细胞电生理变异性对离体组织内传导速度和整个心房模型去极化和复极化的影响

J. Elliott, M. Belen, L. Mainardi, V. Corino, J. F. R. Matas
{"title":"细胞电生理变异性对离体组织内传导速度和整个心房模型去极化和复极化的影响","authors":"J. Elliott, M. Belen, L. Mainardi, V. Corino, J. F. R. Matas","doi":"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Improved understanding of the impact of variability on electrophysiological mechanisms is key to understanding the cause and development of cardiovascular disease. Recent studies suggest cellular variability could have an impact on electrophysiological behavior that homogeneous models are unable to capture. This study investigates the impact of cellular variability on conduction velocity and the depolarization and repolarization phases of the atria. Method: 10 Isolated tissue samples for each atrial region were calibrated for CV and later combined in a detailed anatomical atrial model. Variable models were compared with equivalent homogeneous models. Activation maps and APD maps were used for comparison. Results: In isolated tissue simulations, differences in tissue conductance (Gi) ranged between 5.5% reduction to 5.4% increase as a result of heterogeneity, despite differences in CV being <1%. Activation maps showed no significant differences between regionally homogeneous and heterogeneous atrial models. Repolarization across the atria differed significantly between regionally homogeneous and heterogeneous atrial models. Conclusion: Cellular variability has no significant impact on depolarization but significantly influences atrial repolarization. This could result in increased susceptibility to re-entries and atrial fibrillation.","PeriodicalId":126746,"journal":{"name":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of Cellular Electrophysiological Variability on Conduction Velocity Within Isolated Tissue and Depolarization and Repolarization Across the Whole Atrial Model\",\"authors\":\"J. Elliott, M. Belen, L. Mainardi, V. Corino, J. F. R. Matas\",\"doi\":\"10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Improved understanding of the impact of variability on electrophysiological mechanisms is key to understanding the cause and development of cardiovascular disease. Recent studies suggest cellular variability could have an impact on electrophysiological behavior that homogeneous models are unable to capture. This study investigates the impact of cellular variability on conduction velocity and the depolarization and repolarization phases of the atria. Method: 10 Isolated tissue samples for each atrial region were calibrated for CV and later combined in a detailed anatomical atrial model. Variable models were compared with equivalent homogeneous models. Activation maps and APD maps were used for comparison. Results: In isolated tissue simulations, differences in tissue conductance (Gi) ranged between 5.5% reduction to 5.4% increase as a result of heterogeneity, despite differences in CV being <1%. Activation maps showed no significant differences between regionally homogeneous and heterogeneous atrial models. Repolarization across the atria differed significantly between regionally homogeneous and heterogeneous atrial models. Conclusion: Cellular variability has no significant impact on depolarization but significantly influences atrial repolarization. This could result in increased susceptibility to re-entries and atrial fibrillation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":126746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662770\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Computing in Cardiology (CinC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/cinc53138.2021.9662770","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提高对电生理机制变异性影响的理解是理解心血管疾病病因和发展的关键。最近的研究表明,细胞变异性可能对电生理行为产生影响,这是同质模型无法捕捉到的。本研究探讨细胞变异性对心房传导速度及去极化和复极化相的影响。方法:对每个心房区域的10个分离组织样本进行CV校准,然后将其组合成详细的解剖心房模型。将变量模型与等效齐次模型进行比较。用激活图和APD图进行比较。结果:在孤立组织模拟中,尽管CV的差异<1%,但由于异质性,组织电导(Gi)的差异在5.5%到5.4%之间。激活图显示区域同质和异质心房模型之间无显著差异。在区域均匀型和非均匀型心房模型中,心房复极有显著差异。结论:细胞变异性对心房去极化无显著影响,但对心房复极化有显著影响。这可能导致再入和房颤的易感性增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of Cellular Electrophysiological Variability on Conduction Velocity Within Isolated Tissue and Depolarization and Repolarization Across the Whole Atrial Model
Improved understanding of the impact of variability on electrophysiological mechanisms is key to understanding the cause and development of cardiovascular disease. Recent studies suggest cellular variability could have an impact on electrophysiological behavior that homogeneous models are unable to capture. This study investigates the impact of cellular variability on conduction velocity and the depolarization and repolarization phases of the atria. Method: 10 Isolated tissue samples for each atrial region were calibrated for CV and later combined in a detailed anatomical atrial model. Variable models were compared with equivalent homogeneous models. Activation maps and APD maps were used for comparison. Results: In isolated tissue simulations, differences in tissue conductance (Gi) ranged between 5.5% reduction to 5.4% increase as a result of heterogeneity, despite differences in CV being <1%. Activation maps showed no significant differences between regionally homogeneous and heterogeneous atrial models. Repolarization across the atria differed significantly between regionally homogeneous and heterogeneous atrial models. Conclusion: Cellular variability has no significant impact on depolarization but significantly influences atrial repolarization. This could result in increased susceptibility to re-entries and atrial fibrillation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信