A. Whitelock-Wainwright, Yi-Shan Tsai, Kayley M. Lyons, Svetlana Kaliff, Mike Bryant, K. Ryan, D. Gašević
{"title":"混合学习设计的学科差异:一项网络分析研究","authors":"A. Whitelock-Wainwright, Yi-Shan Tsai, Kayley M. Lyons, Svetlana Kaliff, Mike Bryant, K. Ryan, D. Gašević","doi":"10.1145/3375462.3375488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning design research has predominately relied upon survey- and interview-based methodologies, both of which are subject to limitations of social desirability and recall. An alternative approach is offered in this manuscript, whereby physical and online learning activity data is analysed using Epistemic Network Analysis. Using a sample of 6,040 course offerings from 10 faculties across a four year period (2016--2019), the utility of networks to understand learning design is illustrated. Specifically, through the adoption of a network analytic approach, the following was found: universities are clearly committed to blended learning, but there are considerable differences both between and within disciplines.","PeriodicalId":355800,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"08 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Disciplinary differences in blended learning design: a network analytic study\",\"authors\":\"A. Whitelock-Wainwright, Yi-Shan Tsai, Kayley M. Lyons, Svetlana Kaliff, Mike Bryant, K. Ryan, D. Gašević\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3375462.3375488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning design research has predominately relied upon survey- and interview-based methodologies, both of which are subject to limitations of social desirability and recall. An alternative approach is offered in this manuscript, whereby physical and online learning activity data is analysed using Epistemic Network Analysis. Using a sample of 6,040 course offerings from 10 faculties across a four year period (2016--2019), the utility of networks to understand learning design is illustrated. Specifically, through the adoption of a network analytic approach, the following was found: universities are clearly committed to blended learning, but there are considerable differences both between and within disciplines.\",\"PeriodicalId\":355800,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"08 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375488\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Tenth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3375462.3375488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Disciplinary differences in blended learning design: a network analytic study
Learning design research has predominately relied upon survey- and interview-based methodologies, both of which are subject to limitations of social desirability and recall. An alternative approach is offered in this manuscript, whereby physical and online learning activity data is analysed using Epistemic Network Analysis. Using a sample of 6,040 course offerings from 10 faculties across a four year period (2016--2019), the utility of networks to understand learning design is illustrated. Specifically, through the adoption of a network analytic approach, the following was found: universities are clearly committed to blended learning, but there are considerable differences both between and within disciplines.