{"title":"调整后的基于因素的绩效归因","authors":"Robert A. Stubbs, V. Jeet","doi":"10.3905/jpm.2016.42.5.067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Factor-based performance attribution is frequently used in the asset management industry in both understanding and assessing the management of a portfolio. Unfortunately, in many cases the inferences from a standard attribution report can be misleading. One cause of this is the misclassification of factor contributions as asset-specific contributions or vice versa, due to missing factors or biased factor exposure estimates. The authors propose an adjusted factor-based performance attribution methodology that corrects for some types of biases by shifting the portion of the asset-specific contribution that is correlated with the factor contributions back into the factor portion. The authors find that, from a practical perspective, the proposed methodology results in more intuitive attributions that provide stronger support of factor-based investment mandates.","PeriodicalId":214661,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","volume":"358 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjusted Factor-Based Performance Attribution\",\"authors\":\"Robert A. Stubbs, V. Jeet\",\"doi\":\"10.3905/jpm.2016.42.5.067\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Factor-based performance attribution is frequently used in the asset management industry in both understanding and assessing the management of a portfolio. Unfortunately, in many cases the inferences from a standard attribution report can be misleading. One cause of this is the misclassification of factor contributions as asset-specific contributions or vice versa, due to missing factors or biased factor exposure estimates. The authors propose an adjusted factor-based performance attribution methodology that corrects for some types of biases by shifting the portion of the asset-specific contribution that is correlated with the factor contributions back into the factor portion. The authors find that, from a practical perspective, the proposed methodology results in more intuitive attributions that provide stronger support of factor-based investment mandates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":214661,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"volume\":\"358 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Portfolio Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.42.5.067\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Portfolio Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.42.5.067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Factor-based performance attribution is frequently used in the asset management industry in both understanding and assessing the management of a portfolio. Unfortunately, in many cases the inferences from a standard attribution report can be misleading. One cause of this is the misclassification of factor contributions as asset-specific contributions or vice versa, due to missing factors or biased factor exposure estimates. The authors propose an adjusted factor-based performance attribution methodology that corrects for some types of biases by shifting the portion of the asset-specific contribution that is correlated with the factor contributions back into the factor portion. The authors find that, from a practical perspective, the proposed methodology results in more intuitive attributions that provide stronger support of factor-based investment mandates.