家务社会学重访:这么多年过去了,我只是一个家庭主妇

Tina Franklin, Toni Brennan
{"title":"家务社会学重访:这么多年过去了,我只是一个家庭主妇","authors":"Tina Franklin, Toni Brennan","doi":"10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.2.43","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This small study follows in the footsteps of Oakley’s (1974) The Sociology of Housework. Based on interviews with 40 London housewives more than 45 years after its publication, it is an exploration of the lived experience of five contemporary working class London housewives. Thematic Analysis revealed striking parallels with Oakley’s findings: nearly half a century later, gender ideologies are still restricting, damaging and confining some women into the home, with their work not acknowledged as work, with no independent selves, no control over finances and no way of meeting their personal needs.","PeriodicalId":253858,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The sociology of housework revisited: Just a housewife after all these years\",\"authors\":\"Tina Franklin, Toni Brennan\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.2.43\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This small study follows in the footsteps of Oakley’s (1974) The Sociology of Housework. Based on interviews with 40 London housewives more than 45 years after its publication, it is an exploration of the lived experience of five contemporary working class London housewives. Thematic Analysis revealed striking parallels with Oakley’s findings: nearly half a century later, gender ideologies are still restricting, damaging and confining some women into the home, with their work not acknowledged as work, with no independent selves, no control over finances and no way of meeting their personal needs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":253858,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.2.43\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Women and Equalities Section Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpspowe.2021.4.2.43","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项小型研究遵循了Oakley(1974)的《家务社会学》的脚步。该书出版45年后,以对40位伦敦家庭主妇的采访为基础,对五位当代伦敦工人阶级家庭主妇的生活经历进行了探索。《主题分析》揭示了与奥克利的发现惊人的相似之处:近半个世纪后,性别意识形态仍然在限制、破坏和限制一些女性待在家里,她们的工作不被认为是工作,没有独立的自我,无法控制财务状况,无法满足个人需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The sociology of housework revisited: Just a housewife after all these years
This small study follows in the footsteps of Oakley’s (1974) The Sociology of Housework. Based on interviews with 40 London housewives more than 45 years after its publication, it is an exploration of the lived experience of five contemporary working class London housewives. Thematic Analysis revealed striking parallels with Oakley’s findings: nearly half a century later, gender ideologies are still restricting, damaging and confining some women into the home, with their work not acknowledged as work, with no independent selves, no control over finances and no way of meeting their personal needs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信