实验在需求规范的可理解性中的实际相关性

Nelly Condori-Fernández, M. Daneva, K. Sikkel, A. Herrmann
{"title":"实验在需求规范的可理解性中的实际相关性","authors":"Nelly Condori-Fernández, M. Daneva, K. Sikkel, A. Herrmann","doi":"10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recently, the Requirements Engineering (RE) community has become increasingly aware of the importance of carrying out industry-relevant research. Researchers and practitioners should be able to evaluate the relevance of their empirical research to increase the likely adoption of RE methods in software industry. It is in this perspective that we evaluate 24 experimental studies on comprehensibility of software requirements specifications to determine their practical value. To that end a checklist based on Kitchenham's approach was operationalized from a practitioner's perspective and an analysis with respect to the main factors that affecting on comprehensibility was carried out. Although 100% of the papers reviewed reported statistically significant results, and 96% of them take examples from a real-life project. 80% of the papers do not scale to real life, 54% of the papers do not specify the context in which the results are expected to be useful. We also found that there is a lack of underlying theory in the formulation of comprehensibility questions.","PeriodicalId":128168,"journal":{"name":"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical relevance of experiments in comprehensibility of requirements specifications\",\"authors\":\"Nelly Condori-Fernández, M. Daneva, K. Sikkel, A. Herrmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046251\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recently, the Requirements Engineering (RE) community has become increasingly aware of the importance of carrying out industry-relevant research. Researchers and practitioners should be able to evaluate the relevance of their empirical research to increase the likely adoption of RE methods in software industry. It is in this perspective that we evaluate 24 experimental studies on comprehensibility of software requirements specifications to determine their practical value. To that end a checklist based on Kitchenham's approach was operationalized from a practitioner's perspective and an analysis with respect to the main factors that affecting on comprehensibility was carried out. Although 100% of the papers reviewed reported statistically significant results, and 96% of them take examples from a real-life project. 80% of the papers do not scale to real life, 54% of the papers do not specify the context in which the results are expected to be useful. We also found that there is a lack of underlying theory in the formulation of comprehensibility questions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":128168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046251\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Workshop on Empirical Requirements Engineering (EmpiRE 2011)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EmpiRE.2011.6046251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

最近,需求工程(RE)社区越来越意识到开展与行业相关的研究的重要性。研究人员和实践者应该能够评估他们的实证研究的相关性,以增加软件行业采用可再生能源方法的可能性。正是从这个角度出发,我们评估了24项关于软件需求说明的可理解性的实验研究,以确定它们的实用价值。为此,从实践者的角度出发,建立了一份基于Kitchenham方法的清单,并对影响可理解性的主要因素进行了分析。尽管100%的论文报告了统计上显著的结果,其中96%的论文从现实生活中的项目中举例。80%的论文没有在现实生活中进行缩放,54%的论文没有具体说明研究结果有望在哪些环境中发挥作用。我们还发现,在可理解性问题的制定中缺乏基础理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical relevance of experiments in comprehensibility of requirements specifications
Recently, the Requirements Engineering (RE) community has become increasingly aware of the importance of carrying out industry-relevant research. Researchers and practitioners should be able to evaluate the relevance of their empirical research to increase the likely adoption of RE methods in software industry. It is in this perspective that we evaluate 24 experimental studies on comprehensibility of software requirements specifications to determine their practical value. To that end a checklist based on Kitchenham's approach was operationalized from a practitioner's perspective and an analysis with respect to the main factors that affecting on comprehensibility was carried out. Although 100% of the papers reviewed reported statistically significant results, and 96% of them take examples from a real-life project. 80% of the papers do not scale to real life, 54% of the papers do not specify the context in which the results are expected to be useful. We also found that there is a lack of underlying theory in the formulation of comprehensibility questions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信