使用CNN与支持向量机进行皮肤癌分类的比较

S. Likhitha, R. Baskar
{"title":"使用CNN与支持向量机进行皮肤癌分类的比较","authors":"S. Likhitha, R. Baskar","doi":"10.1109/SMART55829.2022.10047280","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Using the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithm to perform unique classification of skin cancer and evaluating the performance of the SVM approach. n this research work, skin cancer detection has been carried out using algorithms such as CNN and SVM and the accuracy was determined for the same. Two groups are statistically analyzed with the sample size 20 for both the groups, with a pretest g power of 80%. When the CNN algorithm's performance is examined, it is found that the accuracy is 95.03% for CNN and 93.04% for the SVM algorithm. The sample size will be computed using the mean, standard deviation, and standard error, as well as the independent samples test if the significance is less than one. According to the statistical data, the algorithm's accuracy (0.490), specificity (0.009), and p>0.05 significant values are all p0.05. The result shows that CNN algorithm's accuracy was better than SVM algorithm for skin cancer detection.","PeriodicalId":431639,"journal":{"name":"2022 11th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)","volume":"158 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Skin Cancer Classification using CNN in Comparison with Support Vector Machine for Better Accuracy\",\"authors\":\"S. Likhitha, R. Baskar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SMART55829.2022.10047280\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Using the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithm to perform unique classification of skin cancer and evaluating the performance of the SVM approach. n this research work, skin cancer detection has been carried out using algorithms such as CNN and SVM and the accuracy was determined for the same. Two groups are statistically analyzed with the sample size 20 for both the groups, with a pretest g power of 80%. When the CNN algorithm's performance is examined, it is found that the accuracy is 95.03% for CNN and 93.04% for the SVM algorithm. The sample size will be computed using the mean, standard deviation, and standard error, as well as the independent samples test if the significance is less than one. According to the statistical data, the algorithm's accuracy (0.490), specificity (0.009), and p>0.05 significant values are all p0.05. The result shows that CNN algorithm's accuracy was better than SVM algorithm for skin cancer detection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":431639,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 11th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)\",\"volume\":\"158 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 11th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMART55829.2022.10047280\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 11th International Conference on System Modeling & Advancement in Research Trends (SMART)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SMART55829.2022.10047280","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

使用卷积神经网络(CNN)算法对皮肤癌进行独特的分类,并评估支持向量机方法的性能。在本研究工作中,使用CNN和SVM等算法进行皮肤癌检测,并确定其准确率。对两组进行统计分析,两组的样本量均为20,预试g功率为80%。当对CNN算法的性能进行检验时,发现CNN的准确率为95.03%,SVM算法的准确率为93.04%。样本量将使用均值、标准差和标准误差计算,如果显著性小于1,则使用独立样本检验。统计数据显示,该算法的准确率(0.490)、特异性(0.009)、p>0.05显著值均为p0.05。结果表明,CNN算法在皮肤癌检测上的准确率优于SVM算法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Skin Cancer Classification using CNN in Comparison with Support Vector Machine for Better Accuracy
Using the Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) algorithm to perform unique classification of skin cancer and evaluating the performance of the SVM approach. n this research work, skin cancer detection has been carried out using algorithms such as CNN and SVM and the accuracy was determined for the same. Two groups are statistically analyzed with the sample size 20 for both the groups, with a pretest g power of 80%. When the CNN algorithm's performance is examined, it is found that the accuracy is 95.03% for CNN and 93.04% for the SVM algorithm. The sample size will be computed using the mean, standard deviation, and standard error, as well as the independent samples test if the significance is less than one. According to the statistical data, the algorithm's accuracy (0.490), specificity (0.009), and p>0.05 significant values are all p0.05. The result shows that CNN algorithm's accuracy was better than SVM algorithm for skin cancer detection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信