法律保证概念下公证员实为国家官员的司法审查

Rindra Agung Wiguna
{"title":"法律保证概念下公证员实为国家官员的司法审查","authors":"Rindra Agung Wiguna","doi":"10.30659/sanlar.4.2.641-651","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In legal research, legal theory becomes a scalpel to analyze problems using legal certainty theory and liability theory. This study uses three (3) sources of data, namely legal materials, namely primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, while data collection techniques use library research. Data analysis using qualitative analysis method using deductive logic and described analytically descriptive. The results of the research found the rules regarding the prohibition of a Notary concurrently serving as a state official in Article 17 paragraph (1) letter d of Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to Act No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. So it can be concluded that a Notary concurrently serving as a state official is a violation of the law, the Notary Supervisory Board has the right to conduct an examination of alleged violations and impose sanctions on a Notary if proven to have committed a violation.","PeriodicalId":279949,"journal":{"name":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Juridical Review of Notaries Who Actually As State Officers in the Concept of Legal Assurance\",\"authors\":\"Rindra Agung Wiguna\",\"doi\":\"10.30659/sanlar.4.2.641-651\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In legal research, legal theory becomes a scalpel to analyze problems using legal certainty theory and liability theory. This study uses three (3) sources of data, namely legal materials, namely primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, while data collection techniques use library research. Data analysis using qualitative analysis method using deductive logic and described analytically descriptive. The results of the research found the rules regarding the prohibition of a Notary concurrently serving as a state official in Article 17 paragraph (1) letter d of Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to Act No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. So it can be concluded that a Notary concurrently serving as a state official is a violation of the law, the Notary Supervisory Board has the right to conduct an examination of alleged violations and impose sanctions on a Notary if proven to have committed a violation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":279949,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.2.641-651\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sultan Agung Notary Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.2.641-651","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在法学研究中,法律理论成为运用法律确定性理论和责任理论分析问题的手术刀。本研究使用三(3)个数据来源,即法律资料,即一级,二级和三级法律资料,而数据收集技术使用图书馆研究。数据分析采用定性分析方法,采用演绎逻辑和描述性分析方法进行描述。研究结果发现,2014年第2号法案第17条第(1)款d项规定了关于禁止公证员兼任国家官员的规则,该法案涉及对2004年第30号法案关于公证员职位的修正案。因此,可以得出结论,公证员兼任国家官员违反了法律,公证员监督委员会有权对涉嫌违法行为进行审查,并在证明有违法行为的情况下对公证员进行制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Juridical Review of Notaries Who Actually As State Officers in the Concept of Legal Assurance
In legal research, legal theory becomes a scalpel to analyze problems using legal certainty theory and liability theory. This study uses three (3) sources of data, namely legal materials, namely primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials, while data collection techniques use library research. Data analysis using qualitative analysis method using deductive logic and described analytically descriptive. The results of the research found the rules regarding the prohibition of a Notary concurrently serving as a state official in Article 17 paragraph (1) letter d of Act No. 2 of 2014 concerning amendments to Act No. 30 of 2004 concerning Notary Positions. So it can be concluded that a Notary concurrently serving as a state official is a violation of the law, the Notary Supervisory Board has the right to conduct an examination of alleged violations and impose sanctions on a Notary if proven to have committed a violation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信