A. Fitrani, Nikko Enggaliano Pratama, A. B. Raharjo, Yudhi Purwananto, D. Purwitasari
{"title":"基于机器学习的选举投票公众参与率预测模型比较研究","authors":"A. Fitrani, Nikko Enggaliano Pratama, A. B. Raharjo, Yudhi Purwananto, D. Purwitasari","doi":"10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prediction of public participation in elections is one measure of election success. Voter participation is at the polling station level and involves four data sources: voters, polling stations, recapitulation, and village profiles. The preprocessing stage is carried out on each dataset, including maintenance, transformation, and integration. Two types of datasets are defined, involving all attributes and removing the result from attribute correlation. Classification method with five machine learning algorithms (ML) with participation prediction classes labelled High and Low. The highest result is 85.90% for the type 1 dataset and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm with 60% training and 40% testing split dataset. Furthermore, for detachment type 2, by eliminating several attributes, 100% results are obtained for the K-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm with a split dataset of 70% training and 30% testing. Of the five ML algorithms, only the Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithm did not experience an increase in prediction results. Furthermore, the significant influence of attributes on the prediction class is shown in each attribute of the dataset, including the Permanent Voter List at the Polling Place (DPT TPS), Local, Health Access and Total Recapitulation.","PeriodicalId":382763,"journal":{"name":"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Machine Learning based Prediction Models for Public Participation Rate in an Election Voting\",\"authors\":\"A. Fitrani, Nikko Enggaliano Pratama, A. B. Raharjo, Yudhi Purwananto, D. Purwitasari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prediction of public participation in elections is one measure of election success. Voter participation is at the polling station level and involves four data sources: voters, polling stations, recapitulation, and village profiles. The preprocessing stage is carried out on each dataset, including maintenance, transformation, and integration. Two types of datasets are defined, involving all attributes and removing the result from attribute correlation. Classification method with five machine learning algorithms (ML) with participation prediction classes labelled High and Low. The highest result is 85.90% for the type 1 dataset and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm with 60% training and 40% testing split dataset. Furthermore, for detachment type 2, by eliminating several attributes, 100% results are obtained for the K-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm with a split dataset of 70% training and 30% testing. Of the five ML algorithms, only the Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithm did not experience an increase in prediction results. Furthermore, the significant influence of attributes on the prediction class is shown in each attribute of the dataset, including the Permanent Voter List at the Polling Place (DPT TPS), Local, Health Access and Total Recapitulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Comparative Study on Machine Learning based Prediction Models for Public Participation Rate in an Election Voting
Prediction of public participation in elections is one measure of election success. Voter participation is at the polling station level and involves four data sources: voters, polling stations, recapitulation, and village profiles. The preprocessing stage is carried out on each dataset, including maintenance, transformation, and integration. Two types of datasets are defined, involving all attributes and removing the result from attribute correlation. Classification method with five machine learning algorithms (ML) with participation prediction classes labelled High and Low. The highest result is 85.90% for the type 1 dataset and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm with 60% training and 40% testing split dataset. Furthermore, for detachment type 2, by eliminating several attributes, 100% results are obtained for the K-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm with a split dataset of 70% training and 30% testing. Of the five ML algorithms, only the Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithm did not experience an increase in prediction results. Furthermore, the significant influence of attributes on the prediction class is shown in each attribute of the dataset, including the Permanent Voter List at the Polling Place (DPT TPS), Local, Health Access and Total Recapitulation.