单腿着地时,足部着地方式对下肢运动学、动力学和能量吸收的影响

Ji-Man Jeong, Choongsoo S. Shin
{"title":"单腿着地时,足部着地方式对下肢运动学、动力学和能量吸收的影响","authors":"Ji-Man Jeong, Choongsoo S. Shin","doi":"10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Here, landing type is divided into forefoot landing, in the toes the ground first, rearfoot landing, in which the heel touches the ground first. A previous study analyzed video of ACL injuries during athletic competition found that athletes landed rearfoot at the time of injuries, and reported that rearfoot landing Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of foot landing type (forefoot vs. rearfoot landing) on kinematics, kinetics, and energy absorption of hip, knee, and ankle joints. Method: Twenty-five healthy men performed single-leg landings with two different foot landing types: forefoot and rearfoot landing. A motion-capture system equipped with eight infrared cameras and a synchronized force plate embedded in the floor was used. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic parameters were compared using paired two-tailed Student's t -tests at a significance level of .05. Results: On initial contact, a greater knee flexion angle was shown during rearfoot landing ( p < .001), but the lower knee flexion angle was found at peak vertical ground reaction force (GRF) ( p < .001). On initial contact, ankles showed plantarflexion, inversion, and external rotation during forefoot landing, while dorsiflexion, eversion, and internal rotation were shown during rearfoot landing ( p < .001, all). At peak vertical GRF, the knee extension moment and ankle plantarflexion moment were lower in rearfoot landing than in forefoot landing ( p = .003 and p < .001, respectively). From initial contact to peak vertical GRF, the negative work of the hip, knee, and ankle joint was significantly reduced during rearfoot landing ( p < .001, all). The contribution to the total work of the ankle joint was the greatest during forefoot landing, whereas the contribution to the total work of the hip joint was the greatest during rearfoot landing. Conclusion: These results suggest that the energy absorption strategy was changed during rearfoot landing compared with forefoot landing according to lower-extremity joint kinematics and kinetics.","PeriodicalId":306685,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Foot Landing Type on Lower-extremity Kinematics, Kinetics, and Energy Absorption during Single-leg Landing\",\"authors\":\"Ji-Man Jeong, Choongsoo S. Shin\",\"doi\":\"10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Here, landing type is divided into forefoot landing, in the toes the ground first, rearfoot landing, in which the heel touches the ground first. A previous study analyzed video of ACL injuries during athletic competition found that athletes landed rearfoot at the time of injuries, and reported that rearfoot landing Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of foot landing type (forefoot vs. rearfoot landing) on kinematics, kinetics, and energy absorption of hip, knee, and ankle joints. Method: Twenty-five healthy men performed single-leg landings with two different foot landing types: forefoot and rearfoot landing. A motion-capture system equipped with eight infrared cameras and a synchronized force plate embedded in the floor was used. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic parameters were compared using paired two-tailed Student's t -tests at a significance level of .05. Results: On initial contact, a greater knee flexion angle was shown during rearfoot landing ( p < .001), but the lower knee flexion angle was found at peak vertical ground reaction force (GRF) ( p < .001). On initial contact, ankles showed plantarflexion, inversion, and external rotation during forefoot landing, while dorsiflexion, eversion, and internal rotation were shown during rearfoot landing ( p < .001, all). At peak vertical GRF, the knee extension moment and ankle plantarflexion moment were lower in rearfoot landing than in forefoot landing ( p = .003 and p < .001, respectively). From initial contact to peak vertical GRF, the negative work of the hip, knee, and ankle joint was significantly reduced during rearfoot landing ( p < .001, all). The contribution to the total work of the ankle joint was the greatest during forefoot landing, whereas the contribution to the total work of the hip joint was the greatest during rearfoot landing. Conclusion: These results suggest that the energy absorption strategy was changed during rearfoot landing compared with forefoot landing according to lower-extremity joint kinematics and kinetics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Sport Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5103/KJSB.2017.27.3.189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在这里,着地方式分为前脚着地,脚尖先着地,后脚着地,脚后跟先着地。先前有研究分析了运动比赛中ACL损伤的视频,发现运动员在受伤时后脚着地,并报道了后脚着地目的:本研究的目的是研究脚部着地类型(前脚着地与后脚着地)对髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的运动学、动力学和能量吸收的影响。方法:25名健康男性进行单腿着地,采用两种不同的足部着地方式:前脚着地和后脚着地。运动捕捉系统配备了8个红外摄像机,并在地板上嵌入了一个同步测力板。三维运动学和动力学参数的比较采用配对双尾Student's t检验,显著性水平为0.05。结果:在初始接触时,后脚着地时膝关节屈曲角度较大(p < 0.001),而在垂直地面反力(GRF)峰值时膝关节屈曲角度较低(p < 0.001)。初次接触时,前足着地时踝关节表现为跖屈、内翻和外旋,后足着地时踝关节表现为背屈、外翻和内旋(p < 0.001)。垂直GRF峰值时,后脚着地时膝关节伸直力矩和踝关节跖屈力矩均小于前脚着地时(p = 0.003和p < 0.001)。从初始接触到垂直GRF峰值,后脚着地时髋关节、膝关节和踝关节的负功明显减少(p < 0.001)。前足着地时踝关节对总功的贡献最大,后足着地时髋关节对总功的贡献最大。结论:与前脚着地相比,后脚着地时的能量吸收策略根据下肢关节运动学和动力学发生了变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Foot Landing Type on Lower-extremity Kinematics, Kinetics, and Energy Absorption during Single-leg Landing
Here, landing type is divided into forefoot landing, in the toes the ground first, rearfoot landing, in which the heel touches the ground first. A previous study analyzed video of ACL injuries during athletic competition found that athletes landed rearfoot at the time of injuries, and reported that rearfoot landing Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the effect of foot landing type (forefoot vs. rearfoot landing) on kinematics, kinetics, and energy absorption of hip, knee, and ankle joints. Method: Twenty-five healthy men performed single-leg landings with two different foot landing types: forefoot and rearfoot landing. A motion-capture system equipped with eight infrared cameras and a synchronized force plate embedded in the floor was used. Three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic parameters were compared using paired two-tailed Student's t -tests at a significance level of .05. Results: On initial contact, a greater knee flexion angle was shown during rearfoot landing ( p < .001), but the lower knee flexion angle was found at peak vertical ground reaction force (GRF) ( p < .001). On initial contact, ankles showed plantarflexion, inversion, and external rotation during forefoot landing, while dorsiflexion, eversion, and internal rotation were shown during rearfoot landing ( p < .001, all). At peak vertical GRF, the knee extension moment and ankle plantarflexion moment were lower in rearfoot landing than in forefoot landing ( p = .003 and p < .001, respectively). From initial contact to peak vertical GRF, the negative work of the hip, knee, and ankle joint was significantly reduced during rearfoot landing ( p < .001, all). The contribution to the total work of the ankle joint was the greatest during forefoot landing, whereas the contribution to the total work of the hip joint was the greatest during rearfoot landing. Conclusion: These results suggest that the energy absorption strategy was changed during rearfoot landing compared with forefoot landing according to lower-extremity joint kinematics and kinetics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信