K. Venugopal, A. Vora, Anil Daxini, P. Dadhich, S. Bhagat, Saiprasad Patil, H. Barkate, N. Goto, Y. Ikuyama, Jumpei, Akahane, Makoto Kosaka, A. Ushiki, Yoshiaki, Kitaguchi, Masanori Yasuo, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Akemi, Matsuo, Tsutomu Hachiya, Gen Ideura, Yoshitaka, Yamazaki, Masayuki Hanaoka, Katherina Koesling, Firaz, Charfare, Musab Ahmad, Syed Ahmad, Yussef Haider
{"title":"P5‐93:法匹拉韦治疗轻度COVID - 19的疗效和耐受性:来自印度的真实世界经验","authors":"K. Venugopal, A. Vora, Anil Daxini, P. Dadhich, S. Bhagat, Saiprasad Patil, H. Barkate, N. Goto, Y. Ikuyama, Jumpei, Akahane, Makoto Kosaka, A. Ushiki, Yoshiaki, Kitaguchi, Masanori Yasuo, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Akemi, Matsuo, Tsutomu Hachiya, Gen Ideura, Yoshitaka, Yamazaki, Masayuki Hanaoka, Katherina Koesling, Firaz, Charfare, Musab Ahmad, Syed Ahmad, Yussef Haider","doi":"10.1111/resp.14150_300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aims: Favipiravir is approved in India for mildmoderate COVID-19. We aimed to observe effectiveness & safety of favipiravir in mild COVID-19 in real world setting. Methods: Retrospective cohort study was conducted in favipiravir treated mild COVID-19 patients(SpO2≥94) at 4 Indian centres after ethics committee approval. Medical records from Oct 2020 Feb 2021 were analyzed to capture required details. Results: 283 mild COVID-19 patients received favipiravir. Mean age was 50.5 16.7 years, M:F=1.4:1. 51.6% had co-morbidities, with hypertension (40%) and diabetes (35.7%) as frequent ones. 26.1% had multiple (≥2) co-morbidities. Mean SpO2 & RR at baseline was 96.9 1.5% & 21.5 12/min respectively. Overall CRP (30.3 46.3), d-Dimer (433.5 746.4), serum ferritin (321.8 329.5 and LDH (234.4 99.7) were raised at baseline. Fever (90.8%), cough (59.4%), myalgia (32.5%) and fatigue (30.4%) were common presenting symptoms. 55.1% required hospitalization. Favipiravir was prescribed for median duration of 14 days. 12.4% received systemic steroids. Fever resolution occurred in median duration of 4 days(1-10 d). Fever resolved in 86.2% and 90.8% by day 7 and 10. Median time to clinical cure was 5 days (1-13 days). Clinical cure rate at day 7, 10 and 14 was 79.2%, 90.5% and 94.7%. At Baseline 47 (16.6%) patients were on respiratory support which reduced from day 3 (n=34) (12%) to day 14 (n=2) (0.7%). (n=15) 5.3% had disease progression with mortality in 2. TEAEs were observed in (n=23)8.1%. Elevation of liver transaminases 14 (5%), loosemotion 5 (1.8%) weremost frequent TEAEs. Conclusion: Favipiravir was found effective in majority of mild COVID-19 patients despite high risk association. It was well tolerated and no new safety signals were detected.","PeriodicalId":162871,"journal":{"name":"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"P5‐93: Therapeutic effectiveness and tolerability of favipiravir in mild COVID‐19: Real world experience from India\",\"authors\":\"K. Venugopal, A. Vora, Anil Daxini, P. Dadhich, S. Bhagat, Saiprasad Patil, H. Barkate, N. Goto, Y. Ikuyama, Jumpei, Akahane, Makoto Kosaka, A. Ushiki, Yoshiaki, Kitaguchi, Masanori Yasuo, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Akemi, Matsuo, Tsutomu Hachiya, Gen Ideura, Yoshitaka, Yamazaki, Masayuki Hanaoka, Katherina Koesling, Firaz, Charfare, Musab Ahmad, Syed Ahmad, Yussef Haider\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/resp.14150_300\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background & Aims: Favipiravir is approved in India for mildmoderate COVID-19. We aimed to observe effectiveness & safety of favipiravir in mild COVID-19 in real world setting. Methods: Retrospective cohort study was conducted in favipiravir treated mild COVID-19 patients(SpO2≥94) at 4 Indian centres after ethics committee approval. Medical records from Oct 2020 Feb 2021 were analyzed to capture required details. Results: 283 mild COVID-19 patients received favipiravir. Mean age was 50.5 16.7 years, M:F=1.4:1. 51.6% had co-morbidities, with hypertension (40%) and diabetes (35.7%) as frequent ones. 26.1% had multiple (≥2) co-morbidities. Mean SpO2 & RR at baseline was 96.9 1.5% & 21.5 12/min respectively. Overall CRP (30.3 46.3), d-Dimer (433.5 746.4), serum ferritin (321.8 329.5 and LDH (234.4 99.7) were raised at baseline. Fever (90.8%), cough (59.4%), myalgia (32.5%) and fatigue (30.4%) were common presenting symptoms. 55.1% required hospitalization. Favipiravir was prescribed for median duration of 14 days. 12.4% received systemic steroids. Fever resolution occurred in median duration of 4 days(1-10 d). Fever resolved in 86.2% and 90.8% by day 7 and 10. Median time to clinical cure was 5 days (1-13 days). Clinical cure rate at day 7, 10 and 14 was 79.2%, 90.5% and 94.7%. At Baseline 47 (16.6%) patients were on respiratory support which reduced from day 3 (n=34) (12%) to day 14 (n=2) (0.7%). (n=15) 5.3% had disease progression with mortality in 2. TEAEs were observed in (n=23)8.1%. Elevation of liver transaminases 14 (5%), loosemotion 5 (1.8%) weremost frequent TEAEs. Conclusion: Favipiravir was found effective in majority of mild COVID-19 patients despite high risk association. It was well tolerated and no new safety signals were detected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":162871,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14150_300\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respirology (Carlton, Vic.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/resp.14150_300","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
P5‐93: Therapeutic effectiveness and tolerability of favipiravir in mild COVID‐19: Real world experience from India
Background & Aims: Favipiravir is approved in India for mildmoderate COVID-19. We aimed to observe effectiveness & safety of favipiravir in mild COVID-19 in real world setting. Methods: Retrospective cohort study was conducted in favipiravir treated mild COVID-19 patients(SpO2≥94) at 4 Indian centres after ethics committee approval. Medical records from Oct 2020 Feb 2021 were analyzed to capture required details. Results: 283 mild COVID-19 patients received favipiravir. Mean age was 50.5 16.7 years, M:F=1.4:1. 51.6% had co-morbidities, with hypertension (40%) and diabetes (35.7%) as frequent ones. 26.1% had multiple (≥2) co-morbidities. Mean SpO2 & RR at baseline was 96.9 1.5% & 21.5 12/min respectively. Overall CRP (30.3 46.3), d-Dimer (433.5 746.4), serum ferritin (321.8 329.5 and LDH (234.4 99.7) were raised at baseline. Fever (90.8%), cough (59.4%), myalgia (32.5%) and fatigue (30.4%) were common presenting symptoms. 55.1% required hospitalization. Favipiravir was prescribed for median duration of 14 days. 12.4% received systemic steroids. Fever resolution occurred in median duration of 4 days(1-10 d). Fever resolved in 86.2% and 90.8% by day 7 and 10. Median time to clinical cure was 5 days (1-13 days). Clinical cure rate at day 7, 10 and 14 was 79.2%, 90.5% and 94.7%. At Baseline 47 (16.6%) patients were on respiratory support which reduced from day 3 (n=34) (12%) to day 14 (n=2) (0.7%). (n=15) 5.3% had disease progression with mortality in 2. TEAEs were observed in (n=23)8.1%. Elevation of liver transaminases 14 (5%), loosemotion 5 (1.8%) weremost frequent TEAEs. Conclusion: Favipiravir was found effective in majority of mild COVID-19 patients despite high risk association. It was well tolerated and no new safety signals were detected.