书评:保罗·r·欣利奇的《路德神学:批判性介绍》

Carl E. Braaten
{"title":"书评:保罗·r·欣利奇的《路德神学:批判性介绍》","authors":"Carl E. Braaten","doi":"10.1177/10638512221076303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This brief volume tells the story of half a millennium of the Lutheran theological tradition from its origin in Luther’s initial call for reform to its present global condition of conflict and confusion. I cannot think of anyone better equipped to tell this sorry tale than Paul Hinlicky, no stranger to conflict and controversy himself. This book is a concise digest of things he was written about Luther and Lutheran theology over many years in weighty tomes and learned articles. Hinlicky concludes his book with “A Brief Prolegomena to Any Future Lutheran Theology,” informing his readers on where he stands in the midst of the “contested contemporary world of Lutheran theology.” As Hinlicky surveys world Lutheranism he observes a decadent and dying post-Christendom Lutheranism in Eastern and Western Europe, he sees the younger churches planted by the nineteenth-century missionary movement developing indigenous theologies of their own, he sees American Lutheranism divided between pseudo-orthodox evangelical fundamentalism and ecumenically oriented evangelical Catholicism, and both of them being challenged by a resurgence of liberal Lutheranism blending with various liberationist and feminist theologies. What Hinlicky proposes as a more promising alternative emerges from his narrative of the successive types of Lutheranism, starting with Luther’s own multiple, self-contradictory theological positions, followed first by the period of confessional Lutheranism culminating in the Formula of Concord, next by seventeenth-century scholastic orthodoxy which, contrary to Luther, put Aristotle back into the driver’s seat, then the rise of Pietism, critical of “dead orthodoxy,” led by the fervent devotional writings of Johann Arndt, Philip Jacob Spener, and August Hermann Francke. Both Lutheran Orthodoxy and Pietism came tumbling down with the relentless rationalistic critique of traditional Christian dogmatics by the leading philosopher of the Enlightenment, Immanuel Kant. Kant’s critiques of pure and practical reason opened the Book Review","PeriodicalId":223812,"journal":{"name":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Lutheran Theology: A Critical Introduction by Paul R. Hinlicky\",\"authors\":\"Carl E. Braaten\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10638512221076303\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This brief volume tells the story of half a millennium of the Lutheran theological tradition from its origin in Luther’s initial call for reform to its present global condition of conflict and confusion. I cannot think of anyone better equipped to tell this sorry tale than Paul Hinlicky, no stranger to conflict and controversy himself. This book is a concise digest of things he was written about Luther and Lutheran theology over many years in weighty tomes and learned articles. Hinlicky concludes his book with “A Brief Prolegomena to Any Future Lutheran Theology,” informing his readers on where he stands in the midst of the “contested contemporary world of Lutheran theology.” As Hinlicky surveys world Lutheranism he observes a decadent and dying post-Christendom Lutheranism in Eastern and Western Europe, he sees the younger churches planted by the nineteenth-century missionary movement developing indigenous theologies of their own, he sees American Lutheranism divided between pseudo-orthodox evangelical fundamentalism and ecumenically oriented evangelical Catholicism, and both of them being challenged by a resurgence of liberal Lutheranism blending with various liberationist and feminist theologies. What Hinlicky proposes as a more promising alternative emerges from his narrative of the successive types of Lutheranism, starting with Luther’s own multiple, self-contradictory theological positions, followed first by the period of confessional Lutheranism culminating in the Formula of Concord, next by seventeenth-century scholastic orthodoxy which, contrary to Luther, put Aristotle back into the driver’s seat, then the rise of Pietism, critical of “dead orthodoxy,” led by the fervent devotional writings of Johann Arndt, Philip Jacob Spener, and August Hermann Francke. Both Lutheran Orthodoxy and Pietism came tumbling down with the relentless rationalistic critique of traditional Christian dogmatics by the leading philosopher of the Enlightenment, Immanuel Kant. Kant’s critiques of pure and practical reason opened the Book Review\",\"PeriodicalId\":223812,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512221076303\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10638512221076303","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这本简短的书讲述了半个世纪的路德神学传统的故事,从路德最初呼吁改革的起源到目前冲突和混乱的全球状况。我想不出还有谁比保罗·欣利奇更适合讲述这个令人遗憾的故事了,他本人对冲突和争议并不陌生。这本书是他多年来写的关于路德和路德神学的东西的简明摘要。Hinlicky以“对未来路德神学的简短序言”来结束他的书,告诉他的读者他在“当代路德神学充满争议的世界”中所处的位置。当Hinlicky调查世界路德教时他观察到东欧和西欧的颓废和垂死的后基督教路德教,他看到19世纪传教运动建立的年轻教会发展了自己的本土神学,他看到美国路德教分为伪正统的福音派原教旨主义和以普世为导向的福音派天主教,他们都受到了自由路德教与各种自由主义和女权主义神学融合的挑战。欣利克提出了一个更有希望的替代方案,从他对路德教的连续类型的叙述中出现,从路德自己的多重,自相矛盾的神学立场开始,首先是认信路德教的时期,以康科德公式为高潮,然后是17世纪的经院正教,与路德相反,把亚里士多德放回了主导地位,然后是虔诚派的兴起,批判“死正统”以约翰·阿恩特、菲利普·雅各布·斯宾纳和奥古斯特·赫尔曼·弗兰克等人的狂热虔诚的著作为主导。随着启蒙运动的主要哲学家伊曼努尔·康德对传统基督教教条无情的理性主义批判,路德正教和虔诚派都垮台了。康德对纯粹理性和实践理性的批判开启了《书评》
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Lutheran Theology: A Critical Introduction by Paul R. Hinlicky
This brief volume tells the story of half a millennium of the Lutheran theological tradition from its origin in Luther’s initial call for reform to its present global condition of conflict and confusion. I cannot think of anyone better equipped to tell this sorry tale than Paul Hinlicky, no stranger to conflict and controversy himself. This book is a concise digest of things he was written about Luther and Lutheran theology over many years in weighty tomes and learned articles. Hinlicky concludes his book with “A Brief Prolegomena to Any Future Lutheran Theology,” informing his readers on where he stands in the midst of the “contested contemporary world of Lutheran theology.” As Hinlicky surveys world Lutheranism he observes a decadent and dying post-Christendom Lutheranism in Eastern and Western Europe, he sees the younger churches planted by the nineteenth-century missionary movement developing indigenous theologies of their own, he sees American Lutheranism divided between pseudo-orthodox evangelical fundamentalism and ecumenically oriented evangelical Catholicism, and both of them being challenged by a resurgence of liberal Lutheranism blending with various liberationist and feminist theologies. What Hinlicky proposes as a more promising alternative emerges from his narrative of the successive types of Lutheranism, starting with Luther’s own multiple, self-contradictory theological positions, followed first by the period of confessional Lutheranism culminating in the Formula of Concord, next by seventeenth-century scholastic orthodoxy which, contrary to Luther, put Aristotle back into the driver’s seat, then the rise of Pietism, critical of “dead orthodoxy,” led by the fervent devotional writings of Johann Arndt, Philip Jacob Spener, and August Hermann Francke. Both Lutheran Orthodoxy and Pietism came tumbling down with the relentless rationalistic critique of traditional Christian dogmatics by the leading philosopher of the Enlightenment, Immanuel Kant. Kant’s critiques of pure and practical reason opened the Book Review
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信