考虑零售商组合决策偏差的退货策略建模

J. Zhu, Fugen Song
{"title":"考虑零售商组合决策偏差的退货策略建模","authors":"J. Zhu, Fugen Song","doi":"10.1109/ICRMEM.2008.45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers a supply chain model in which a single supplier sells a single product to a single retailer who faces the newsvendor problem. The retailer has combined decision bias. The results show that the supply chain can achieve channel coordination with return policy, the return price increases as the retailerpsilas waste-averse preferences increases and decreases as stockout-averse preferences increases. And we demonstrate that the expected profit and utility of return policy are more than that of the decentralized decision making system by using numerical examples.","PeriodicalId":430801,"journal":{"name":"2008 International Conference on Risk Management & Engineering Management","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modeling for Return Policy with Retailer's Combined Decision Bias\",\"authors\":\"J. Zhu, Fugen Song\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICRMEM.2008.45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers a supply chain model in which a single supplier sells a single product to a single retailer who faces the newsvendor problem. The retailer has combined decision bias. The results show that the supply chain can achieve channel coordination with return policy, the return price increases as the retailerpsilas waste-averse preferences increases and decreases as stockout-averse preferences increases. And we demonstrate that the expected profit and utility of return policy are more than that of the decentralized decision making system by using numerical examples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430801,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2008 International Conference on Risk Management & Engineering Management\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2008 International Conference on Risk Management & Engineering Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRMEM.2008.45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2008 International Conference on Risk Management & Engineering Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICRMEM.2008.45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文考虑了一个供应链模型,其中一个供应商向一个面临报贩问题的零售商销售一种产品。零售商有综合决策偏差。结果表明,供应链可以通过退货政策实现渠道协调,退货价格随着零售商的反浪费偏好的增加而增加,随着零售商的反缺货偏好的增加而降低。并通过数值算例证明了回归策略的期望利润和效用大于分散决策系统的期望利润和效用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Modeling for Return Policy with Retailer's Combined Decision Bias
This paper considers a supply chain model in which a single supplier sells a single product to a single retailer who faces the newsvendor problem. The retailer has combined decision bias. The results show that the supply chain can achieve channel coordination with return policy, the return price increases as the retailerpsilas waste-averse preferences increases and decreases as stockout-averse preferences increases. And we demonstrate that the expected profit and utility of return policy are more than that of the decentralized decision making system by using numerical examples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信