Y. Yu, T. Tun, A. Tedeschi, V. N. Franqueira, B. Nuseibeh
{"title":"OpenArgue:支持论证以发展安全的软件系统","authors":"Y. Yu, T. Tun, A. Tedeschi, V. N. Franqueira, B. Nuseibeh","doi":"10.1109/RE.2011.6051671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When software systems are verified against security requirements, formal and informal arguments provide a structure for organizing the software artifacts. Our recent work on the evolution of security-critical software systems demonstrates that our argumentation technique is useful in limiting the scope of change and in identifying changes to security properties. In support of this work, we have developed OpenArgue, a tool for syntax checking, visualizing, formalizing, and reasoning about incremental arguments. OpenArgue has been integrated with requirements engineering tools for Problem Frames and i∗, and applied to an Air Traffic Management (ATM) case study.","PeriodicalId":385129,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OpenArgue: Supporting argumentation to evolve secure software systems\",\"authors\":\"Y. Yu, T. Tun, A. Tedeschi, V. N. Franqueira, B. Nuseibeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RE.2011.6051671\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When software systems are verified against security requirements, formal and informal arguments provide a structure for organizing the software artifacts. Our recent work on the evolution of security-critical software systems demonstrates that our argumentation technique is useful in limiting the scope of change and in identifying changes to security properties. In support of this work, we have developed OpenArgue, a tool for syntax checking, visualizing, formalizing, and reasoning about incremental arguments. OpenArgue has been integrated with requirements engineering tools for Problem Frames and i∗, and applied to an Air Traffic Management (ATM) case study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":385129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2011.6051671\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE 19th International Requirements Engineering Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RE.2011.6051671","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
OpenArgue: Supporting argumentation to evolve secure software systems
When software systems are verified against security requirements, formal and informal arguments provide a structure for organizing the software artifacts. Our recent work on the evolution of security-critical software systems demonstrates that our argumentation technique is useful in limiting the scope of change and in identifying changes to security properties. In support of this work, we have developed OpenArgue, a tool for syntax checking, visualizing, formalizing, and reasoning about incremental arguments. OpenArgue has been integrated with requirements engineering tools for Problem Frames and i∗, and applied to an Air Traffic Management (ATM) case study.