Graziella Pelegrini, G. B. Só, M. Alcalde, R. Vivan, M. Duarte, F. Barletta
{"title":"滑行道旋转仪表抗扭性能评价","authors":"Graziella Pelegrini, G. B. Só, M. Alcalde, R. Vivan, M. Duarte, F. Barletta","doi":"10.59306/jrd.v11e120237-13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"NiTi endodontic instruments for glide path are the most susceptible to fractures inside the root canal, mainly as a result of high torsional stress. Objective: The present study investigated the resistance to torsion and angular deflection of instruments destined for the glide path: ProGlider #16.02; T-File #17.02 and the MK Life #16.02. Materials and methods: Thirty rotating NiTi glide path instruments (n=10) with 25mm lengths were selected. The torsion test was performed based on ISO 3630-01 (1992). Three millimeters from the tip of the instruments, it was attached to a small load cell by a lever arm connected to the torsion shaft. Torsional strength and angular deflection were evaluated. Fracture surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy with magnifications of 1000x and 5000x in the cross section, and 50x in the lateral section. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by the Down's post hoc test. Results: The ProGlider instrument showed greater torsional strength (p<0.05) compared to the T-File (p<0.05) and MK Life (p<0.05), respectively. However, the T-File showed greater angular deflection (p<0.05) than the other groups tested. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the ProGlider instrument presented greater torque for the fracture, while the T-File instrument presented greater angular deflection. \n \n ","PeriodicalId":213881,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","volume":"177 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ASSESSMENT OF TORSION RESISTANCE OF GLIDE PATH ROTARY INSTRUMENTS\",\"authors\":\"Graziella Pelegrini, G. B. Só, M. Alcalde, R. Vivan, M. Duarte, F. Barletta\",\"doi\":\"10.59306/jrd.v11e120237-13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"NiTi endodontic instruments for glide path are the most susceptible to fractures inside the root canal, mainly as a result of high torsional stress. Objective: The present study investigated the resistance to torsion and angular deflection of instruments destined for the glide path: ProGlider #16.02; T-File #17.02 and the MK Life #16.02. Materials and methods: Thirty rotating NiTi glide path instruments (n=10) with 25mm lengths were selected. The torsion test was performed based on ISO 3630-01 (1992). Three millimeters from the tip of the instruments, it was attached to a small load cell by a lever arm connected to the torsion shaft. Torsional strength and angular deflection were evaluated. Fracture surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy with magnifications of 1000x and 5000x in the cross section, and 50x in the lateral section. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by the Down's post hoc test. Results: The ProGlider instrument showed greater torsional strength (p<0.05) compared to the T-File (p<0.05) and MK Life (p<0.05), respectively. However, the T-File showed greater angular deflection (p<0.05) than the other groups tested. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the ProGlider instrument presented greater torque for the fracture, while the T-File instrument presented greater angular deflection. \\n \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":213881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Dentistry\",\"volume\":\"177 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.59306/jrd.v11e120237-13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.59306/jrd.v11e120237-13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
用于滑动路径的镍钛根管器械最容易发生根管内骨折,主要是由于高扭转应力。目的:研究用于滑翔路径的仪器ProGlider #16.02对扭转和角偏转的阻力;T-File #17.02和MK Life #16.02。材料与方法:选择长度为25mm的旋转NiTi滑道仪30台(n=10)。扭转试验依据ISO 3630-01(1992)进行。在距离仪器尖端3毫米的地方,它通过与扭力轴相连的杠杆臂连接到一个小型称重传感器上。扭强度和角挠度进行了评估。用扫描电子显微镜观察断口表面,横截面放大1000倍、5000x倍,横截面放大50倍。采用Kruskal-Wallis H检验进行统计分析,然后进行Down’s事后检验。结果:ProGlider仪器的抗扭强度分别高于T-File (p<0.05)和MK Life (p<0.05)。但T-File组的角度偏斜明显大于其他组(p<0.05)。结论:ProGlider仪对骨折的扭矩更大,而T-File仪的角度挠度更大。
ASSESSMENT OF TORSION RESISTANCE OF GLIDE PATH ROTARY INSTRUMENTS
NiTi endodontic instruments for glide path are the most susceptible to fractures inside the root canal, mainly as a result of high torsional stress. Objective: The present study investigated the resistance to torsion and angular deflection of instruments destined for the glide path: ProGlider #16.02; T-File #17.02 and the MK Life #16.02. Materials and methods: Thirty rotating NiTi glide path instruments (n=10) with 25mm lengths were selected. The torsion test was performed based on ISO 3630-01 (1992). Three millimeters from the tip of the instruments, it was attached to a small load cell by a lever arm connected to the torsion shaft. Torsional strength and angular deflection were evaluated. Fracture surfaces were examined by scanning electron microscopy with magnifications of 1000x and 5000x in the cross section, and 50x in the lateral section. Statistical analysis was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis H test, followed by the Down's post hoc test. Results: The ProGlider instrument showed greater torsional strength (p<0.05) compared to the T-File (p<0.05) and MK Life (p<0.05), respectively. However, the T-File showed greater angular deflection (p<0.05) than the other groups tested. Conclusion: It can be concluded that the ProGlider instrument presented greater torque for the fracture, while the T-File instrument presented greater angular deflection.