用稳态流法测量应力相关致密岩石渗透性的有效实验室方法

J. Zhang, Hui-Hai Liu, Jewel Duncan
{"title":"用稳态流法测量应力相关致密岩石渗透性的有效实验室方法","authors":"J. Zhang, Hui-Hai Liu, Jewel Duncan","doi":"10.30632/pjv63n5-2022a3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The matrix permeability of tight formations is important for many geological and engineering applications, such as CO2 geological sequestration, disposal of nuclear waste, and production of unconventional hydrocarbon and coalbed methane. In the case of hydrocarbon production, the reservoir permeability decreases with decreasing pore pressure or increasing effective stress. Laboratory characterization of the relationship between matrix permeability and effective stress (and pore pressure) is generally time consuming since the current methods are based on the so-called point-by-point approach that measures one permeability data point only with one test run, and the relationship is generally represented with multiple data points. In this paper, we present a method to determine matrix permeability, its relationship with effective stress, and the Biot coefficient of a tight rock sample with three steady-state flow test runs using large pressure gradients. Unlike the traditional steady-state flow method based on linear flow theories, analytical results based on a nonlinear flow theory are used for determining the related relationship and parameters. The gas properties and permeability along the core sample vary with gas pressure and effective stress, while the traditional method treats them as constants for a given test run. To get the same set of parameters, our method only requires three test runs, and each test run of our method takes a much shorter time than the traditional method because our method is based on nonlinear flow theory and thus allows for the use of large pressure gradients. Comparisons of the permeability measurements with those obtained using traditional methods and numerical simulations demonstrate that our new method can get satisfactory results.","PeriodicalId":170688,"journal":{"name":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Efficient Laboratory Method to Measure Stress-Dependent Tight Rock Permeability With the Steady-State Flow Method\",\"authors\":\"J. Zhang, Hui-Hai Liu, Jewel Duncan\",\"doi\":\"10.30632/pjv63n5-2022a3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The matrix permeability of tight formations is important for many geological and engineering applications, such as CO2 geological sequestration, disposal of nuclear waste, and production of unconventional hydrocarbon and coalbed methane. In the case of hydrocarbon production, the reservoir permeability decreases with decreasing pore pressure or increasing effective stress. Laboratory characterization of the relationship between matrix permeability and effective stress (and pore pressure) is generally time consuming since the current methods are based on the so-called point-by-point approach that measures one permeability data point only with one test run, and the relationship is generally represented with multiple data points. In this paper, we present a method to determine matrix permeability, its relationship with effective stress, and the Biot coefficient of a tight rock sample with three steady-state flow test runs using large pressure gradients. Unlike the traditional steady-state flow method based on linear flow theories, analytical results based on a nonlinear flow theory are used for determining the related relationship and parameters. The gas properties and permeability along the core sample vary with gas pressure and effective stress, while the traditional method treats them as constants for a given test run. To get the same set of parameters, our method only requires three test runs, and each test run of our method takes a much shorter time than the traditional method because our method is based on nonlinear flow theory and thus allows for the use of large pressure gradients. Comparisons of the permeability measurements with those obtained using traditional methods and numerical simulations demonstrate that our new method can get satisfactory results.\",\"PeriodicalId\":170688,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv63n5-2022a3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petrophysics – The SPWLA Journal of Formation Evaluation and Reservoir Description","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30632/pjv63n5-2022a3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

致密地层的基质渗透率对于许多地质和工程应用都很重要,例如二氧化碳地质封存、核废料处理、非常规油气和煤层气的生产。在油气生产的情况下,随着孔隙压力的减小或有效应力的增大,储层渗透率降低。实验室表征基质渗透率与有效应力(和孔隙压力)之间的关系通常是耗时的,因为目前的方法是基于所谓的逐点方法,即在一次测试中只测量一个渗透率数据点,并且这种关系通常用多个数据点表示。在本文中,我们提出了一种方法来确定基质渗透率,其与有效应力的关系,并通过三次大压力梯度的稳态流动试验来确定致密岩石样品的Biot系数。与传统的基于线性流动理论的稳态流动方法不同,采用基于非线性流动理论的分析结果来确定相关关系和参数。沿岩心样品的气体性质和渗透率随气体压力和有效应力的变化而变化,而传统方法将它们视为给定测试运行的常数。为了获得相同的参数集,我们的方法只需要三次试运行,并且由于我们的方法基于非线性流动理论,因此允许使用较大的压力梯度,因此我们的方法每次试运行所需的时间比传统方法短得多。通过与传统方法的渗透率测量结果和数值模拟结果的比较,证明了新方法的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Efficient Laboratory Method to Measure Stress-Dependent Tight Rock Permeability With the Steady-State Flow Method
The matrix permeability of tight formations is important for many geological and engineering applications, such as CO2 geological sequestration, disposal of nuclear waste, and production of unconventional hydrocarbon and coalbed methane. In the case of hydrocarbon production, the reservoir permeability decreases with decreasing pore pressure or increasing effective stress. Laboratory characterization of the relationship between matrix permeability and effective stress (and pore pressure) is generally time consuming since the current methods are based on the so-called point-by-point approach that measures one permeability data point only with one test run, and the relationship is generally represented with multiple data points. In this paper, we present a method to determine matrix permeability, its relationship with effective stress, and the Biot coefficient of a tight rock sample with three steady-state flow test runs using large pressure gradients. Unlike the traditional steady-state flow method based on linear flow theories, analytical results based on a nonlinear flow theory are used for determining the related relationship and parameters. The gas properties and permeability along the core sample vary with gas pressure and effective stress, while the traditional method treats them as constants for a given test run. To get the same set of parameters, our method only requires three test runs, and each test run of our method takes a much shorter time than the traditional method because our method is based on nonlinear flow theory and thus allows for the use of large pressure gradients. Comparisons of the permeability measurements with those obtained using traditional methods and numerical simulations demonstrate that our new method can get satisfactory results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信