舆论与法律:在大众媒体的FACEBOOK账户上分析网民对伊斯兰教违反工会新闻的主题反应

Ainal Fitri, M. Haekal
{"title":"舆论与法律:在大众媒体的FACEBOOK账户上分析网民对伊斯兰教违反工会新闻的主题反应","authors":"Ainal Fitri, M. Haekal","doi":"10.35308/SOURCE.V7I1.3285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative descriptive research studied the public narratives regarding the caning execution news on Serambinews.com's Facebook fan page. Apart from that, this research also investigated the relationship between Facebook users' discussion against public policy (Sharia law) and the existence of Serambinews.com as the news media. This research used the five most commented news links from January 2018 to December 2020 as the data. This data was analyzed using Thematic Analysis and studied using the concept of Public Opinion. The results showed that the public often discussed four dominant themes, including two topics that exhibited negative nuances, such as proposing extreme punishment and defamation against the convicts. These themes were a reflection of the growing public opinion regarding the caning in Aceh. Negative public opinion had the potential to form a consensus and affected public policy regarding Sharia law. But on the other hand, despite the domination of negative public opinion, the researcher argued that Serambinews.com gained economic benefits from this practice.","PeriodicalId":148767,"journal":{"name":"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HUKUM CAMBUK & OPINI PUBLIK: ANALISIS TEMATIK TANGGAPAN NETIZEN TERHADAP BERITA PELANGGARAN SYARIAT ISLAM DI AKUN FACEBOOK MEDIA MASSA\",\"authors\":\"Ainal Fitri, M. Haekal\",\"doi\":\"10.35308/SOURCE.V7I1.3285\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This qualitative descriptive research studied the public narratives regarding the caning execution news on Serambinews.com's Facebook fan page. Apart from that, this research also investigated the relationship between Facebook users' discussion against public policy (Sharia law) and the existence of Serambinews.com as the news media. This research used the five most commented news links from January 2018 to December 2020 as the data. This data was analyzed using Thematic Analysis and studied using the concept of Public Opinion. The results showed that the public often discussed four dominant themes, including two topics that exhibited negative nuances, such as proposing extreme punishment and defamation against the convicts. These themes were a reflection of the growing public opinion regarding the caning in Aceh. Negative public opinion had the potential to form a consensus and affected public policy regarding Sharia law. But on the other hand, despite the domination of negative public opinion, the researcher argued that Serambinews.com gained economic benefits from this practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":148767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35308/SOURCE.V7I1.3285\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SOURCE : Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35308/SOURCE.V7I1.3285","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

这项定性描述性研究研究了Serambinews.com Facebook粉丝页面上关于鞭刑执行新闻的公众叙述。除此之外,本研究还调查了Facebook用户对公共政策(伊斯兰教法)的讨论与Serambinews.com作为新闻媒体的存在之间的关系。本研究使用2018年1月至2020年12月评论最多的五个新闻链接作为数据。这些数据使用专题分析进行分析,并使用民意概念进行研究。结果显示,公众经常讨论四个主要主题,其中两个主题表现出负面的细微差别,如建议极端惩罚和对罪犯的诽谤。这些主题反映了亚齐对鞭刑日益增长的公众舆论。负面的公众舆论有可能形成共识,并影响有关伊斯兰教法的公共政策。但另一方面,尽管负面舆论占主导地位,研究人员认为,Serambinews.com从这种做法中获得了经济利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HUKUM CAMBUK & OPINI PUBLIK: ANALISIS TEMATIK TANGGAPAN NETIZEN TERHADAP BERITA PELANGGARAN SYARIAT ISLAM DI AKUN FACEBOOK MEDIA MASSA
This qualitative descriptive research studied the public narratives regarding the caning execution news on Serambinews.com's Facebook fan page. Apart from that, this research also investigated the relationship between Facebook users' discussion against public policy (Sharia law) and the existence of Serambinews.com as the news media. This research used the five most commented news links from January 2018 to December 2020 as the data. This data was analyzed using Thematic Analysis and studied using the concept of Public Opinion. The results showed that the public often discussed four dominant themes, including two topics that exhibited negative nuances, such as proposing extreme punishment and defamation against the convicts. These themes were a reflection of the growing public opinion regarding the caning in Aceh. Negative public opinion had the potential to form a consensus and affected public policy regarding Sharia law. But on the other hand, despite the domination of negative public opinion, the researcher argued that Serambinews.com gained economic benefits from this practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信