评估卫生系统反应:一项定性研究

Soleyman Saravani, Ali Kebriaie, I. Roshdi
{"title":"评估卫生系统反应:一项定性研究","authors":"Soleyman Saravani, Ali Kebriaie, I. Roshdi","doi":"10.52547/payesh.21.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"46 Abstract Objective (s): Responsiveness is considered as a strategic tool through which organizational performance is evaluated, customer satisfaction is promoted, and operational efficiency and improvement of business operations are achieved. Since the study of the dimensions of accountability of any organization requires the determination of specific indicators for that organization, recognizing the indicators and determining the degree of reliability becomes an important issue. Methods : This qualitative study was conducted in 1399 with content analysis method. Participants were purposefully selected. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview. After conducting 30 interviews with managers, experts and experts, the data were saturated. And was analyzed using Granheim-llandman's qualitative content analysis method. Results : By reviewing and analyzing the interviews, 6 main themes and 84 sub-themes were extracted. The main themes include designing an appropriate structure for accountability, considering trustees for accountability of the health system, defined and independent management for accountability, predicting units outside the health system for accountability, designing an appropriate model for customer-centered accountability, use indicators and checklists to assess the accountability of the health system. Conclusion: This study identified six strategies for evaluating health system accountability to be suggested to managers and policymakers, and to consider these strategies when planning to evaluate health system","PeriodicalId":235399,"journal":{"name":"Health Monitor Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the health system responsiveness: A qualitative study\",\"authors\":\"Soleyman Saravani, Ali Kebriaie, I. Roshdi\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/payesh.21.1.35\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"46 Abstract Objective (s): Responsiveness is considered as a strategic tool through which organizational performance is evaluated, customer satisfaction is promoted, and operational efficiency and improvement of business operations are achieved. Since the study of the dimensions of accountability of any organization requires the determination of specific indicators for that organization, recognizing the indicators and determining the degree of reliability becomes an important issue. Methods : This qualitative study was conducted in 1399 with content analysis method. Participants were purposefully selected. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview. After conducting 30 interviews with managers, experts and experts, the data were saturated. And was analyzed using Granheim-llandman's qualitative content analysis method. Results : By reviewing and analyzing the interviews, 6 main themes and 84 sub-themes were extracted. The main themes include designing an appropriate structure for accountability, considering trustees for accountability of the health system, defined and independent management for accountability, predicting units outside the health system for accountability, designing an appropriate model for customer-centered accountability, use indicators and checklists to assess the accountability of the health system. Conclusion: This study identified six strategies for evaluating health system accountability to be suggested to managers and policymakers, and to consider these strategies when planning to evaluate health system\",\"PeriodicalId\":235399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Monitor Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Monitor Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/payesh.21.1.35\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Monitor Journal of the Iranian Institute for Health Sciences Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/payesh.21.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目标:响应性被认为是一种战略工具,通过它可以评估组织绩效,提高客户满意度,实现运营效率和业务运营的改进。由于研究任何组织的责任维度都需要确定该组织的具体指标,因此认识这些指标并确定可靠性程度就成为一个重要问题。方法:采用含量分析法对1399年进行定性研究。参与者是有目的地选择的。数据收集工具为半结构化访谈。在对管理者、专家、专家进行了30次访谈后,数据趋于饱和。并采用Granheim-llandman定性含量分析法进行分析。结果:通过对访谈的回顾分析,提炼出6个主旋律和84个副旋律。主要主题包括设计适当的问责结构,考虑卫生系统的受托人问责,明确和独立的问责管理,预测卫生系统外的单位问责,设计以客户为中心的问责的适当模式,使用指标和清单来评估卫生系统的问责。结论:本研究确定了六种评估卫生系统问责制的策略,建议管理者和决策者在计划评估卫生系统时考虑这些策略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the health system responsiveness: A qualitative study
46 Abstract Objective (s): Responsiveness is considered as a strategic tool through which organizational performance is evaluated, customer satisfaction is promoted, and operational efficiency and improvement of business operations are achieved. Since the study of the dimensions of accountability of any organization requires the determination of specific indicators for that organization, recognizing the indicators and determining the degree of reliability becomes an important issue. Methods : This qualitative study was conducted in 1399 with content analysis method. Participants were purposefully selected. The data collection tool was a semi-structured interview. After conducting 30 interviews with managers, experts and experts, the data were saturated. And was analyzed using Granheim-llandman's qualitative content analysis method. Results : By reviewing and analyzing the interviews, 6 main themes and 84 sub-themes were extracted. The main themes include designing an appropriate structure for accountability, considering trustees for accountability of the health system, defined and independent management for accountability, predicting units outside the health system for accountability, designing an appropriate model for customer-centered accountability, use indicators and checklists to assess the accountability of the health system. Conclusion: This study identified six strategies for evaluating health system accountability to be suggested to managers and policymakers, and to consider these strategies when planning to evaluate health system
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信