{"title":"谁属于大学?","authors":"Stephen Schryer","doi":"10.11126/STANFORD/9781503603677.003.0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter focuses on Philip Roth’s late 1990s novel, The Human Stain, arguing that the novel draws an analogy between the university and the Democratic Party. In early War on Poverty–era novels like Portnoy’s Complaint, Roth developed an antiprocess conception of art and welfare politics, one that conceived of works of art and public institutions as products that require audiences to appreciate them on their own terms. In The Human Stain, Roth extends this conception to the postmodern academy, using it to criticize multicultural education and affirmative action. Linking the university and New Deal liberal coalition, Roth insists that both are under assault by cultural and ideological outsiders. This analogy leads Roth to embrace a strategic conservatism, one that echoes the politics of Bill Clinton, whose impeachment trial recurs throughout The Human Stain.","PeriodicalId":166106,"journal":{"name":"Maximum Feasible Participation","volume":"310 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who Belongs in the University?\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Schryer\",\"doi\":\"10.11126/STANFORD/9781503603677.003.0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter focuses on Philip Roth’s late 1990s novel, The Human Stain, arguing that the novel draws an analogy between the university and the Democratic Party. In early War on Poverty–era novels like Portnoy’s Complaint, Roth developed an antiprocess conception of art and welfare politics, one that conceived of works of art and public institutions as products that require audiences to appreciate them on their own terms. In The Human Stain, Roth extends this conception to the postmodern academy, using it to criticize multicultural education and affirmative action. Linking the university and New Deal liberal coalition, Roth insists that both are under assault by cultural and ideological outsiders. This analogy leads Roth to embrace a strategic conservatism, one that echoes the politics of Bill Clinton, whose impeachment trial recurs throughout The Human Stain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":166106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maximum Feasible Participation\",\"volume\":\"310 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maximum Feasible Participation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.11126/STANFORD/9781503603677.003.0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maximum Feasible Participation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11126/STANFORD/9781503603677.003.0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本章主要关注菲利普·罗斯(Philip Roth)在上世纪90年代末的小说《人性的污点》(The Human Stain),认为这部小说将大学与民主党进行了类比。在《向贫困宣战》(War on poverty)时代的早期小说中,比如波特诺伊的《抱怨》(Complaint),罗斯提出了一种艺术和福利政治的反过程概念,他认为艺术作品和公共机构是需要观众以自己的方式欣赏的产品。在《人性的污点》中,罗斯将这一概念扩展到后现代学院,用它来批判多元文化教育和平权行动。罗斯将大学和新政自由主义联盟联系起来,坚称两者都受到文化和意识形态局外人的攻击。这种类比使罗斯接受了一种战略保守主义,这种保守主义与比尔·克林顿(Bill Clinton)的政治相呼应,他的弹劾审判在《人类的污点》(Human Stain)中反复出现。
This chapter focuses on Philip Roth’s late 1990s novel, The Human Stain, arguing that the novel draws an analogy between the university and the Democratic Party. In early War on Poverty–era novels like Portnoy’s Complaint, Roth developed an antiprocess conception of art and welfare politics, one that conceived of works of art and public institutions as products that require audiences to appreciate them on their own terms. In The Human Stain, Roth extends this conception to the postmodern academy, using it to criticize multicultural education and affirmative action. Linking the university and New Deal liberal coalition, Roth insists that both are under assault by cultural and ideological outsiders. This analogy leads Roth to embrace a strategic conservatism, one that echoes the politics of Bill Clinton, whose impeachment trial recurs throughout The Human Stain.