为什么学生放弃计算机科学:用动机模型来理解学生的流失和保留

M. Barr, Maria Kallia
{"title":"为什么学生放弃计算机科学:用动机模型来理解学生的流失和保留","authors":"M. Barr, Maria Kallia","doi":"10.1145/3564721.3564733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Computing science (CS) classrooms, whether at school or university level, provide a useful context for examining disparities in participation: particular groups – especially females – remain under-represented. Among the factors that influence retention in CS are those associated with motivation. In this study, we investigate why students drop CS by drawing on two motivation models: the expectancy–value model developed by Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues, and Marsh’s internal/external frame of reference model. Through a survey of 32 undergraduate students who dropped CS, we identify and discuss the factors that affected their decision to do so. We highlight the interplay between components of both models, revealing how utility value, cost, and students’ internal/external comparisons influenced their decision to drop the subject. We find that comparisons with peers, social concerns, perceived subject difficulty, and issues of attainment associated with self-concept all play a more significant role in female students’ decision to drop CS.","PeriodicalId":149708,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","volume":"283 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why Students Drop Computing Science: Using Models of Motivation to Understand Student Attrition and Retention\",\"authors\":\"M. Barr, Maria Kallia\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3564721.3564733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Computing science (CS) classrooms, whether at school or university level, provide a useful context for examining disparities in participation: particular groups – especially females – remain under-represented. Among the factors that influence retention in CS are those associated with motivation. In this study, we investigate why students drop CS by drawing on two motivation models: the expectancy–value model developed by Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues, and Marsh’s internal/external frame of reference model. Through a survey of 32 undergraduate students who dropped CS, we identify and discuss the factors that affected their decision to do so. We highlight the interplay between components of both models, revealing how utility value, cost, and students’ internal/external comparisons influenced their decision to drop the subject. We find that comparisons with peers, social concerns, perceived subject difficulty, and issues of attainment associated with self-concept all play a more significant role in female students’ decision to drop CS.\",\"PeriodicalId\":149708,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research\",\"volume\":\"283 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564721.3564733\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 22nd Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3564721.3564733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

计算机科学(CS)的课堂,无论是在中学还是在大学,都为研究参与方面的差异提供了一个有用的背景:特定群体——尤其是女性——仍然没有得到充分的代表。在影响计算机科学留任的因素中,与动机有关的因素是主要的。在本研究中,我们通过借鉴两种动机模型来调查学生放弃计算机科学的原因:Eccles、Wigfield等人开发的期望值模型和Marsh的内部/外部参考框架模型。通过对32名放弃CS的本科生的调查,我们确定并讨论了影响他们决定这样做的因素。我们强调了两个模型组成部分之间的相互作用,揭示了效用价值、成本和学生的内部/外部比较如何影响他们放弃这门学科的决定。我们发现,与同伴的比较、社会关注、学科难度感知以及与自我概念相关的成就问题在女生放弃计算机科学的决定中起着更重要的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why Students Drop Computing Science: Using Models of Motivation to Understand Student Attrition and Retention
Computing science (CS) classrooms, whether at school or university level, provide a useful context for examining disparities in participation: particular groups – especially females – remain under-represented. Among the factors that influence retention in CS are those associated with motivation. In this study, we investigate why students drop CS by drawing on two motivation models: the expectancy–value model developed by Eccles, Wigfield, and colleagues, and Marsh’s internal/external frame of reference model. Through a survey of 32 undergraduate students who dropped CS, we identify and discuss the factors that affected their decision to do so. We highlight the interplay between components of both models, revealing how utility value, cost, and students’ internal/external comparisons influenced their decision to drop the subject. We find that comparisons with peers, social concerns, perceived subject difficulty, and issues of attainment associated with self-concept all play a more significant role in female students’ decision to drop CS.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信