横流中速度分布对射流拓扑结构的影响

D. New, T. Lim, S. Luo
{"title":"横流中速度分布对射流拓扑结构的影响","authors":"D. New, T. Lim, S. Luo","doi":"10.1615/tsfp1.1040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The effect of jet exit velocity profile on the topological structure of a round jet in a cross flow is investigated experimentally using the laser induced fluorescence technique. The study is focused on two velocity profiles, namely top-hat and parabolic profiles. The jet Reynolds number considered ranges from 350 to 1750, with the corresponding velocity ratios varying from 1 to 5. The results show that the top-hat jets are more unstable and likely to shed shear layer vortices than parabolic jets. Interestingly, it is found that the parabolic jets penetrate higher into the flow, but the largescale structures appear to be less coherent than those of the top-hat jets. These findings suggest that the characteristics of a jet in a cross flow is not only a function of the Reynolds number and the velocity ratio, but also a function of the shear layer thickness and hence velocity profile. INTRODUCTION The study of jets in cross flows (JICF) has immense relevance to engineering applications such as film cooling for turbine and combustors, fuel injection for burners, thrust reversers for propulsive systems as well as in the development of S/VTOL aircrafts. Its relevance in areas involving the dispersion of effluents in waterways and of pollutants in the atmosphere via chimneys and smoke stacks has long been recognized by the research community. Early research on JICF was confined mainly to determining the mean paths of the deflected jets (Jordinson, 1956 and Margason, 1968). Later, the focus was shifted to the measurement of the axial velocity decay and turbulence intensity along the jet axis by Keffer & Baines (1963), Pratte & Baines (1967) and Andreopoulos (1982 and 1985). Their results show that fluid entrainment and hence the mixing process, is substantially more intensive for a JICF than for a Figure 1 : Schematics of a jet in cross flow phenomenon as illustrated by Kelso et al (1996). free jet. This resulted in a surge of research focusing on better mixing of fluids. Recent studies see a rise in the use of computational simulations to predict both the fluid entrainment and the deflected jet trajectory as well as to verify earlier experimental work (Yuan & Street, 1996 and 1998). The numerical results of Yuan & Street looked promising and hold great potential for further investigations. A more detailed review of the subject over the last fifty years can be found in Margason (1993), Fric & Roshko (1994) and Kelso et al (1996). Earlier experimental work on JCIF has revealed a complex system of interacting vortical structures resulting from the interaction between a transverse round jet and a cross flow boundary layer (Figure 1). The main flow features can be summarised as follows: Flat wall Horseshoe vortex system Shear layer Counter-rotating vortex pair","PeriodicalId":222466,"journal":{"name":"Proceeding of First Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ON THE EFFECTS OF VELOCITY PROFILES ON THE TOPOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF A JET IN CROSS FLOW\",\"authors\":\"D. New, T. Lim, S. Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1615/tsfp1.1040\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The effect of jet exit velocity profile on the topological structure of a round jet in a cross flow is investigated experimentally using the laser induced fluorescence technique. The study is focused on two velocity profiles, namely top-hat and parabolic profiles. The jet Reynolds number considered ranges from 350 to 1750, with the corresponding velocity ratios varying from 1 to 5. The results show that the top-hat jets are more unstable and likely to shed shear layer vortices than parabolic jets. Interestingly, it is found that the parabolic jets penetrate higher into the flow, but the largescale structures appear to be less coherent than those of the top-hat jets. These findings suggest that the characteristics of a jet in a cross flow is not only a function of the Reynolds number and the velocity ratio, but also a function of the shear layer thickness and hence velocity profile. INTRODUCTION The study of jets in cross flows (JICF) has immense relevance to engineering applications such as film cooling for turbine and combustors, fuel injection for burners, thrust reversers for propulsive systems as well as in the development of S/VTOL aircrafts. Its relevance in areas involving the dispersion of effluents in waterways and of pollutants in the atmosphere via chimneys and smoke stacks has long been recognized by the research community. Early research on JICF was confined mainly to determining the mean paths of the deflected jets (Jordinson, 1956 and Margason, 1968). Later, the focus was shifted to the measurement of the axial velocity decay and turbulence intensity along the jet axis by Keffer & Baines (1963), Pratte & Baines (1967) and Andreopoulos (1982 and 1985). Their results show that fluid entrainment and hence the mixing process, is substantially more intensive for a JICF than for a Figure 1 : Schematics of a jet in cross flow phenomenon as illustrated by Kelso et al (1996). free jet. This resulted in a surge of research focusing on better mixing of fluids. Recent studies see a rise in the use of computational simulations to predict both the fluid entrainment and the deflected jet trajectory as well as to verify earlier experimental work (Yuan & Street, 1996 and 1998). The numerical results of Yuan & Street looked promising and hold great potential for further investigations. A more detailed review of the subject over the last fifty years can be found in Margason (1993), Fric & Roshko (1994) and Kelso et al (1996). Earlier experimental work on JCIF has revealed a complex system of interacting vortical structures resulting from the interaction between a transverse round jet and a cross flow boundary layer (Figure 1). The main flow features can be summarised as follows: Flat wall Horseshoe vortex system Shear layer Counter-rotating vortex pair\",\"PeriodicalId\":222466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceeding of First Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceeding of First Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp1.1040\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceeding of First Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1615/tsfp1.1040","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

利用激光诱导荧光技术研究了横向流动中射流出口速度分布对圆形射流拓扑结构的影响。研究的重点是两个速度剖面,即顶帽型和抛物线型。考虑的射流雷诺数范围为350至1750,相应的速度比范围为1至5。结果表明,顶帽射流比抛物射流更不稳定,更容易脱落剪切层涡。有趣的是,研究发现抛物线射流在气流中穿透得更高,但大尺度结构似乎不如顶帽射流连贯。这些发现表明,横流中射流的特性不仅是雷诺数和速度比的函数,而且是剪切层厚度和速度分布的函数。交叉流射流(JICF)的研究与涡轮和燃烧室的气膜冷却、燃烧器的燃油喷射、推进系统的推力逆转器以及S/VTOL飞机的开发等工程应用有着巨大的相关性。它与水道中污水的分散以及通过烟囱和烟囱向大气中排放污染物等领域的相关性早已被研究界认识到。早期对JICF的研究主要局限于确定偏转射流的平均路径(Jordinson, 1956和Margason, 1968)。后来,Keffer & Baines(1963)、Pratte & Baines(1967)和Andreopoulos(1982和1985)将焦点转移到沿射流轴向速度衰减和湍流强度的测量上。他们的研究结果表明,流体夹带和混合过程在JICF中比在图1中更为强烈:Kelso等人(1996)所示的横流现象中的射流示意图。免费的飞机。这导致了对更好地混合流体的研究激增。最近的研究发现,越来越多地使用计算模拟来预测流体夹带和偏转的射流轨迹,并验证早期的实验工作(Yuan & Street, 1996年和1998年)。Yuan & Street的数值结果看起来很有希望,并且具有进一步研究的巨大潜力。Margason(1993)、Fric & Roshko(1994)和Kelso et al(1996)对过去50年这一主题进行了更详细的回顾。早期在JCIF上的实验工作已经揭示了一个复杂的相互作用的涡结构系统,由横向圆形射流和横向流动边界层之间的相互作用产生(图1)。主要的流动特征可以概括为:平壁马蹄涡系统剪切层反向旋转涡对
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ON THE EFFECTS OF VELOCITY PROFILES ON THE TOPOLOGICAL STRUCTURE OF A JET IN CROSS FLOW
The effect of jet exit velocity profile on the topological structure of a round jet in a cross flow is investigated experimentally using the laser induced fluorescence technique. The study is focused on two velocity profiles, namely top-hat and parabolic profiles. The jet Reynolds number considered ranges from 350 to 1750, with the corresponding velocity ratios varying from 1 to 5. The results show that the top-hat jets are more unstable and likely to shed shear layer vortices than parabolic jets. Interestingly, it is found that the parabolic jets penetrate higher into the flow, but the largescale structures appear to be less coherent than those of the top-hat jets. These findings suggest that the characteristics of a jet in a cross flow is not only a function of the Reynolds number and the velocity ratio, but also a function of the shear layer thickness and hence velocity profile. INTRODUCTION The study of jets in cross flows (JICF) has immense relevance to engineering applications such as film cooling for turbine and combustors, fuel injection for burners, thrust reversers for propulsive systems as well as in the development of S/VTOL aircrafts. Its relevance in areas involving the dispersion of effluents in waterways and of pollutants in the atmosphere via chimneys and smoke stacks has long been recognized by the research community. Early research on JICF was confined mainly to determining the mean paths of the deflected jets (Jordinson, 1956 and Margason, 1968). Later, the focus was shifted to the measurement of the axial velocity decay and turbulence intensity along the jet axis by Keffer & Baines (1963), Pratte & Baines (1967) and Andreopoulos (1982 and 1985). Their results show that fluid entrainment and hence the mixing process, is substantially more intensive for a JICF than for a Figure 1 : Schematics of a jet in cross flow phenomenon as illustrated by Kelso et al (1996). free jet. This resulted in a surge of research focusing on better mixing of fluids. Recent studies see a rise in the use of computational simulations to predict both the fluid entrainment and the deflected jet trajectory as well as to verify earlier experimental work (Yuan & Street, 1996 and 1998). The numerical results of Yuan & Street looked promising and hold great potential for further investigations. A more detailed review of the subject over the last fifty years can be found in Margason (1993), Fric & Roshko (1994) and Kelso et al (1996). Earlier experimental work on JCIF has revealed a complex system of interacting vortical structures resulting from the interaction between a transverse round jet and a cross flow boundary layer (Figure 1). The main flow features can be summarised as follows: Flat wall Horseshoe vortex system Shear layer Counter-rotating vortex pair
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信