以色列国宪法;文明国家的比较

Mark Goldfeder
{"title":"以色列国宪法;文明国家的比较","authors":"Mark Goldfeder","doi":"10.58948/2331-3536.1328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The art of constitution-making is never one-dimensional. In regard to the United States’ model, it has recently been argued that “[d]espite the enormous literature on the critical period, including the foreign affairs imperatives behind the movement for reform, it is not fully understood that the animus behind the reform effort that culminated in the new Constitution was a desire to ensure that the United States would be in a position to meet its international commitments and thereby earn international recognition.”1 While there are obvious differences, and while this concept is perhaps of even greater importance and more poignantly felt for a nation that has so long been plagued with issues of de facto and de jure recognition, many of the same factors that would make it incomplete to view the purpose of the American Constitution as a strictly internal document hold true for our strongest ally in the Middle East. After the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the young country experienced diplomatic isolation and Arab League boycotts. Today, Israel has diplomatic ties with 154 out of the other 191 member states of the United Nations, as well as with non-member Vatican City. This paper argues that the  Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of Law; SJD Candidate in Law and Religion at Emory University, alumnus of the Wexner Graduate Fellowship (Rabbinate, Yeshiva University). Served on the rabbinic staff at Mt Sinai Jewish Center in Washington Heights and the Beth Din of America in New York City; J.D., New York University School of Law, LLM, Emory University School of Law. 1 David M. Golove & Daniel J. Hulsebosch, A Civilized Nation: The Early American Constitution, the Law of Nations, and the Pursuit of International Recognition 116 (N.Y.U. Pub. Law & Legal Theory Working Papers, Paper No. 222), available at http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/222.","PeriodicalId":340850,"journal":{"name":"Pace International Law Review","volume":"94 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The State of Israel's Constitution; A Comparison of Civilized Nations\",\"authors\":\"Mark Goldfeder\",\"doi\":\"10.58948/2331-3536.1328\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The art of constitution-making is never one-dimensional. In regard to the United States’ model, it has recently been argued that “[d]espite the enormous literature on the critical period, including the foreign affairs imperatives behind the movement for reform, it is not fully understood that the animus behind the reform effort that culminated in the new Constitution was a desire to ensure that the United States would be in a position to meet its international commitments and thereby earn international recognition.”1 While there are obvious differences, and while this concept is perhaps of even greater importance and more poignantly felt for a nation that has so long been plagued with issues of de facto and de jure recognition, many of the same factors that would make it incomplete to view the purpose of the American Constitution as a strictly internal document hold true for our strongest ally in the Middle East. After the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the young country experienced diplomatic isolation and Arab League boycotts. Today, Israel has diplomatic ties with 154 out of the other 191 member states of the United Nations, as well as with non-member Vatican City. This paper argues that the  Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of Law; SJD Candidate in Law and Religion at Emory University, alumnus of the Wexner Graduate Fellowship (Rabbinate, Yeshiva University). Served on the rabbinic staff at Mt Sinai Jewish Center in Washington Heights and the Beth Din of America in New York City; J.D., New York University School of Law, LLM, Emory University School of Law. 1 David M. Golove & Daniel J. Hulsebosch, A Civilized Nation: The Early American Constitution, the Law of Nations, and the Pursuit of International Recognition 116 (N.Y.U. Pub. Law & Legal Theory Working Papers, Paper No. 222), available at http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/222.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340850,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pace International Law Review\",\"volume\":\"94 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pace International Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3536.1328\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pace International Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58948/2331-3536.1328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

制宪的艺术从来不是单向度的。关于美国的模式,最近有人认为,“尽管有大量关于关键时期的文献,包括改革运动背后的外交事务必要性,但人们并没有完全理解,在新宪法中达到高潮的改革努力背后的敌意是确保美国能够履行其国际承诺,从而获得国际承认的愿望。”尽管存在着明显的差异,而且对于一个长期被事实和法律上的承认问题所困扰的国家来说,这一概念可能更为重要,也更为深刻,但是,将美国宪法的目的视为严格的内部文件是不完整的,许多同样的因素也适用于我们在中东最强大的盟友。1948年以色列国成立后,这个年轻的国家经历了外交孤立和阿拉伯联盟的抵制。今天,以色列与联合国191个成员国中的154个国家建立了外交关系,还与非成员国梵蒂冈建立了外交关系。本文认为,佐治亚州立大学法学院法学副教授;埃默里大学法律和宗教学士学位候选人,韦克斯纳研究生奖学金(犹太拉比,叶史瓦大学)校友。曾在华盛顿高地的西奈山犹太中心和纽约市的美国贝斯丁担任拉比工作人员;1 David M. Golove和Daniel J. Hulsebosch著:《一个文明的国家:早期美国宪法、国际法和对国际承认的追求》116(纽约大学出版社)。《法律与法律理论工作文件》,第222号文件),可在http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/222查阅。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The State of Israel's Constitution; A Comparison of Civilized Nations
The art of constitution-making is never one-dimensional. In regard to the United States’ model, it has recently been argued that “[d]espite the enormous literature on the critical period, including the foreign affairs imperatives behind the movement for reform, it is not fully understood that the animus behind the reform effort that culminated in the new Constitution was a desire to ensure that the United States would be in a position to meet its international commitments and thereby earn international recognition.”1 While there are obvious differences, and while this concept is perhaps of even greater importance and more poignantly felt for a nation that has so long been plagued with issues of de facto and de jure recognition, many of the same factors that would make it incomplete to view the purpose of the American Constitution as a strictly internal document hold true for our strongest ally in the Middle East. After the establishment of the State of Israel in 1948, the young country experienced diplomatic isolation and Arab League boycotts. Today, Israel has diplomatic ties with 154 out of the other 191 member states of the United Nations, as well as with non-member Vatican City. This paper argues that the  Adjunct Professor of Law, Georgia State University College of Law; SJD Candidate in Law and Religion at Emory University, alumnus of the Wexner Graduate Fellowship (Rabbinate, Yeshiva University). Served on the rabbinic staff at Mt Sinai Jewish Center in Washington Heights and the Beth Din of America in New York City; J.D., New York University School of Law, LLM, Emory University School of Law. 1 David M. Golove & Daniel J. Hulsebosch, A Civilized Nation: The Early American Constitution, the Law of Nations, and the Pursuit of International Recognition 116 (N.Y.U. Pub. Law & Legal Theory Working Papers, Paper No. 222), available at http://lsr.nellco.org/nyu_plltwp/222.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信