聚类分析揭示大学生科学探究的真实轨迹

Melanie E. Peffer, David Quigley, M. Mostowfi
{"title":"聚类分析揭示大学生科学探究的真实轨迹","authors":"Melanie E. Peffer, David Quigley, M. Mostowfi","doi":"10.1145/3303772.3303831","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science education reforms in the United States call for an emphasis on teaching of scientific practices, such as inquiry. Previous work examined expert versus novice practices in authentic science inquiry and found although experts have fairly consistent inquiry strategies, novices exist on a continuum. In this paper, we extend our previous qualitative work to quantitatively analyze differences in inquiry practices among novices. Using clustering analysis, we found that non-science majors who performed simple investigations tended to cluster together and biology majors who performed complex investigations also tended to cluster together. We observed two additional clusters that contain both non-science majors and biology majors, but who performed distinct inquiry strategies. This raises some critical questions about how to pedagogically target students within each cluster.","PeriodicalId":382957,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clustering Analysis Reveals Authentic Science Inquiry Trajectories Among Undergraduates\",\"authors\":\"Melanie E. Peffer, David Quigley, M. Mostowfi\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3303772.3303831\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science education reforms in the United States call for an emphasis on teaching of scientific practices, such as inquiry. Previous work examined expert versus novice practices in authentic science inquiry and found although experts have fairly consistent inquiry strategies, novices exist on a continuum. In this paper, we extend our previous qualitative work to quantitatively analyze differences in inquiry practices among novices. Using clustering analysis, we found that non-science majors who performed simple investigations tended to cluster together and biology majors who performed complex investigations also tended to cluster together. We observed two additional clusters that contain both non-science majors and biology majors, but who performed distinct inquiry strategies. This raises some critical questions about how to pedagogically target students within each cluster.\",\"PeriodicalId\":382957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303831\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3303772.3303831","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

美国的科学教育改革要求强调科学实践的教学,例如探究。以前的工作研究了专家和新手在真实科学探究中的实践,发现尽管专家有相当一致的探究策略,但新手存在于一个连续体中。在本文中,我们扩展了之前的定性工作,以定量分析新手在探究实践中的差异。通过聚类分析,我们发现从事简单调查的非理工科学生倾向于聚集在一起,从事复杂调查的生物专业学生也倾向于聚集在一起。我们观察到另外两个集群既包括非科学专业的学生,也包括生物专业的学生,但他们执行不同的探究策略。这就提出了一些关于如何在教学上针对每个集群中的学生的关键问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clustering Analysis Reveals Authentic Science Inquiry Trajectories Among Undergraduates
Science education reforms in the United States call for an emphasis on teaching of scientific practices, such as inquiry. Previous work examined expert versus novice practices in authentic science inquiry and found although experts have fairly consistent inquiry strategies, novices exist on a continuum. In this paper, we extend our previous qualitative work to quantitatively analyze differences in inquiry practices among novices. Using clustering analysis, we found that non-science majors who performed simple investigations tended to cluster together and biology majors who performed complex investigations also tended to cluster together. We observed two additional clusters that contain both non-science majors and biology majors, but who performed distinct inquiry strategies. This raises some critical questions about how to pedagogically target students within each cluster.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信