联合国欧洲经委会水公约:与1997年国际淡水使用公约兼容的文书?比较分析

A. Fillol
{"title":"联合国欧洲经委会水公约:与1997年国际淡水使用公约兼容的文书?比较分析","authors":"A. Fillol","doi":"10.31672/54.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present work is a practical and applied comparative study of a generic aspect highlighted both in the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in its text, this is cooperation for development among States and the right to a living condition with human dignity. In this regard, the management of international fresh water and environmental sustainability becomes an aspect of great importance, that will have an increasing incidence in future years. In this understanding, the main aspects of the two main international conventions, the 1992 Water Convention and the 1997 Convention that regulate both the uses of international watercourses for purposes other than navigation, are analyzedhere. To the extent of this coincidence, it seems necessary to specify the differences between them, especially when both are in force and open to the ratification or accession of more States. We will take as a basis the Water Convention (which was the last of the two to be internationalized and contains more detailed rules) and we will analyze its main provisions, observing the extent to which they diverge or are compatible with the provisions of the Convention of 1997, to conclude on this aspect and its consequences.","PeriodicalId":440704,"journal":{"name":"Revista de Derecho Público","volume":"33 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EL CONVENIO DEL AGUA DE LA UNECE: ¿UN INSTRUMENTO COMPATIBLE CON LA CONVENCIÓN DE 1997 PARA REGULAR LOS USOS DEL AGUA DULCE INTERNACIONAL? UN ANÁLISIS COMPARADO\",\"authors\":\"A. Fillol\",\"doi\":\"10.31672/54.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present work is a practical and applied comparative study of a generic aspect highlighted both in the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in its text, this is cooperation for development among States and the right to a living condition with human dignity. In this regard, the management of international fresh water and environmental sustainability becomes an aspect of great importance, that will have an increasing incidence in future years. In this understanding, the main aspects of the two main international conventions, the 1992 Water Convention and the 1997 Convention that regulate both the uses of international watercourses for purposes other than navigation, are analyzedhere. To the extent of this coincidence, it seems necessary to specify the differences between them, especially when both are in force and open to the ratification or accession of more States. We will take as a basis the Water Convention (which was the last of the two to be internationalized and contains more detailed rules) and we will analyze its main provisions, observing the extent to which they diverge or are compatible with the provisions of the Convention of 1997, to conclude on this aspect and its consequences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":440704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista de Derecho Público\",\"volume\":\"33 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista de Derecho Público\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31672/54.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de Derecho Público","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31672/54.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本工作是对《世界人权宣言》序言及其案文中强调的一个一般方面的实际和应用比较研究,即国家间合作促进发展和享有有人类尊严的生活条件的权利。在这方面,国际淡水的管理和环境的可持续性成为一个非常重要的方面,在今后几年将越来越多地出现。在这种理解下,本文分析了两项主要国际公约的主要方面,即1992年《水权公约》和1997年《水权公约》,这两项公约都规定了国际水道的非航行用途。在这种巧合的程度上,似乎有必要具体说明它们之间的差异,特别是当两者都有效并开放给更多国家批准或加入时。我们将以水公约为基础(这是两个公约中最后一个国际化的,包含更详细的规则),我们将分析其主要条款,观察它们与1997年公约条款的分歧或兼容程度,以得出这方面的结论及其后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
EL CONVENIO DEL AGUA DE LA UNECE: ¿UN INSTRUMENTO COMPATIBLE CON LA CONVENCIÓN DE 1997 PARA REGULAR LOS USOS DEL AGUA DULCE INTERNACIONAL? UN ANÁLISIS COMPARADO
The present work is a practical and applied comparative study of a generic aspect highlighted both in the preamble of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, and in its text, this is cooperation for development among States and the right to a living condition with human dignity. In this regard, the management of international fresh water and environmental sustainability becomes an aspect of great importance, that will have an increasing incidence in future years. In this understanding, the main aspects of the two main international conventions, the 1992 Water Convention and the 1997 Convention that regulate both the uses of international watercourses for purposes other than navigation, are analyzedhere. To the extent of this coincidence, it seems necessary to specify the differences between them, especially when both are in force and open to the ratification or accession of more States. We will take as a basis the Water Convention (which was the last of the two to be internationalized and contains more detailed rules) and we will analyze its main provisions, observing the extent to which they diverge or are compatible with the provisions of the Convention of 1997, to conclude on this aspect and its consequences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信