对Lisa Fishbayn Joffe的回应和讨论要点

Laliv Clenman
{"title":"对Lisa Fishbayn Joffe的回应和讨论要点","authors":"Laliv Clenman","doi":"10.31826/mjj-2019-130109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This piece is a response to the challenging and inspirational paper presented by Dr. Fishbayn Joffe as part of the University of Manchester’s Sherman Conversations on the last fifty years in Jewish Studies and Gender Studies. I engage with Dr. Fishbayn Joffe’s focus on various attempts to resolve the legal problems related to kiddushin, and explore these issues through my academic experiences learning and teaching about kiddushin with a wide range of scholars and students over the past 25 years. After examining various avenues for legal change, given the inherent inequity of kiddushin, I ultimately argue in favour of its abandonment.","PeriodicalId":305040,"journal":{"name":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Response to Lisa Fishbayn Joffe and Discussion Points\",\"authors\":\"Laliv Clenman\",\"doi\":\"10.31826/mjj-2019-130109\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This piece is a response to the challenging and inspirational paper presented by Dr. Fishbayn Joffe as part of the University of Manchester’s Sherman Conversations on the last fifty years in Jewish Studies and Gender Studies. I engage with Dr. Fishbayn Joffe’s focus on various attempts to resolve the legal problems related to kiddushin, and explore these issues through my academic experiences learning and teaching about kiddushin with a wide range of scholars and students over the past 25 years. After examining various avenues for legal change, given the inherent inequity of kiddushin, I ultimately argue in favour of its abandonment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":305040,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2019-130109\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melilah: Manchester Journal of Jewish Studies (1759-1953)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31826/mjj-2019-130109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章是对Fishbayn Joffe博士发表的具有挑战性和鼓舞人心的论文的回应,该论文是曼彻斯特大学谢尔曼对话的一部分,该对话是关于过去五十年犹太研究和性别研究的。我参与了Fishbayn Joffe博士对解决与kiddushin有关的法律问题的各种尝试的关注,并通过我在过去25年中与广泛的学者和学生一起学习和教授kiddushin的学术经验来探索这些问题。在考察了法律改革的各种途径之后,考虑到基德申固有的不公平,我最终赞成放弃它。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Response to Lisa Fishbayn Joffe and Discussion Points
This piece is a response to the challenging and inspirational paper presented by Dr. Fishbayn Joffe as part of the University of Manchester’s Sherman Conversations on the last fifty years in Jewish Studies and Gender Studies. I engage with Dr. Fishbayn Joffe’s focus on various attempts to resolve the legal problems related to kiddushin, and explore these issues through my academic experiences learning and teaching about kiddushin with a wide range of scholars and students over the past 25 years. After examining various avenues for legal change, given the inherent inequity of kiddushin, I ultimately argue in favour of its abandonment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信