最优渐进年金化:量化转向年金的成本

W. Horneff, R. Maurer, Michael Stamos
{"title":"最优渐进年金化:量化转向年金的成本","authors":"W. Horneff, R. Maurer, Michael Stamos","doi":"10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00295.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We compute the optimal dynamic annuitization and asset allocation policy for a retiree with Epstein/Zin preferences, uncertain investment horizon, potential bequest motives, and pre-existing pension income. In our setting the retiree can decide each year how much he consumes and how much he invests in stocks, bonds, and life annuities, while the prior literature mostly considered restricted so-called deterministic or stochastic switching strategies. We show that postponing the annuity purchase is no longer optimal in the gradual annuitization case since investors are able to attain the optimal mix between liquid assets (stocks and bonds) and illiquid life-annuities each year. In order to assess potential utility losses, we benchmark various restricted annuitization strategies against the unrestricted gradual annuitization strategy.","PeriodicalId":315176,"journal":{"name":"Banking & Insurance","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Gradual Annuitization: Quantifying the Costs of Switching to Annuities\",\"authors\":\"W. Horneff, R. Maurer, Michael Stamos\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00295.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We compute the optimal dynamic annuitization and asset allocation policy for a retiree with Epstein/Zin preferences, uncertain investment horizon, potential bequest motives, and pre-existing pension income. In our setting the retiree can decide each year how much he consumes and how much he invests in stocks, bonds, and life annuities, while the prior literature mostly considered restricted so-called deterministic or stochastic switching strategies. We show that postponing the annuity purchase is no longer optimal in the gradual annuitization case since investors are able to attain the optimal mix between liquid assets (stocks and bonds) and illiquid life-annuities each year. In order to assess potential utility losses, we benchmark various restricted annuitization strategies against the unrestricted gradual annuitization strategy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":315176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Banking & Insurance\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"78\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Banking & Insurance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00295.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Banking & Insurance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6975.2008.00295.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

摘要

我们计算了具有Epstein/Zin偏好、不确定投资期限、潜在遗赠动机和已有养老金收入的退休人员的最优动态年金化和资产配置策略。在我们的设定中,退休人员可以决定每年消费多少,投资多少股票、债券和终身年金,而之前的文献大多考虑的是有限的所谓确定性或随机转换策略。我们发现,在逐步年金化的情况下,推迟购买年金不再是最优的,因为投资者每年都能获得流动性资产(股票和债券)和非流动性终身年金的最优组合。为了评估潜在的公用事业损失,我们将各种受限制的年化策略与不受限制的渐进年化策略进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal Gradual Annuitization: Quantifying the Costs of Switching to Annuities
We compute the optimal dynamic annuitization and asset allocation policy for a retiree with Epstein/Zin preferences, uncertain investment horizon, potential bequest motives, and pre-existing pension income. In our setting the retiree can decide each year how much he consumes and how much he invests in stocks, bonds, and life annuities, while the prior literature mostly considered restricted so-called deterministic or stochastic switching strategies. We show that postponing the annuity purchase is no longer optimal in the gradual annuitization case since investors are able to attain the optimal mix between liquid assets (stocks and bonds) and illiquid life-annuities each year. In order to assess potential utility losses, we benchmark various restricted annuitization strategies against the unrestricted gradual annuitization strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信