基于机器学习的选举投票公众参与率预测模型比较研究

A. Fitrani, Nikko Enggaliano Pratama, A. B. Raharjo, Yudhi Purwananto, D. Purwitasari
{"title":"基于机器学习的选举投票公众参与率预测模型比较研究","authors":"A. Fitrani, Nikko Enggaliano Pratama, A. B. Raharjo, Yudhi Purwananto, D. Purwitasari","doi":"10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prediction of public participation in elections is one measure of election success. Voter participation is at the polling station level and involves four data sources: voters, polling stations, recapitulation, and village profiles. The preprocessing stage is carried out on each dataset, including maintenance, transformation, and integration. Two types of datasets are defined, involving all attributes and removing the result from attribute correlation. Classification method with five machine learning algorithms (ML) with participation prediction classes labelled High and Low. The highest result is 85.90% for the type 1 dataset and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm with 60% training and 40% testing split dataset. Furthermore, for detachment type 2, by eliminating several attributes, 100% results are obtained for the K-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm with a split dataset of 70% training and 30% testing. Of the five ML algorithms, only the Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithm did not experience an increase in prediction results. Furthermore, the significant influence of attributes on the prediction class is shown in each attribute of the dataset, including the Permanent Voter List at the Polling Place (DPT TPS), Local, Health Access and Total Recapitulation.","PeriodicalId":382763,"journal":{"name":"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Study on Machine Learning based Prediction Models for Public Participation Rate in an Election Voting\",\"authors\":\"A. Fitrani, Nikko Enggaliano Pratama, A. B. Raharjo, Yudhi Purwananto, D. Purwitasari\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Prediction of public participation in elections is one measure of election success. Voter participation is at the polling station level and involves four data sources: voters, polling stations, recapitulation, and village profiles. The preprocessing stage is carried out on each dataset, including maintenance, transformation, and integration. Two types of datasets are defined, involving all attributes and removing the result from attribute correlation. Classification method with five machine learning algorithms (ML) with participation prediction classes labelled High and Low. The highest result is 85.90% for the type 1 dataset and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm with 60% training and 40% testing split dataset. Furthermore, for detachment type 2, by eliminating several attributes, 100% results are obtained for the K-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm with a split dataset of 70% training and 30% testing. Of the five ML algorithms, only the Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithm did not experience an increase in prediction results. Furthermore, the significant influence of attributes on the prediction class is shown in each attribute of the dataset, including the Permanent Voter List at the Polling Place (DPT TPS), Local, Health Access and Total Recapitulation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)\",\"volume\":\"109 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 3rd International Conference on Electrical Engineering and Informatics (ICon EEI)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IConEEI55709.2022.9972283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预测公众参与选举是衡量选举成功的一个标准。选民参与是在投票站层面进行的,涉及四个数据源:选民、投票站、重述和村庄概况。对每个数据集进行预处理,包括维护、转换和集成。定义了两种类型的数据集,涉及所有属性并从属性相关性中去除结果。五种机器学习算法(ML)的分类方法,参与预测类别标记为高和低。对于类型1数据集和人工神经网络(ANN)算法,其中60%的训练和40%的测试分割数据集,最高结果为85.90%。此外,对于分离类型2,通过消除几个属性,使用70%训练和30%测试的分割数据集,k -最近邻(kNN)算法获得100%的结果。在五种机器学习算法中,只有Naïve贝叶斯(NB)算法的预测结果没有增加。此外,数据集的每个属性都显示了属性对预测类别的显著影响,包括投票站的永久选民名单(DPT TPS)、本地、健康访问和总重述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Comparative Study on Machine Learning based Prediction Models for Public Participation Rate in an Election Voting
Prediction of public participation in elections is one measure of election success. Voter participation is at the polling station level and involves four data sources: voters, polling stations, recapitulation, and village profiles. The preprocessing stage is carried out on each dataset, including maintenance, transformation, and integration. Two types of datasets are defined, involving all attributes and removing the result from attribute correlation. Classification method with five machine learning algorithms (ML) with participation prediction classes labelled High and Low. The highest result is 85.90% for the type 1 dataset and Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithm with 60% training and 40% testing split dataset. Furthermore, for detachment type 2, by eliminating several attributes, 100% results are obtained for the K-Nearest Neighbor (kNN) algorithm with a split dataset of 70% training and 30% testing. Of the five ML algorithms, only the Naïve Bayes (NB) algorithm did not experience an increase in prediction results. Furthermore, the significant influence of attributes on the prediction class is shown in each attribute of the dataset, including the Permanent Voter List at the Polling Place (DPT TPS), Local, Health Access and Total Recapitulation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信