A. Vaskinn, Oslo universitetssykehus Hf orsk senter for forskning p lidelser, K. Muri, Universitetet i Oslo Institutt for klinisk medisin, Norges miljø og biovitenskapelige universitet Veterinærhø Institutt for produksjonsdyrmedisin
{"title":"Mennesker som utøver seksuelle handlinger med dyr","authors":"A. Vaskinn, Oslo universitetssykehus Hf orsk senter for forskning p lidelser, K. Muri, Universitetet i Oslo Institutt for klinisk medisin, Norges miljø og biovitenskapelige universitet Veterinærhø Institutt for produksjonsdyrmedisin","doi":"10.52734/5be9k482","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sexual contact between humans and animals is known from early times, but the\n prevalence remains unknown. Research on individuals who have sexual contact with animals\n has largely been conducted on individuals who are incarcerated or who are recruited from\n the internet and who consider themselves zoophiles. This paper is a synopsis of some of\n the available literature from the perspectives of law, veterinary science and\n psychology. Whether human beings who conduct sexual acts with animals are at increased\n risk of interpersonal violence is discussed. Some claim that zoophilia may be a sexual\n orientation and that sexual contact should be tolerated as long as the animal does not\n suffer. Others stress that sexual contact with animals is always wrong because it\n involves coercion, violates the rights of others, and because the animal cannot provide\n genuine consent or report abuse. This lack of consent is paramount to current\n psychiatric classifications of zoophilia. Reporting of animal abuse is one of the\n exceptions to health professionals’ duty of confidentiality.","PeriodicalId":344686,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Norsk psykologforening","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52734/5be9k482","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人类和动物之间的性接触很早就为人所知,但其流行程度尚不清楚。对与动物发生性接触的人的研究主要是在被监禁的人或从互联网上招募的人身上进行的,这些人认为自己是动物癖。本文从法学、兽医学和心理学的角度对现有文献进行了综述。与动物发生性行为的人是否会增加人际暴力的风险。一些人声称,动物癖可能是一种性取向,只要动物不受苦,性接触就应该被容忍。另一些人则强调,与动物发生性接触永远是错误的,因为它涉及胁迫,侵犯了他人的权利,而且动物无法真正同意或报告虐待。这种缺乏同意是目前精神病学对动物癖的分类中最重要的。报告虐待动物是卫生专业人员保密义务的例外情况之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mennesker som utøver seksuelle handlinger med dyr
Sexual contact between humans and animals is known from early times, but the prevalence remains unknown. Research on individuals who have sexual contact with animals has largely been conducted on individuals who are incarcerated or who are recruited from the internet and who consider themselves zoophiles. This paper is a synopsis of some of the available literature from the perspectives of law, veterinary science and psychology. Whether human beings who conduct sexual acts with animals are at increased risk of interpersonal violence is discussed. Some claim that zoophilia may be a sexual orientation and that sexual contact should be tolerated as long as the animal does not suffer. Others stress that sexual contact with animals is always wrong because it involves coercion, violates the rights of others, and because the animal cannot provide genuine consent or report abuse. This lack of consent is paramount to current psychiatric classifications of zoophilia. Reporting of animal abuse is one of the exceptions to health professionals’ duty of confidentiality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信