下围棋时的一些认知偏差或者行为经济学如何教会我们如何成为更好的棋手

Laura Avram
{"title":"下围棋时的一些认知偏差或者行为经济学如何教会我们如何成为更好的棋手","authors":"Laura Avram","doi":"10.24193/RVM.2018.11.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As human beings, we have cognitive limitations which in diverse contexts and on a regular basis stop us from taking the best decisions. Some of our cognitive biases are caused by our cognitive limitations, some by the fact that we give more importance than necessary to unimportant things (e.g., framing). Acknowledging the existence of biases and using debiasing techniques might be useful for reaching a better understanding of games like Go. For behavioral economists, Go players could be an interesting group to experiment on because of their particular characteristics (see, e.g., Rieger and Wang, 2016).","PeriodicalId":190185,"journal":{"name":"Virgil Madgearu Review of Economic Studies and Research","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Some cognitive biases during go-playing or how behavioral economics could teach us how to be better go players\",\"authors\":\"Laura Avram\",\"doi\":\"10.24193/RVM.2018.11.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As human beings, we have cognitive limitations which in diverse contexts and on a regular basis stop us from taking the best decisions. Some of our cognitive biases are caused by our cognitive limitations, some by the fact that we give more importance than necessary to unimportant things (e.g., framing). Acknowledging the existence of biases and using debiasing techniques might be useful for reaching a better understanding of games like Go. For behavioral economists, Go players could be an interesting group to experiment on because of their particular characteristics (see, e.g., Rieger and Wang, 2016).\",\"PeriodicalId\":190185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virgil Madgearu Review of Economic Studies and Research\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virgil Madgearu Review of Economic Studies and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24193/RVM.2018.11.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virgil Madgearu Review of Economic Studies and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/RVM.2018.11.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为人类,我们有认知上的局限,这在不同的情况下经常会阻止我们做出最好的决定。我们的一些认知偏差是由我们的认知局限性引起的,有些是由于我们对不重要的事情给予了比必要的更多的重视(例如,框架)。承认偏见的存在并使用消除偏见的技术可能有助于更好地理解像围棋这样的游戏。对于行为经济学家来说,围棋玩家可能是一个有趣的实验群体,因为他们有自己的特点(参见Rieger和Wang, 2016)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Some cognitive biases during go-playing or how behavioral economics could teach us how to be better go players
As human beings, we have cognitive limitations which in diverse contexts and on a regular basis stop us from taking the best decisions. Some of our cognitive biases are caused by our cognitive limitations, some by the fact that we give more importance than necessary to unimportant things (e.g., framing). Acknowledging the existence of biases and using debiasing techniques might be useful for reaching a better understanding of games like Go. For behavioral economists, Go players could be an interesting group to experiment on because of their particular characteristics (see, e.g., Rieger and Wang, 2016).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信