优雅的解释

J. Williams
{"title":"优雅的解释","authors":"J. Williams","doi":"10.1093/oso/9780198850205.003.0009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is the third of three that sets out a metaphysics of linguistic representation, and the focus here is on the way that correct linguistic interpretation is selected. The correct interpretation is the best theory of the linguistic conventions, and the best theory optimizes simplicity (elegance) and fit with the data. It is argued that elegance should be understood relative to the language-users’ pooled conceptual repertoire, and the combined theory of representation in language and thought is wielded to resolve indeterminacy puzzles. The appeal to simplicity/elegance in this context is compared to appeals to simplicity/elegance in the context of the metaphysics of mental content, where a rather different approach was examined. The compatibility of the two approaches is assessed.","PeriodicalId":340183,"journal":{"name":"The Metaphysics of Representation","volume":"472 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elegant Interpretations\",\"authors\":\"J. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/oso/9780198850205.003.0009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter is the third of three that sets out a metaphysics of linguistic representation, and the focus here is on the way that correct linguistic interpretation is selected. The correct interpretation is the best theory of the linguistic conventions, and the best theory optimizes simplicity (elegance) and fit with the data. It is argued that elegance should be understood relative to the language-users’ pooled conceptual repertoire, and the combined theory of representation in language and thought is wielded to resolve indeterminacy puzzles. The appeal to simplicity/elegance in this context is compared to appeals to simplicity/elegance in the context of the metaphysics of mental content, where a rather different approach was examined. The compatibility of the two approaches is assessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":340183,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Metaphysics of Representation\",\"volume\":\"472 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Metaphysics of Representation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850205.003.0009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Metaphysics of Representation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198850205.003.0009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章是阐述语言表征形而上学的三章中的第三章,这里的重点是选择正确的语言解释的方式。正确的解释是语言惯例的最好理论,最好的理论是简化(优雅)和与资料的拟合。作者认为,优雅应该相对于语言使用者汇集的概念库来理解,并运用语言和思维的组合表征理论来解决不确定性难题。在这种情况下,对简单/优雅的呼吁与对精神内容形而上学背景下的简单/优雅的呼吁进行了比较,其中研究了一种截然不同的方法。评估了这两种方法的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elegant Interpretations
This chapter is the third of three that sets out a metaphysics of linguistic representation, and the focus here is on the way that correct linguistic interpretation is selected. The correct interpretation is the best theory of the linguistic conventions, and the best theory optimizes simplicity (elegance) and fit with the data. It is argued that elegance should be understood relative to the language-users’ pooled conceptual repertoire, and the combined theory of representation in language and thought is wielded to resolve indeterminacy puzzles. The appeal to simplicity/elegance in this context is compared to appeals to simplicity/elegance in the context of the metaphysics of mental content, where a rather different approach was examined. The compatibility of the two approaches is assessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信