{"title":"O(log n) RMR中的群互斥","authors":"V. Bhatt, Chien-Chung Huang","doi":"10.1145/1835698.1835708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present an algorithm to solve the group mutual exclusion, problem in the cache-coherent (CC) model. For the same problem in the distributed shared memory (DSM) model, Danek and Hadzilacos presented algorithms of O(n) remote memory references (RMR) and proved a matching lower bound, where n is the number of processes. We show that in the CC model, using registers and LL/SC variables, our algorithm achieves O(min(log n,k)) RMR, where k is the point contention, which is so far the best. Moreover, given a recent result of Attiya, Hendler and Woelfel showing that exclusion problems have a Ω(log n) RME lower bound using registers, comparison primitives and LL/SC variables, our algorithm thus achieves the best theoretical bound.","PeriodicalId":447863,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group mutual exclusion in O(log n) RMR\",\"authors\":\"V. Bhatt, Chien-Chung Huang\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1835698.1835708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We present an algorithm to solve the group mutual exclusion, problem in the cache-coherent (CC) model. For the same problem in the distributed shared memory (DSM) model, Danek and Hadzilacos presented algorithms of O(n) remote memory references (RMR) and proved a matching lower bound, where n is the number of processes. We show that in the CC model, using registers and LL/SC variables, our algorithm achieves O(min(log n,k)) RMR, where k is the point contention, which is so far the best. Moreover, given a recent result of Attiya, Hendler and Woelfel showing that exclusion problems have a Ω(log n) RME lower bound using registers, comparison primitives and LL/SC variables, our algorithm thus achieves the best theoretical bound.\",\"PeriodicalId\":447863,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"20\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1835698.1835708\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1835698.1835708","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
We present an algorithm to solve the group mutual exclusion, problem in the cache-coherent (CC) model. For the same problem in the distributed shared memory (DSM) model, Danek and Hadzilacos presented algorithms of O(n) remote memory references (RMR) and proved a matching lower bound, where n is the number of processes. We show that in the CC model, using registers and LL/SC variables, our algorithm achieves O(min(log n,k)) RMR, where k is the point contention, which is so far the best. Moreover, given a recent result of Attiya, Hendler and Woelfel showing that exclusion problems have a Ω(log n) RME lower bound using registers, comparison primitives and LL/SC variables, our algorithm thus achieves the best theoretical bound.