债务、紧缩与社会权利的结构性反应

B. Warwick
{"title":"债务、紧缩与社会权利的结构性反应","authors":"B. Warwick","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198810445.003.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Austerity measures—the set of economic policies implemented with the aim of reducing government budget deficits—are a key component of economic adjustment programmes prescribed by the international financial institutions in the context of their efforts to address sovereign debt and other financial crises. They essentially entail public spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both. While multilateral creditors impose austerity in all debt restructuring programmes, economists generally agree that in order to sustain growth, productivity and consumer confidence, it is imperative that in situations of debt crises the government pour money into the economy (as was the case in post-2007 USA) rather than restrict liquidity. Hence, austerity is fundamentally antithetical to financial sense and if the aim is to repay creditors then higher consumer spending is beneficial as are tax decreases. The chapter explains austerity from a legal and financial perspective and argues that its imposition serves political objectives.","PeriodicalId":181409,"journal":{"name":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Human Rights (Topic)","volume":"93 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-02-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Debt, Austerity, and the Structural Responses of Social Rights\",\"authors\":\"B. Warwick\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198810445.003.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Austerity measures—the set of economic policies implemented with the aim of reducing government budget deficits—are a key component of economic adjustment programmes prescribed by the international financial institutions in the context of their efforts to address sovereign debt and other financial crises. They essentially entail public spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both. While multilateral creditors impose austerity in all debt restructuring programmes, economists generally agree that in order to sustain growth, productivity and consumer confidence, it is imperative that in situations of debt crises the government pour money into the economy (as was the case in post-2007 USA) rather than restrict liquidity. Hence, austerity is fundamentally antithetical to financial sense and if the aim is to repay creditors then higher consumer spending is beneficial as are tax decreases. The chapter explains austerity from a legal and financial perspective and argues that its imposition serves political objectives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":181409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"LSN: Other Public International Law: Human Rights (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"93 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-02-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"LSN: Other Public International Law: Human Rights (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198810445.003.0021\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LSN: Other Public International Law: Human Rights (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198810445.003.0021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

紧缩措施——旨在减少政府预算赤字而实施的一套经济政策——是国际金融机构在努力解决主权债务和其他金融危机的背景下制定的经济调整计划的关键组成部分。它们本质上需要削减公共支出,增加税收,或者两者兼而有之。虽然多边债权人在所有债务重组计划中都要求紧缩,但经济学家普遍认为,为了维持增长、生产率和消费者信心,在债务危机的情况下,政府必须向经济中注入资金(就像2007年后美国的情况一样),而不是限制流动性。因此,财政紧缩从根本上与财务意识是对立的,如果目标是偿还债权人,那么提高消费者支出和减税都是有益的。这一章从法律和金融的角度解释了紧缩政策,并认为实行紧缩政策是为了达到政治目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Debt, Austerity, and the Structural Responses of Social Rights
Austerity measures—the set of economic policies implemented with the aim of reducing government budget deficits—are a key component of economic adjustment programmes prescribed by the international financial institutions in the context of their efforts to address sovereign debt and other financial crises. They essentially entail public spending cuts, tax increases, or a combination of both. While multilateral creditors impose austerity in all debt restructuring programmes, economists generally agree that in order to sustain growth, productivity and consumer confidence, it is imperative that in situations of debt crises the government pour money into the economy (as was the case in post-2007 USA) rather than restrict liquidity. Hence, austerity is fundamentally antithetical to financial sense and if the aim is to repay creditors then higher consumer spending is beneficial as are tax decreases. The chapter explains austerity from a legal and financial perspective and argues that its imposition serves political objectives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信