关于在未受保护野生草本植物的非法释放中执行不当行为的刑事审查(判例第36号/Pid)。B - Lh Pn - 2022 Tjk)

Recca Ayu Hapsari, I. Satria, Muhammad Satria Akbari
{"title":"关于在未受保护野生草本植物的非法释放中执行不当行为的刑事审查(判例第36号/Pid)。B - Lh Pn - 2022 Tjk)","authors":"Recca Ayu Hapsari, I. Satria, Muhammad Satria Akbari","doi":"10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.3171","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study was to find out the reasons why the perpetrators committed the criminal act of coercing permits for domestic distribution of wild plants that were not protected based on Decree No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/PN Tjk, Discussing legal issues . Consequences in criminal cases of enforcing permits for domestic distribution of wild plants that are not protected (Review of Decision No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/PN Tjk). The research method uses a prescriptive approach. The factors that prompted the perpetrators to commit the criminal act of implementing permits for the domestic distribution of wild plants that were not protected in Decision No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/ PN.Tjk based on factors and perpetrators did not consider it. Explaining the consequences of negligent actions, the perpetrator does not know that his actions can lead to unlawful consequences. The perpetrator's negligence in taking legal precautions means that the perpetrator did not exercise due care, intention, skill, prevention or wisdom in carrying out the act. This is the basis for perpetrators to commit crimes without issuing permits according to law. The legal consequence arising from the defendant's actions is a violation of the fourth alternative lawsuit Article 106 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Elimination of Forest Damage. The requirements for negligence in carrying out tasks based on Article 28 letter H are fulfilled in accordance with the law. The defendant's actions violated the fourth alternative charge of Article 106 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Elimination of Forest Damage. Therefore, as a result of the defendant's actions, the panel of judges sentenced the defendant to seven months' imprisonment and replaced him with a fine of Rp. one month.","PeriodicalId":131598,"journal":{"name":"JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KELALAIAN DALAM PELAKSANAAN TUGAS PADA TERBITNYA IZIN PENGEDAR DALAM NEGERI TUMBUHAN LIAR YANG TIDAK DILINDUNGI (Studi Putusan Nomor 36/Pid.B/Lh/2022/Pn Tjk)\",\"authors\":\"Recca Ayu Hapsari, I. Satria, Muhammad Satria Akbari\",\"doi\":\"10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.3171\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this study was to find out the reasons why the perpetrators committed the criminal act of coercing permits for domestic distribution of wild plants that were not protected based on Decree No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/PN Tjk, Discussing legal issues . Consequences in criminal cases of enforcing permits for domestic distribution of wild plants that are not protected (Review of Decision No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/PN Tjk). The research method uses a prescriptive approach. The factors that prompted the perpetrators to commit the criminal act of implementing permits for the domestic distribution of wild plants that were not protected in Decision No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/ PN.Tjk based on factors and perpetrators did not consider it. Explaining the consequences of negligent actions, the perpetrator does not know that his actions can lead to unlawful consequences. The perpetrator's negligence in taking legal precautions means that the perpetrator did not exercise due care, intention, skill, prevention or wisdom in carrying out the act. This is the basis for perpetrators to commit crimes without issuing permits according to law. The legal consequence arising from the defendant's actions is a violation of the fourth alternative lawsuit Article 106 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Elimination of Forest Damage. The requirements for negligence in carrying out tasks based on Article 28 letter H are fulfilled in accordance with the law. The defendant's actions violated the fourth alternative charge of Article 106 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Elimination of Forest Damage. Therefore, as a result of the defendant's actions, the panel of judges sentenced the defendant to seven months' imprisonment and replaced him with a fine of Rp. one month.\",\"PeriodicalId\":131598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana\",\"volume\":\"113 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.3171\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.3171","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究的目的是找出肇事者实施胁迫许可不受第36/Pid号法令保护的野生植物在国内分布的犯罪行为的原因。B/LH/2022/PN Tjk,讨论法律问题。对不受保护的野生植物在国内传播实施许可证的刑事案件的后果(审查第36/Pid号决定)。B / LH / 2022 / PN Tjk)。研究方法采用规定性方法。促使肇事者实施实施第36/Pid号决定未保护的野生植物国内分销许可证的犯罪行为的因素。B / LH / 2022 / PN。Tjk基于因素和作恶者没有考虑。在解释过失行为的后果时,行为人并不知道他的行为会导致非法后果。行为人未采取法律预防措施,是指行为人在实施该行为时未行使应有的注意、意图、技巧、预防或者智慧。这是不法分子不依法发放许可而实施犯罪的依据。被告的行为所产生的法律后果违反了印度尼西亚共和国2013年第18号关于防止和消除森林损害的法律第106条的第四项替代诉讼。依法满足第二十八条(H)项规定的过失执行任务的条件。被告的行为违反了印度尼西亚共和国2013年第18号关于防止和消除森林损害的法律第106条的第四项替代指控。因此,由于被告的行为,法官合议庭判处被告入狱七个月,并代之以港币罚款。一个月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KELALAIAN DALAM PELAKSANAAN TUGAS PADA TERBITNYA IZIN PENGEDAR DALAM NEGERI TUMBUHAN LIAR YANG TIDAK DILINDUNGI (Studi Putusan Nomor 36/Pid.B/Lh/2022/Pn Tjk)
The purpose of this study was to find out the reasons why the perpetrators committed the criminal act of coercing permits for domestic distribution of wild plants that were not protected based on Decree No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/PN Tjk, Discussing legal issues . Consequences in criminal cases of enforcing permits for domestic distribution of wild plants that are not protected (Review of Decision No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/PN Tjk). The research method uses a prescriptive approach. The factors that prompted the perpetrators to commit the criminal act of implementing permits for the domestic distribution of wild plants that were not protected in Decision No. 36/Pid.B/LH/2022/ PN.Tjk based on factors and perpetrators did not consider it. Explaining the consequences of negligent actions, the perpetrator does not know that his actions can lead to unlawful consequences. The perpetrator's negligence in taking legal precautions means that the perpetrator did not exercise due care, intention, skill, prevention or wisdom in carrying out the act. This is the basis for perpetrators to commit crimes without issuing permits according to law. The legal consequence arising from the defendant's actions is a violation of the fourth alternative lawsuit Article 106 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Elimination of Forest Damage. The requirements for negligence in carrying out tasks based on Article 28 letter H are fulfilled in accordance with the law. The defendant's actions violated the fourth alternative charge of Article 106 of the Law of the Republic of Indonesia No. 18 of 2013 concerning Prevention and Elimination of Forest Damage. Therefore, as a result of the defendant's actions, the panel of judges sentenced the defendant to seven months' imprisonment and replaced him with a fine of Rp. one month.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信