熟练度检验中肠杆菌科计数的不确定度评定与分析

Xiu-ting Chang, Sui-shan Yang, Xiao-ju Luo, Zhu Meng, Li-dan Kou, Zuo-rong Xie
{"title":"熟练度检验中肠杆菌科计数的不确定度评定与分析","authors":"Xiu-ting Chang, Sui-shan Yang, Xiao-ju Luo, Zhu Meng, Li-dan Kou, Zuo-rong Xie","doi":"10.57237/j.wjfse.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Objective: To analyze and evaluate the uncertainty the results of the proficiency testing (ACAS-PT 1083 (2021)) of enterobacteriaceae count. Methods: According to the operational instructions of capability verification and GB 4789.41-2016 National food safety standard-Food microbiology test-Enterobacteriaceae count, the enterobacteriaceae of the capability verification sample were tested quantitatively. The suspected colonies were identified by VITEK2. The uncertainty of test results was assessed in accordance with JJF 1059.1-2012 and GB/T 27418-2017 Evaluation and expression of measurement uncertainty. Results: The test result of sample 21-Q997 was 4.2 ×10 3 CFU/mL. The test results were satisfactory as the Z values of the proficiency test was -0.8 (|Z|","PeriodicalId":446509,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Food Science and Engineering","volume":"82 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty Evaluation and Analysis of Enterobacteriaceae Count in Proficiency Testing\",\"authors\":\"Xiu-ting Chang, Sui-shan Yang, Xiao-ju Luo, Zhu Meng, Li-dan Kou, Zuo-rong Xie\",\"doi\":\"10.57237/j.wjfse.2023.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Objective: To analyze and evaluate the uncertainty the results of the proficiency testing (ACAS-PT 1083 (2021)) of enterobacteriaceae count. Methods: According to the operational instructions of capability verification and GB 4789.41-2016 National food safety standard-Food microbiology test-Enterobacteriaceae count, the enterobacteriaceae of the capability verification sample were tested quantitatively. The suspected colonies were identified by VITEK2. The uncertainty of test results was assessed in accordance with JJF 1059.1-2012 and GB/T 27418-2017 Evaluation and expression of measurement uncertainty. Results: The test result of sample 21-Q997 was 4.2 ×10 3 CFU/mL. The test results were satisfactory as the Z values of the proficiency test was -0.8 (|Z|\",\"PeriodicalId\":446509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Food Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"82 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Food Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57237/j.wjfse.2023.02.001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Food Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57237/j.wjfse.2023.02.001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:对肠杆菌科细菌计数能力检验(ACAS-PT 1083(2021))结果的不确定度进行分析和评价。方法:根据能力验证操作指导书和GB 4789.41-2016食品安全国家标准《食品微生物学试验-肠杆菌科计数》,对能力验证样品的肠杆菌科进行定量检测。用VITEK2对可疑菌落进行鉴定。试验结果的不确定度按照JJF 1059.1-2012和GB/T 27418-2017《测量不确定度评定与表达》进行评定。结果:样品21-Q997的检测结果为4.2 ×10 3 CFU/mL。测试结果令人满意,熟练度测试Z值为-0.8 (|Z|)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Uncertainty Evaluation and Analysis of Enterobacteriaceae Count in Proficiency Testing
: Objective: To analyze and evaluate the uncertainty the results of the proficiency testing (ACAS-PT 1083 (2021)) of enterobacteriaceae count. Methods: According to the operational instructions of capability verification and GB 4789.41-2016 National food safety standard-Food microbiology test-Enterobacteriaceae count, the enterobacteriaceae of the capability verification sample were tested quantitatively. The suspected colonies were identified by VITEK2. The uncertainty of test results was assessed in accordance with JJF 1059.1-2012 and GB/T 27418-2017 Evaluation and expression of measurement uncertainty. Results: The test result of sample 21-Q997 was 4.2 ×10 3 CFU/mL. The test results were satisfactory as the Z values of the proficiency test was -0.8 (|Z|
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信