超越基本事实:文件二值化的可选质量度量

2016 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR) Pub Date : 2016-10-01 DOI:10.1109/ICFHR.2016.0097

Arie Shaus, B. Sober, Eli Turkel, E. Piasetzky

{"title":"超越基本事实:文件二值化的可选质量度量","authors":"Arie Shaus, B. Sober, Eli Turkel, E. Piasetzky","doi":"10.1109/ICFHR.2016.0097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the quality assessment of binary images. The customary, ground truth based methodology, used in the literature is shown to be problematic due to its subjective nature. Several previously suggested alternatives are surveyed and are also found to be inadequate in certain scenarios. A new approach, quantifying the adherence of a binarization to its document image is proposed and tested using six different measures of accuracy. The measures are evaluated experimentally based on datasets from DIBCO and H-DIBCO competitions, with respect to different kinds of binarization degradations.","PeriodicalId":194844,"journal":{"name":"2016 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR)","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond the Ground Truth: Alternative Quality Measures of Document Binarizations\",\"authors\":\"Arie Shaus, B. Sober, Eli Turkel, E. Piasetzky\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICFHR.2016.0097\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the quality assessment of binary images. The customary, ground truth based methodology, used in the literature is shown to be problematic due to its subjective nature. Several previously suggested alternatives are surveyed and are also found to be inadequate in certain scenarios. A new approach, quantifying the adherence of a binarization to its document image is proposed and tested using six different measures of accuracy. The measures are evaluated experimentally based on datasets from DIBCO and H-DIBCO competitions, with respect to different kinds of binarization degradations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":194844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2016 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2016 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2016.0097\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2016 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFHR.2016.0097","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 4

摘要

本文讨论了二值图像的质量评价。在文献中使用的习惯的、基于事实的方法论由于其主观性而被证明是有问题的。对以前提出的几种备选办法进行了调查，也发现在某些情况下是不适当的。提出了一种新的方法，量化二值化对其文档图像的依从性，并使用六种不同的精度措施进行了测试。基于DIBCO和H-DIBCO比赛的数据集，对不同类型的二值化退化进行了实验评估。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Beyond the Ground Truth: Alternative Quality Measures of Document Binarizations

This article discusses the quality assessment of binary images. The customary, ground truth based methodology, used in the literature is shown to be problematic due to its subjective nature. Several previously suggested alternatives are surveyed and are also found to be inadequate in certain scenarios. A new approach, quantifying the adherence of a binarization to its document image is proposed and tested using six different measures of accuracy. The measures are evaluated experimentally based on datasets from DIBCO and H-DIBCO competitions, with respect to different kinds of binarization degradations.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

2016 15th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition (ICFHR)

自引率

0.00%

发文量