导论:履行共同责任:教育探究的包容性方法论

N. Gough
{"title":"导论:履行共同责任:教育探究的包容性方法论","authors":"N. Gough","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2003.9558588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Let me say from the outset that the following articles really need no introduction, and that their authors certainly do not need my patronage (or anyone else's) to legitimate their work. Nevertheless, I very much enjoyed the presentation of four of these articles in their earlier versions (at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education held in Fremantle in December 2001) and the authors have persuaded me that introducing their articles and making some connections between them might serve some useful purpose. I admit that much of my enthusiasm for these articles is unabashedly self-interested. Four of them those by Jan Edwards, Valerie Harwood, Margaret Kumar and Mary Lou Rasmussen were invaluable in helping me to understand and address a pressing practical problem in 2001, as I will explain in more detail below. I read the fifth article by Anna Hickey-Moody only a few weeks before writing this introduction, but it has proved to be no less useful in informing the same practical problem, as well as a more recent research interest. Each of these articles responds critically and creatively to the challenges of performing and representing inclusive methodologies in educational research. For much of my career as an educational researcher and teacher of research methodology studies, I thought I 'knew* how difficult these challenges were. Like many of my colleagues, I have struggled with the ontological, epistemological, methodological and axiological complexities of reading, representing and narrating difference without fearing or fetishising it, and of performing modes of inquiry that respond constructively to the effects of difFerence in mediating educational change. But I have become more aware of the limits of my understandings in recent years, especially since 1998 when I began to participate in a number of research and teaching activities in southern Africa. These literal (if occasional) shifts in location have helped to shape my enthusiasm for the articles in this issue.","PeriodicalId":347655,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Studies in Education","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introduction: Performing shared responsibilities: Inclusive methodologies for educational inquiry\",\"authors\":\"N. Gough\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17508487.2003.9558588\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Let me say from the outset that the following articles really need no introduction, and that their authors certainly do not need my patronage (or anyone else's) to legitimate their work. Nevertheless, I very much enjoyed the presentation of four of these articles in their earlier versions (at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education held in Fremantle in December 2001) and the authors have persuaded me that introducing their articles and making some connections between them might serve some useful purpose. I admit that much of my enthusiasm for these articles is unabashedly self-interested. Four of them those by Jan Edwards, Valerie Harwood, Margaret Kumar and Mary Lou Rasmussen were invaluable in helping me to understand and address a pressing practical problem in 2001, as I will explain in more detail below. I read the fifth article by Anna Hickey-Moody only a few weeks before writing this introduction, but it has proved to be no less useful in informing the same practical problem, as well as a more recent research interest. Each of these articles responds critically and creatively to the challenges of performing and representing inclusive methodologies in educational research. For much of my career as an educational researcher and teacher of research methodology studies, I thought I 'knew* how difficult these challenges were. Like many of my colleagues, I have struggled with the ontological, epistemological, methodological and axiological complexities of reading, representing and narrating difference without fearing or fetishising it, and of performing modes of inquiry that respond constructively to the effects of difFerence in mediating educational change. But I have become more aware of the limits of my understandings in recent years, especially since 1998 when I began to participate in a number of research and teaching activities in southern Africa. These literal (if occasional) shifts in location have helped to shape my enthusiasm for the articles in this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347655,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melbourne Studies in Education\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melbourne Studies in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2003.9558588\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2003.9558588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

让我从一开始就说,下面的文章确实不需要介绍,它们的作者当然不需要我(或其他任何人)的赞助来证明他们的工作是合法的。尽管如此,我还是非常喜欢其中四篇文章的早期版本(2001年12月在弗里曼特尔举行的澳大利亚教育研究协会年会上),作者说服我介绍他们的文章并在它们之间建立一些联系可能会有一些有用的目的。我承认,我对这些文章的热情在很大程度上是出于毫不掩饰的自我利益。其中四篇是由简·爱德华兹、瓦莱丽·哈伍德、玛格丽特·库马尔和玛丽·卢·拉斯穆森撰写的,它们在帮助我理解和解决2001年一个紧迫的实际问题方面发挥了无价的作用,我将在下面更详细地解释。就在写这篇介绍的几周前,我读了安娜·希基-穆迪(Anna Hickey-Moody)的第五篇文章,但事实证明,它在阐述同样的实际问题以及一个更近期的研究兴趣方面同样有用。这些文章中的每一篇都批判性地和创造性地回应了在教育研究中执行和代表包容性方法的挑战。在我作为一名教育研究者和研究方法论教师的大部分职业生涯中,我认为我“知道”这些挑战有多困难。像我的许多同事一样,我一直在努力解决阅读的本体论、认识论、方法论和价值论的复杂性,在不害怕或崇拜差异的情况下代表和叙述差异,以及在调解教育变革中对差异的影响做出建设性回应的调查模式。但近年来,尤其是1998年我开始在非洲南部参加一些研究和教学活动后,我越来越意识到自己认识的局限性。这些字面上(偶尔)的位置变化有助于塑造我对本期文章的热情。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introduction: Performing shared responsibilities: Inclusive methodologies for educational inquiry
Let me say from the outset that the following articles really need no introduction, and that their authors certainly do not need my patronage (or anyone else's) to legitimate their work. Nevertheless, I very much enjoyed the presentation of four of these articles in their earlier versions (at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education held in Fremantle in December 2001) and the authors have persuaded me that introducing their articles and making some connections between them might serve some useful purpose. I admit that much of my enthusiasm for these articles is unabashedly self-interested. Four of them those by Jan Edwards, Valerie Harwood, Margaret Kumar and Mary Lou Rasmussen were invaluable in helping me to understand and address a pressing practical problem in 2001, as I will explain in more detail below. I read the fifth article by Anna Hickey-Moody only a few weeks before writing this introduction, but it has proved to be no less useful in informing the same practical problem, as well as a more recent research interest. Each of these articles responds critically and creatively to the challenges of performing and representing inclusive methodologies in educational research. For much of my career as an educational researcher and teacher of research methodology studies, I thought I 'knew* how difficult these challenges were. Like many of my colleagues, I have struggled with the ontological, epistemological, methodological and axiological complexities of reading, representing and narrating difference without fearing or fetishising it, and of performing modes of inquiry that respond constructively to the effects of difFerence in mediating educational change. But I have become more aware of the limits of my understandings in recent years, especially since 1998 when I began to participate in a number of research and teaching activities in southern Africa. These literal (if occasional) shifts in location have helped to shape my enthusiasm for the articles in this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信