多代理会议调度机制设计,包括时间偏好、可用性和出席值

Elisabeth Crawford, M. Veloso
{"title":"多代理会议调度机制设计,包括时间偏好、可用性和出席值","authors":"Elisabeth Crawford, M. Veloso","doi":"10.1109/IAT.2004.1342952","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We examine the benefits and limitations of mechanism design as it applies to multi-agent meeting scheduling. We look at the problem of scheduling multiple meetings between various groups of agents that arise over time. Each of the agents has private information regarding their tune preferences for meetings. Our aim is to extract this information and assign the meetings to times in a way that maximises social welfare. We discuss problems with previous attempts to design incentive compatible (IC) and individually rational (IR) mechanisms for the task. We focus on the problem of determining when agents are available. In particular, we show that when agents with general valuation functions are asked to supply their availability for meeting times, there is no IC and IR mechanism. Given this impossibility result, we show how the likelihood of violating IR can be reduced through agents expressing their value for the presence of others at meetings. We also show how requesting agent preferences for entire schedules helps to eliminate IC problems.","PeriodicalId":281008,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2004. (IAT 2004).","volume":"130 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mechanism design for multi-agent meeting scheduling including time preferences, availability, and value of presence\",\"authors\":\"Elisabeth Crawford, M. Veloso\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IAT.2004.1342952\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We examine the benefits and limitations of mechanism design as it applies to multi-agent meeting scheduling. We look at the problem of scheduling multiple meetings between various groups of agents that arise over time. Each of the agents has private information regarding their tune preferences for meetings. Our aim is to extract this information and assign the meetings to times in a way that maximises social welfare. We discuss problems with previous attempts to design incentive compatible (IC) and individually rational (IR) mechanisms for the task. We focus on the problem of determining when agents are available. In particular, we show that when agents with general valuation functions are asked to supply their availability for meeting times, there is no IC and IR mechanism. Given this impossibility result, we show how the likelihood of violating IR can be reduced through agents expressing their value for the presence of others at meetings. We also show how requesting agent preferences for entire schedules helps to eliminate IC problems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":281008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2004. (IAT 2004).\",\"volume\":\"130 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"17\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2004. (IAT 2004).\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAT.2004.1342952\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Intelligent Agent Technology, 2004. (IAT 2004).","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IAT.2004.1342952","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

摘要

我们研究了机制设计的优点和局限性,因为它适用于多代理会议调度。我们将研究随着时间的推移,在不同的代理组之间安排多个会议的问题。每个代理都有关于他们的会议偏好的私人信息。我们的目标是提取这些信息,并以最大化社会福利的方式分配会议时间。我们讨论了之前尝试设计激励相容(IC)和个体理性(IR)机制的问题。我们关注确定代理何时可用的问题。特别是,我们表明,当要求具有一般评估函数的代理提供其会议时间的可用性时,没有IC和IR机制。鉴于这种不可能的结果,我们展示了如何通过代理人表达他们对其他人出席会议的价值来降低违反IR的可能性。我们还展示了请求整个调度的代理首选项如何有助于消除IC问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mechanism design for multi-agent meeting scheduling including time preferences, availability, and value of presence
We examine the benefits and limitations of mechanism design as it applies to multi-agent meeting scheduling. We look at the problem of scheduling multiple meetings between various groups of agents that arise over time. Each of the agents has private information regarding their tune preferences for meetings. Our aim is to extract this information and assign the meetings to times in a way that maximises social welfare. We discuss problems with previous attempts to design incentive compatible (IC) and individually rational (IR) mechanisms for the task. We focus on the problem of determining when agents are available. In particular, we show that when agents with general valuation functions are asked to supply their availability for meeting times, there is no IC and IR mechanism. Given this impossibility result, we show how the likelihood of violating IR can be reduced through agents expressing their value for the presence of others at meetings. We also show how requesting agent preferences for entire schedules helps to eliminate IC problems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信