从商业到临床试验:对用于中央统计监测的欺诈检测方法的文献进行系统回顾

Maciej Fronc, M. Jakubczyk
{"title":"从商业到临床试验:对用于中央统计监测的欺诈检测方法的文献进行系统回顾","authors":"Maciej Fronc, M. Jakubczyk","doi":"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data-driven decisions can be suboptimal when the data are distorted by fraudulent behaviour. Fraud is a common occurrence in finance or other related industries, where large datasets are handled and motivation for financial gain may be high. In order to detect and prevent fraud, quantitative methods are used. Fraud, however, is also committed in other circumstances, e.g. during clinical trials. The article aims to verify which analytical fraud-detection methods used in finance may be adopted in the field of clinical trials. We systematically reviewed papers published over the last five years in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) from the field of economics, finance, management and business in general. We considered the broad scope of data mining techniques including artificial intelligence algorithms. As a result, 37 quantitative methods were identified with the potential of being fit for application in clinical trials. The methods were grouped into three categories: pre-processing techniques, supervised learning and unsupervised learning. Our findings may enhance the future use of fraud-detection methods in clinical trials.\n\n","PeriodicalId":357447,"journal":{"name":"Przegląd Statystyczny","volume":"122 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From business to clinical trials: a systematic review of the literature on fraud detection methods to be used in central statistical monitoring\",\"authors\":\"Maciej Fronc, M. Jakubczyk\",\"doi\":\"10.5604/01.3001.0016.1165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data-driven decisions can be suboptimal when the data are distorted by fraudulent behaviour. Fraud is a common occurrence in finance or other related industries, where large datasets are handled and motivation for financial gain may be high. In order to detect and prevent fraud, quantitative methods are used. Fraud, however, is also committed in other circumstances, e.g. during clinical trials. The article aims to verify which analytical fraud-detection methods used in finance may be adopted in the field of clinical trials. We systematically reviewed papers published over the last five years in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) from the field of economics, finance, management and business in general. We considered the broad scope of data mining techniques including artificial intelligence algorithms. As a result, 37 quantitative methods were identified with the potential of being fit for application in clinical trials. The methods were grouped into three categories: pre-processing techniques, supervised learning and unsupervised learning. Our findings may enhance the future use of fraud-detection methods in clinical trials.\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":357447,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Przegląd Statystyczny\",\"volume\":\"122 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Przegląd Statystyczny\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Przegląd Statystyczny","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0016.1165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

当数据被欺诈行为扭曲时,数据驱动的决策可能是次优的。欺诈在金融或其他相关行业很常见,在这些行业中,处理的数据集很大,获取经济利益的动机可能很高。为了发现和防止欺诈,使用了定量的方法。然而,在其他情况下,例如在临床试验期间,也存在欺诈行为。本文旨在验证金融学中使用的分析欺诈检测方法可用于临床试验领域。我们系统地回顾了过去五年在两个数据库(Scopus和Web of Science)中发表的论文,这些论文来自经济、金融、管理和商业领域。我们考虑了包括人工智能算法在内的数据挖掘技术的广泛范围。结果,37种定量方法被确定为适合应用于临床试验的潜力。方法分为预处理技术、监督学习和无监督学习三大类。我们的发现可能会在临床试验中加强欺诈检测方法的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From business to clinical trials: a systematic review of the literature on fraud detection methods to be used in central statistical monitoring
Data-driven decisions can be suboptimal when the data are distorted by fraudulent behaviour. Fraud is a common occurrence in finance or other related industries, where large datasets are handled and motivation for financial gain may be high. In order to detect and prevent fraud, quantitative methods are used. Fraud, however, is also committed in other circumstances, e.g. during clinical trials. The article aims to verify which analytical fraud-detection methods used in finance may be adopted in the field of clinical trials. We systematically reviewed papers published over the last five years in two databases (Scopus and Web of Science) from the field of economics, finance, management and business in general. We considered the broad scope of data mining techniques including artificial intelligence algorithms. As a result, 37 quantitative methods were identified with the potential of being fit for application in clinical trials. The methods were grouped into three categories: pre-processing techniques, supervised learning and unsupervised learning. Our findings may enhance the future use of fraud-detection methods in clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信