极化分集以及室内场景下的三天线分集，并根据5种不同的技术组合在一起。统计提取有用的参数。我们得出结论，功率组合方法给出了最好的结果，并且从成本的角度来看，3天线情况的额外复杂性并不总是合理的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Comparison of antenna diversity schemes

This paper compares 4 kinds of simple diversity schemes for an indoor scenario at 2.4 GHz: polarisation, dual antenna, antenna and polarisation, and triple antenna for an indoor scenario, all combined according to 5 different techniques. Useful parameters are extracted statistically. We conclude that the power combining method gives the best results, and that the extra complexity of the 3 antenna case is not always justified from a cost viewpoint.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Proceedings RAWCON 98. 1998 IEEE Radio and Wireless Conference (Cat. No.98EX194)

自引率

0.00%

发文量