直肠癌术前短疗程与长疗程放疗:一项基于证据的病例报告

Ayu Santika Santaningrum, Fenny Tjuatja, G. A. Pradana, Hari Murti Wijaya, J. Anton, Regina Wulandari, S. Dewi, Sudibio, Wahyu Diyana
{"title":"直肠癌术前短疗程与长疗程放疗:一项基于证据的病例报告","authors":"Ayu Santika Santaningrum, Fenny Tjuatja, G. A. Pradana, Hari Murti Wijaya, J. Anton, Regina Wulandari, S. Dewi, Sudibio, Wahyu Diyana","doi":"10.32532/jori.v8i2.70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Surgery is the mainstay therapy for colorectal carcinoma with curative intent, while radiotherapy and chemotherapy act as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. The desicion for surgery depends on tumor resectability. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy, both short-course radiotherapy (SRT) or long-course radiotherapy (LRT) with or without concurent chemtherapy, is aimed to increase tumor resectability. This article compares advantages of SRT and LRT. Method We designed a search filter using relevant synonyms for the domain: “rectal carcinoma”, “resectable”, “preoperative radiotherapy”, and “short-course”. Publications are retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO using MESH terms and search terms in title and abstract fields. Articles’ titles and abstracts from search result are screened for relevance. Eligible articles are selected based on inclusion and exclusion criterias. Selected articles are critically appraised for methods validity. Result Six articles are included in our study, consists of four randomized clinical trials and four metaanalyses. Conclusion SRT is as effective as LRT with or without chemotherapy in terms of overall survival, disease free survival, local recurrence rate, disease metastasis rate, free resection rate, and grade 3-4 toxicity. LRT with or without chemotherapy showed superiority in increasing pathological complete response rate and sphincter preservation rate. SRT is a better choice in centers with a long waiting list.","PeriodicalId":130312,"journal":{"name":"Radioterapi & Onkologi Indonesia","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-course versus Long-Course Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: an Evidence Based Case report\",\"authors\":\"Ayu Santika Santaningrum, Fenny Tjuatja, G. A. Pradana, Hari Murti Wijaya, J. Anton, Regina Wulandari, S. Dewi, Sudibio, Wahyu Diyana\",\"doi\":\"10.32532/jori.v8i2.70\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background Surgery is the mainstay therapy for colorectal carcinoma with curative intent, while radiotherapy and chemotherapy act as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. The desicion for surgery depends on tumor resectability. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy, both short-course radiotherapy (SRT) or long-course radiotherapy (LRT) with or without concurent chemtherapy, is aimed to increase tumor resectability. This article compares advantages of SRT and LRT. Method We designed a search filter using relevant synonyms for the domain: “rectal carcinoma”, “resectable”, “preoperative radiotherapy”, and “short-course”. Publications are retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO using MESH terms and search terms in title and abstract fields. Articles’ titles and abstracts from search result are screened for relevance. Eligible articles are selected based on inclusion and exclusion criterias. Selected articles are critically appraised for methods validity. Result Six articles are included in our study, consists of four randomized clinical trials and four metaanalyses. Conclusion SRT is as effective as LRT with or without chemotherapy in terms of overall survival, disease free survival, local recurrence rate, disease metastasis rate, free resection rate, and grade 3-4 toxicity. LRT with or without chemotherapy showed superiority in increasing pathological complete response rate and sphincter preservation rate. SRT is a better choice in centers with a long waiting list.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radioterapi & Onkologi Indonesia\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radioterapi & Onkologi Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32532/jori.v8i2.70\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radioterapi & Onkologi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32532/jori.v8i2.70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景手术是结直肠癌的主要治疗手段,放疗和化疗作为辅助或新辅助治疗。手术的决定取决于肿瘤的可切除性。新辅助放疗,包括短期放疗(SRT)或长期放疗(LRT),伴有或不伴有化疗,目的是增加肿瘤的可切除性。本文比较了SRT和LRT的优点。方法采用“直肠癌”、“可切除”、“术前放疗”、“短期”等相关同义词设计搜索过滤器。出版物从PubMed、Cochrane Library和EBSCO中检索,使用MESH术语和标题和摘要字段中的搜索术语。文章的标题和摘要从搜索结果筛选相关性。根据纳入和排除标准选择符合条件的文章。对选定的文章进行方法有效性的严格评估。结果本研究共纳入6篇文章,包括4项随机临床试验和4项meta分析。结论在总生存期、无病生存期、局部复发率、疾病转移率、游离切除率和3-4级毒性方面,SRT与LRT在化疗或不化疗方面的效果相同。LRT加或不加化疗在提高病理完全缓解率和括约肌保存率方面均有优势。在等候名单很长的中心,SRT是一个更好的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Short-course versus Long-Course Preoperative Radiotherapy in Rectal Cancer: an Evidence Based Case report
Background Surgery is the mainstay therapy for colorectal carcinoma with curative intent, while radiotherapy and chemotherapy act as adjuvant or neoadjuvant therapy. The desicion for surgery depends on tumor resectability. Neoadjuvant radiotherapy, both short-course radiotherapy (SRT) or long-course radiotherapy (LRT) with or without concurent chemtherapy, is aimed to increase tumor resectability. This article compares advantages of SRT and LRT. Method We designed a search filter using relevant synonyms for the domain: “rectal carcinoma”, “resectable”, “preoperative radiotherapy”, and “short-course”. Publications are retrieved from PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EBSCO using MESH terms and search terms in title and abstract fields. Articles’ titles and abstracts from search result are screened for relevance. Eligible articles are selected based on inclusion and exclusion criterias. Selected articles are critically appraised for methods validity. Result Six articles are included in our study, consists of four randomized clinical trials and four metaanalyses. Conclusion SRT is as effective as LRT with or without chemotherapy in terms of overall survival, disease free survival, local recurrence rate, disease metastasis rate, free resection rate, and grade 3-4 toxicity. LRT with or without chemotherapy showed superiority in increasing pathological complete response rate and sphincter preservation rate. SRT is a better choice in centers with a long waiting list.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信