信托法律

W. Wendel
{"title":"信托法律","authors":"W. Wendel","doi":"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter assesses fiduciary law within the framework of private law theory. Fiduciary law and private law theory seem made for one another. Fiduciary law is centrally focused on the morally attractive end of maintaining relationships of trust and confidence among individuals. But it does so by bracketing highly abstract normative theory in favor of well-developed legal constructs such as duties of loyalty and care. It is comfortable with pluralism, complexity, and context-specificity. Moreover, it represents a rational structure that is not wholly dependent on external criteria yet does not aspire to strict independence from empirical considerations and normative values. Fiduciary law nevertheless poses some challenges for private law theory. As an evolving field, it may grow in unanticipated directions and risk the loss of its former coherence. The possibility of this loss of a coherent organizing structure has motivated considerable recent work in the theory of fiduciary law, and also in legal theory more generally, as scholars seek to understand how normative pluralism can coexist with stable, rational legal doctrine.","PeriodicalId":337737,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law","volume":"197 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fiduciary Law\",\"authors\":\"W. Wendel\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter assesses fiduciary law within the framework of private law theory. Fiduciary law and private law theory seem made for one another. Fiduciary law is centrally focused on the morally attractive end of maintaining relationships of trust and confidence among individuals. But it does so by bracketing highly abstract normative theory in favor of well-developed legal constructs such as duties of loyalty and care. It is comfortable with pluralism, complexity, and context-specificity. Moreover, it represents a rational structure that is not wholly dependent on external criteria yet does not aspire to strict independence from empirical considerations and normative values. Fiduciary law nevertheless poses some challenges for private law theory. As an evolving field, it may grow in unanticipated directions and risk the loss of its former coherence. The possibility of this loss of a coherent organizing structure has motivated considerable recent work in the theory of fiduciary law, and also in legal theory more generally, as scholars seek to understand how normative pluralism can coexist with stable, rational legal doctrine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":337737,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law\",\"volume\":\"197 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of the New Private Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190919665.013.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章在私法理论的框架内对信托法进行评估。信托法和私法理论似乎是天生一对。信托法主要关注维持个人之间的信任和信心关系的道德吸引力。但它是通过将高度抽象的规范理论纳入到完善的法律结构中来实现的,比如忠诚义务和照顾义务。它对多元性、复杂性和情境特异性感到满意。此外,它代表了一种理性结构,这种结构不完全依赖于外部标准,但也不渴望严格独立于经验考虑和规范价值。信托法对私法理论提出了一些挑战。作为一个不断发展的领域,它可能会朝着意想不到的方向发展,并冒着失去原有连贯性的风险。由于学者们试图理解规范多元主义如何与稳定、理性的法律学说共存,这种连贯的组织结构丧失的可能性促使了信托法理论以及更广泛的法律理论方面的大量近期工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fiduciary Law
This chapter assesses fiduciary law within the framework of private law theory. Fiduciary law and private law theory seem made for one another. Fiduciary law is centrally focused on the morally attractive end of maintaining relationships of trust and confidence among individuals. But it does so by bracketing highly abstract normative theory in favor of well-developed legal constructs such as duties of loyalty and care. It is comfortable with pluralism, complexity, and context-specificity. Moreover, it represents a rational structure that is not wholly dependent on external criteria yet does not aspire to strict independence from empirical considerations and normative values. Fiduciary law nevertheless poses some challenges for private law theory. As an evolving field, it may grow in unanticipated directions and risk the loss of its former coherence. The possibility of this loss of a coherent organizing structure has motivated considerable recent work in the theory of fiduciary law, and also in legal theory more generally, as scholars seek to understand how normative pluralism can coexist with stable, rational legal doctrine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信