不同学科对研究影响的经验和看法不同吗?

The Impact Agenda Pub Date : 2020-05-01 DOI:10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.10

Katherine E. Smith, J. Bandola-Gill, N. Meer, E. Stewart, R. Watermeyer

{"title":"不同学科对研究影响的经验和看法不同吗?","authors":"Katherine E. Smith, J. Bandola-Gill, N. Meer, E. Stewart, R. Watermeyer","doi":"10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter widens the focus of the book to explore whether there appear to be any disciplinary patterns amongst perspectives on, and experiences of, research impact in UK academia. This chapter includes an analysis of whether published perspectives on the impact agenda appear to vary by discipline (as predicted by Nowotny et al, 2001), informed by new focus group and interview data conducted for this book.","PeriodicalId":378348,"journal":{"name":"The Impact Agenda","volume":"224 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do experiences and perceptions of research impact vary by discipline?\",\"authors\":\"Katherine E. Smith, J. Bandola-Gill, N. Meer, E. Stewart, R. Watermeyer\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter widens the focus of the book to explore whether there appear to be any disciplinary patterns amongst perspectives on, and experiences of, research impact in UK academia. This chapter includes an analysis of whether published perspectives on the impact agenda appear to vary by discipline (as predicted by Nowotny et al, 2001), informed by new focus group and interview data conducted for this book.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Impact Agenda\",\"volume\":\"224 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Impact Agenda\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Impact Agenda","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11g95dd.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本章扩大了本书的焦点，以探讨在英国学术界的研究影响的观点和经验中是否存在任何学科模式。本章包括对发表的关于影响议程的观点是否因学科而异的分析(正如诺沃特尼等人2001年所预测的那样)，并根据为本书进行的新的焦点小组和访谈数据提供信息。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Do experiences and perceptions of research impact vary by discipline?

This chapter widens the focus of the book to explore whether there appear to be any disciplinary patterns amongst perspectives on, and experiences of, research impact in UK academia. This chapter includes an analysis of whether published perspectives on the impact agenda appear to vary by discipline (as predicted by Nowotny et al, 2001), informed by new focus group and interview data conducted for this book.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The Impact Agenda

自引率

0.00%

发文量