软件数据集分析技术的研究

L. Pickard, B. Kitchenham, Susan Linkman
{"title":"软件数据集分析技术的研究","authors":"L. Pickard, B. Kitchenham, Susan Linkman","doi":"10.1109/METRIC.1999.809734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The goal of the study was to investigate the efficacy of different data analysis techniques for software data. We used simulation to create datasets with a known underlying model and with non-Normal characteristics that are frequently found in software datasets: skewness, unstable variance, and outliers and combinations of these characteristics. We investigated three main statistically based data analysis techniques: residual analysis; multivariate regression; classification and regression trees (CART). In addition to the standard \"least squares\" version of the technique, we also investigated robust and nonparametric versions of the techniques. We found that standard multivariate regression techniques were best if the data only exhibited skewness. However, under more extreme conditions such as severe heteroscedasticity, the nonparametric residual analysis technique performed best. We also found that even when the analysis technique did not accurately recreate the true underlying model, the faulty model could generate reasonably good predictions. The study indicates that simulation is very useful technique for evaluating different data analysis techniques.","PeriodicalId":372331,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403)","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"75","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An investigation of analysis techniques for software datasets\",\"authors\":\"L. Pickard, B. Kitchenham, Susan Linkman\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/METRIC.1999.809734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The goal of the study was to investigate the efficacy of different data analysis techniques for software data. We used simulation to create datasets with a known underlying model and with non-Normal characteristics that are frequently found in software datasets: skewness, unstable variance, and outliers and combinations of these characteristics. We investigated three main statistically based data analysis techniques: residual analysis; multivariate regression; classification and regression trees (CART). In addition to the standard \\\"least squares\\\" version of the technique, we also investigated robust and nonparametric versions of the techniques. We found that standard multivariate regression techniques were best if the data only exhibited skewness. However, under more extreme conditions such as severe heteroscedasticity, the nonparametric residual analysis technique performed best. We also found that even when the analysis technique did not accurately recreate the true underlying model, the faulty model could generate reasonably good predictions. The study indicates that simulation is very useful technique for evaluating different data analysis techniques.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"75\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.1999.809734\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.1999.809734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 75

摘要

本研究的目的是调查不同数据分析技术对软件数据的有效性。我们使用模拟来创建具有已知底层模型和非正态特征的数据集,这些特征在软件数据集中经常发现:偏度、不稳定方差、异常值和这些特征的组合。我们研究了三种主要的基于统计的数据分析技术:残差分析;多元回归;分类回归树(CART)。除了该技术的标准“最小二乘”版本外,我们还研究了该技术的鲁棒和非参数版本。我们发现,如果数据只显示偏度,标准的多元回归技术是最好的。然而,在更极端的条件下,如严重的异方差,非参数残差分析技术表现最好。我们还发现,即使分析技术不能准确地重建真正的底层模型,错误的模型也可以产生相当好的预测。研究表明,仿真是评价不同数据分析技术的一种非常有用的技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An investigation of analysis techniques for software datasets
The goal of the study was to investigate the efficacy of different data analysis techniques for software data. We used simulation to create datasets with a known underlying model and with non-Normal characteristics that are frequently found in software datasets: skewness, unstable variance, and outliers and combinations of these characteristics. We investigated three main statistically based data analysis techniques: residual analysis; multivariate regression; classification and regression trees (CART). In addition to the standard "least squares" version of the technique, we also investigated robust and nonparametric versions of the techniques. We found that standard multivariate regression techniques were best if the data only exhibited skewness. However, under more extreme conditions such as severe heteroscedasticity, the nonparametric residual analysis technique performed best. We also found that even when the analysis technique did not accurately recreate the true underlying model, the faulty model could generate reasonably good predictions. The study indicates that simulation is very useful technique for evaluating different data analysis techniques.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信