{"title":"SERVQUAL","authors":"Marijn Mulders","doi":"10.4324/9781003022022-83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Quality is defined based on the recipient's request. Students are the main members of the higher educational system. The aim of this study was to investigate the items related to the quality of services from the students’ point. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in six faculties of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2015-2016. Five hundred and seven undergraduate students were enrolled by multi-stage random sampling method. The standard SERVQUAL questionnaire with 27 pairs of questions which evaluate the quality of educational servies, was distributed. SPSS version 24 was used for data analysis. Results: Overall, 303 individuals (60%) were female and another 60% were in basic science period. There was a negative gap in all items in all the faculties. The item related to \"the appealing appearance of the employees\" had the smallest gap (from -0.6 to -0.1). The greatest gaps were related to the following items: in the medical(-1.7±0.1) and health (-1.8±0.2) faculties, \"preparing students for future jobs by providing necessary theoretical and practical trainings\"; in the faculty of dentistry(-2.0±0.1), \"staff flexibility in specific conditions\"; in the faculties of pharmacy(-1.5±0.1) and nursing(-1.2±0.1) \"room and environmental facilities\"; in the faculty of paramedicine(-1.5±0.1), \"possibility for students to comment on educational programs\" and \"appropriate time for conducting classes\". Conclusion: Items with highest gaps were not similar among different faculties. Focusing on the identified items with the greatest negative gaps is highly recommended. Students’ Expressed","PeriodicalId":261655,"journal":{"name":"101 Management Models","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"130","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"SERVQUAL\",\"authors\":\"Marijn Mulders\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003022022-83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Quality is defined based on the recipient's request. Students are the main members of the higher educational system. The aim of this study was to investigate the items related to the quality of services from the students’ point. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in six faculties of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2015-2016. Five hundred and seven undergraduate students were enrolled by multi-stage random sampling method. The standard SERVQUAL questionnaire with 27 pairs of questions which evaluate the quality of educational servies, was distributed. SPSS version 24 was used for data analysis. Results: Overall, 303 individuals (60%) were female and another 60% were in basic science period. There was a negative gap in all items in all the faculties. The item related to \\\"the appealing appearance of the employees\\\" had the smallest gap (from -0.6 to -0.1). The greatest gaps were related to the following items: in the medical(-1.7±0.1) and health (-1.8±0.2) faculties, \\\"preparing students for future jobs by providing necessary theoretical and practical trainings\\\"; in the faculty of dentistry(-2.0±0.1), \\\"staff flexibility in specific conditions\\\"; in the faculties of pharmacy(-1.5±0.1) and nursing(-1.2±0.1) \\\"room and environmental facilities\\\"; in the faculty of paramedicine(-1.5±0.1), \\\"possibility for students to comment on educational programs\\\" and \\\"appropriate time for conducting classes\\\". Conclusion: Items with highest gaps were not similar among different faculties. Focusing on the identified items with the greatest negative gaps is highly recommended. Students’ Expressed\",\"PeriodicalId\":261655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"101 Management Models\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"130\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"101 Management Models\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022022-83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"101 Management Models","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003022022-83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 130
摘要
导读:质量是根据收件人的要求来定义的。学生是高等教育系统的主要成员。本研究的目的是从学生的角度调查与服务质量有关的项目。方法:本横断面研究于2015-2016年在马什哈德医科大学6个院系进行。采用多阶段随机抽样法,对570名本科生进行了调查。分发了标准的SERVQUAL问卷,其中有27对问题,用于评估教育服务的质量。使用SPSS version 24进行数据分析。结果:303人(60%)为女性,60%为基础科学期。所有院系的所有项目都出现了负差距。与“员工的外表吸引力”相关的项目差距最小(从-0.6到-0.1)。差距最大的是以下项目:在医学系(-1.7±0.1)和卫生系(-1.8±0.2),“通过提供必要的理论和实践培训,为学生将来的工作做好准备”;在牙科学院(-2.0±0.1),“员工在特定条件下的灵活性”;药学院(-1.5±0.1)、护理学院(-1.2±0.1)“房间及环境设施”;在辅助医学系(-1.5±0.1),“学生对教育计划的评论可能性”和“上课的适当时间”。结论:不同院系间差异最大的项目并不相似。强烈建议将重点放在负面差距最大的已确定项目上。学生的表达
Introduction: Quality is defined based on the recipient's request. Students are the main members of the higher educational system. The aim of this study was to investigate the items related to the quality of services from the students’ point. Methods: This cross-sectional study was carried out in six faculties of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences in 2015-2016. Five hundred and seven undergraduate students were enrolled by multi-stage random sampling method. The standard SERVQUAL questionnaire with 27 pairs of questions which evaluate the quality of educational servies, was distributed. SPSS version 24 was used for data analysis. Results: Overall, 303 individuals (60%) were female and another 60% were in basic science period. There was a negative gap in all items in all the faculties. The item related to "the appealing appearance of the employees" had the smallest gap (from -0.6 to -0.1). The greatest gaps were related to the following items: in the medical(-1.7±0.1) and health (-1.8±0.2) faculties, "preparing students for future jobs by providing necessary theoretical and practical trainings"; in the faculty of dentistry(-2.0±0.1), "staff flexibility in specific conditions"; in the faculties of pharmacy(-1.5±0.1) and nursing(-1.2±0.1) "room and environmental facilities"; in the faculty of paramedicine(-1.5±0.1), "possibility for students to comment on educational programs" and "appropriate time for conducting classes". Conclusion: Items with highest gaps were not similar among different faculties. Focusing on the identified items with the greatest negative gaps is highly recommended. Students’ Expressed