Volve油田F-12井储量估算不同方法的比较研究

M. J.
{"title":"Volve油田F-12井储量估算不同方法的比较研究","authors":"M. J.","doi":"10.23880/jenr-16000312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present paper deliberates a comparison study between volumetric and material balance methods used in the estimation of reserves in well F-12 of Volve field. Based on PVT and petrophysical data, the estimation of reserves is done by using volumetric method with Excel software. The material balance method is applied on the PVT data, tank data and production history data to provide estimation by using MBAL software. The volumetric method gives estimated oil in place of about 67,639,727.94 Sm3 and so the reserve is equal to 36,525,453.09 S m3. While the stock tank original oil in place (STOIP) generated from MBAL software is 19,607,700 Sm3 and so the reserve is estimated to 10,584,378 Sm3. The volumetric method is less accurate than material balance method because it is based on the assumption that the reservoir is static and homogeneous. This is the reason why volumetric method provides an overestimated reserve. So, the material balance method seems to be the best method because of the amount and the type of production data used.","PeriodicalId":186239,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Study between Different Methods Used in the Estimation of Reserves in well F-12 of Volve Field\",\"authors\":\"M. J.\",\"doi\":\"10.23880/jenr-16000312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present paper deliberates a comparison study between volumetric and material balance methods used in the estimation of reserves in well F-12 of Volve field. Based on PVT and petrophysical data, the estimation of reserves is done by using volumetric method with Excel software. The material balance method is applied on the PVT data, tank data and production history data to provide estimation by using MBAL software. The volumetric method gives estimated oil in place of about 67,639,727.94 Sm3 and so the reserve is equal to 36,525,453.09 S m3. While the stock tank original oil in place (STOIP) generated from MBAL software is 19,607,700 Sm3 and so the reserve is estimated to 10,584,378 Sm3. The volumetric method is less accurate than material balance method because it is based on the assumption that the reservoir is static and homogeneous. This is the reason why volumetric method provides an overestimated reserve. So, the material balance method seems to be the best method because of the amount and the type of production data used.\",\"PeriodicalId\":186239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23880/jenr-16000312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ecology & Natural Resources","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23880/jenr-16000312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文对Volve油田F-12井储量估算中采用的体积法和物质平衡法进行了对比研究。根据PVT和岩石物理资料,采用体积法,利用Excel软件进行储量估算。利用MBAL软件对PVT数据、油罐数据和生产历史数据应用物料衡算法进行估算。容积法给出的储量估计约为67,639,727.94立方米,因此储量等于36,525,453.09立方米。而由MBAL软件生成的储罐原始油(STOIP)为19,607,700立方米,因此储量估计为10,584,378立方米。体积法不如物质平衡法准确,因为它是基于储层是静态和均匀的假设。这就是容积法提供了一个高估储量的原因。因此,由于所使用的生产数据的数量和类型,物料衡算法似乎是最好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Study between Different Methods Used in the Estimation of Reserves in well F-12 of Volve Field
The present paper deliberates a comparison study between volumetric and material balance methods used in the estimation of reserves in well F-12 of Volve field. Based on PVT and petrophysical data, the estimation of reserves is done by using volumetric method with Excel software. The material balance method is applied on the PVT data, tank data and production history data to provide estimation by using MBAL software. The volumetric method gives estimated oil in place of about 67,639,727.94 Sm3 and so the reserve is equal to 36,525,453.09 S m3. While the stock tank original oil in place (STOIP) generated from MBAL software is 19,607,700 Sm3 and so the reserve is estimated to 10,584,378 Sm3. The volumetric method is less accurate than material balance method because it is based on the assumption that the reservoir is static and homogeneous. This is the reason why volumetric method provides an overestimated reserve. So, the material balance method seems to be the best method because of the amount and the type of production data used.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信