Annija Kārkliņa, Latvijas Universitāte, Jānis Kārkliņš
{"title":"Darbinieka atstādināšana no darba un tās tiesiskās sekas","authors":"Annija Kārkliņa, Latvijas Universitāte, Jānis Kārkliņš","doi":"10.22364/iscflul.7.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Section 58 of the Republic of Latvia Labour Law provides for the right of an employer to suspend an employee from work in certain cases. Given that employee’s suspension involves certain legal consequences, an employer has a duty to comply with precise preconditions for the legal and justifiable suspension of an employee. The law lays down preconditions, such as the presence of alcohol, drugs or toxic intoxication, and more general preconditions for the suspension of an employee, – cases when failure to suspend an employee from work may be detrimental to his or her safety or the health or safety of third parties. The law also provides for the legitimate interests of employer or third parties as a precondition for suspension. The aim of this paper work is to analyse the legal meaning of Section 58 of the Labour Law, case law and doctrine. The research is carried out in order to provide precise identification and general criteria when the suspension by an employer would be legal and when it would be considered as implemented without observing the purpose and meaning of the law. Atslēgvārdi: Darba likums, darbinieka atstādināšana, darba devēja pamatotās intereses, trešo personu pamatotās intereses, atstādināšanas kārtība, atstādināšanas rīkojums","PeriodicalId":212350,"journal":{"name":"Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Science: Functions, Significance and Future in Legal Systems I","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.7.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
《拉脱维亚共和国劳动法》第58条规定,雇主有权在某些情况下暂停雇员的工作。鉴于雇员停职涉及一定的法律后果,雇主有责任遵守对雇员进行合法和正当停职的确切前提条件。法律规定了先决条件,如存在酒精、毒品或有毒物质中毒,以及更一般的暂停雇员工作的先决条件,在不暂停雇员工作可能损害其安全或损害第三方健康或安全的情况下。法律还规定,雇主或第三方的合法利益是暂停工作的先决条件。本文的目的是分析《劳动法》第58条、判例法和理论的法律含义。进行这项研究的目的是提供准确的鉴定和一般标准,以便在什么情况下雇主的停职是合法的,以及在什么情况下停职被认为是在不遵守法律的目的和意义的情况下执行的。Atslēgvārdi: Darba likums, darbinieka atstādināšana, Darba devēja pamatotās interes, trešo personu pamatotās interes, atstādināšanas kārtība, atstādināšanas r kojums
Darbinieka atstādināšana no darba un tās tiesiskās sekas
Section 58 of the Republic of Latvia Labour Law provides for the right of an employer to suspend an employee from work in certain cases. Given that employee’s suspension involves certain legal consequences, an employer has a duty to comply with precise preconditions for the legal and justifiable suspension of an employee. The law lays down preconditions, such as the presence of alcohol, drugs or toxic intoxication, and more general preconditions for the suspension of an employee, – cases when failure to suspend an employee from work may be detrimental to his or her safety or the health or safety of third parties. The law also provides for the legitimate interests of employer or third parties as a precondition for suspension. The aim of this paper work is to analyse the legal meaning of Section 58 of the Labour Law, case law and doctrine. The research is carried out in order to provide precise identification and general criteria when the suspension by an employer would be legal and when it would be considered as implemented without observing the purpose and meaning of the law. Atslēgvārdi: Darba likums, darbinieka atstādināšana, darba devēja pamatotās intereses, trešo personu pamatotās intereses, atstādināšanas kārtība, atstādināšanas rīkojums