Brian JM Quinn, Nioufar Abae, Alex Peña
{"title":"Amicus Brief: Koshy v. Sachdev, MA SJC","authors":"Brian JM Quinn, Nioufar Abae, Alex Peña","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3440721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Question presented: under what circumstances a judge may order the dissolution of a corporation on the ground that a deadlock exists and that irreparable injury to the corporation is threatened or being suffered; what constitutes a deadlock within the meaning of G. L. c. 156D, § 14.30 (2). The Amici write to call the Court’s attention to a very recent decision of Delaware’s highest court addressing similar issues under a Delaware judicial dissolution statute that is comparable in many respects to G. L. c. 156D, § 14.30 (2).","PeriodicalId":309706,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Governance Law & Arrangements by Subject Matter (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提出的问题:在什么情况下,法官可以以存在僵局和对公司造成无法弥补的损害的威胁或正在遭受损害为由,命令解散公司;在《美国法典》第156D条第14.30(2)段的意义上,构成僵局的因素是什么?“之友”致函提请法院注意特拉华州最高法院最近的一项裁决,该裁决根据特拉华州司法解散法规解决了类似问题,该法规在许多方面与《美国法典》第156D条第14.30(2)段相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amicus Brief: Koshy v. Sachdev, MA SJC
Question presented: under what circumstances a judge may order the dissolution of a corporation on the ground that a deadlock exists and that irreparable injury to the corporation is threatened or being suffered; what constitutes a deadlock within the meaning of G. L. c. 156D, § 14.30 (2). The Amici write to call the Court’s attention to a very recent decision of Delaware’s highest court addressing similar issues under a Delaware judicial dissolution statute that is comparable in many respects to G. L. c. 156D, § 14.30 (2).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信